鲤鱼隧道综合症的痛苦和灾难

Q4 Health Professions Fisioterapia Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-12 DOI:10.1016/j.ft.2024.10.001
O. del Pozo Blanco , E. González García
{"title":"鲤鱼隧道综合症的痛苦和灾难","authors":"O. del Pozo Blanco ,&nbsp;E. González García","doi":"10.1016/j.ft.2024.10.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To determine which variable influences pain in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS), specifically whether it is the severity of nerve injury or pain-associated catastrophization (PC). Additionally, to assess the relationship between electromyography (EMG) results and perceived pain in both hands.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>A prospective observational study of CTS patients with EMG results, who completed two questionnaires: the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) to quantify PC, and the McGill Pain Questionnaire to assess pain. For the latter, only the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) was used due to the difficulty patients faced in selecting the most appropriate term.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 74 subjects with CTS were studied. The intensity of pain and the severity of median nerve injury were not statistically significant in the right hand (<em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.925) or the left hand (<em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.270). A positive association was found between the PCS and pain in the right hand (<em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.011) and in the left hand (<em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.050). The relationship of the results between both hands was statistically significant for both EMG (<em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.001) and pain (<em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.000).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Pain in CTS is determined by PC rather than the severity of nerve injury. There is similarity in pain perception and the degree of median nerve injury between both hands.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34994,"journal":{"name":"Fisioterapia","volume":"47 1","pages":"Pages 20-27"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dolor y catastrofismo en el síndrome del túnel del carpo\",\"authors\":\"O. del Pozo Blanco ,&nbsp;E. González García\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ft.2024.10.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To determine which variable influences pain in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS), specifically whether it is the severity of nerve injury or pain-associated catastrophization (PC). Additionally, to assess the relationship between electromyography (EMG) results and perceived pain in both hands.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>A prospective observational study of CTS patients with EMG results, who completed two questionnaires: the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) to quantify PC, and the McGill Pain Questionnaire to assess pain. For the latter, only the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) was used due to the difficulty patients faced in selecting the most appropriate term.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 74 subjects with CTS were studied. The intensity of pain and the severity of median nerve injury were not statistically significant in the right hand (<em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.925) or the left hand (<em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.270). A positive association was found between the PCS and pain in the right hand (<em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.011) and in the left hand (<em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.050). The relationship of the results between both hands was statistically significant for both EMG (<em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.001) and pain (<em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.000).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Pain in CTS is determined by PC rather than the severity of nerve injury. There is similarity in pain perception and the degree of median nerve injury between both hands.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34994,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fisioterapia\",\"volume\":\"47 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 20-27\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fisioterapia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S021156382400258X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Health Professions\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fisioterapia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S021156382400258X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的探讨影响腕管综合征(CTS)患者疼痛的因素,特别是神经损伤的严重程度和疼痛相关的巨化(PC)。此外,评估肌电图(EMG)结果与双手感知疼痛之间的关系。方法对有肌电图结果的CTS患者进行前瞻性观察研究,他们完成了两份问卷:量化PC的疼痛灾难量表(PCS)和评估疼痛的McGill疼痛问卷。对于后者,由于患者难以选择最合适的术语,仅使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)。结果共调查74例CTS患者。两组疼痛程度、正中神经损伤程度差异无统计学意义(p = 0.925),左手疼痛程度差异无统计学意义(p = 0.270)。PCS与右手疼痛呈正相关(p = 0.011),左手疼痛呈正相关(p = 0.050)。双手肌电图(p = 0.001)和疼痛(p = 0.000)结果之间的关系具有统计学意义。结论CTS的西班牙程度与神经损伤程度无关,而与PC有关。双手的痛觉和正中神经损伤程度有相似之处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Dolor y catastrofismo en el síndrome del túnel del carpo

Objectives

To determine which variable influences pain in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS), specifically whether it is the severity of nerve injury or pain-associated catastrophization (PC). Additionally, to assess the relationship between electromyography (EMG) results and perceived pain in both hands.

Method

A prospective observational study of CTS patients with EMG results, who completed two questionnaires: the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) to quantify PC, and the McGill Pain Questionnaire to assess pain. For the latter, only the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) was used due to the difficulty patients faced in selecting the most appropriate term.

Results

A total of 74 subjects with CTS were studied. The intensity of pain and the severity of median nerve injury were not statistically significant in the right hand (p = 0.925) or the left hand (p = 0.270). A positive association was found between the PCS and pain in the right hand (p = 0.011) and in the left hand (p = 0.050). The relationship of the results between both hands was statistically significant for both EMG (p = 0.001) and pain (p = 0.000).

Conclusions

Pain in CTS is determined by PC rather than the severity of nerve injury. There is similarity in pain perception and the degree of median nerve injury between both hands.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Fisioterapia
Fisioterapia Health Professions-Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: Publicación Oficial de la Sociedad Española de Fisioterapeutas. Sus páginas ofrecen desde artículos originales hasta revisiones, pasando por el estudio de casos o los actos más importantes relacionados con la especialidad.
期刊最新文献
Perfil clínico y funcional de los pacientes que solicitan fisioterapia domiciliaria: un estudio observacional descriptivo transversal en Galicia Inteligencia artificial y confianza en la práctica sanitaria: cuando el algoritmo entra en la consulta Memoria y variabilidad interindividual en la respuesta a un programa de entrenamiento de fuerza con bandas elásticas en mujeres con exceso de peso Effects of ergonomic workstation interventions and deep neck flexors’ exercise on neck muscle performance, forward head posture, and neck disability in bankers with chronic neck pain: A randomized controlled trial Efectos de la fisioterapia en la disfunción eréctil tras prostatectomía radical
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1