结直肠手术中的抗菌化学预防。

F Tonelli
{"title":"结直肠手术中的抗菌化学预防。","authors":"F Tonelli","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Infective complications are often seen in colorectal surgery. These even occur in cases of elective surgery and in patients where adequate bowel preparation has been performed and is due to the very high numbers of bacteria colonising the bowel. Several controlled clinical studies showed that antimicrobial prophylaxis is effective in preventing infective complications and the lack of prophylaxis is no longer justified. Antimicrobial prophylaxis can be oral (poorly absorbed antibiotics aimed to reduce the number of bacteria in the bowel) or systemic (aimed to reach a high tissue concentration when bacterial contamination occurs, in order to prevent colonisation) or a combination of the two. Which is to be preferred is still controversial. Systemic prophylaxis should have the following features: 1) use of a single agent with a broad spectrum of action, effective both on aerobes and anaerobes; 2) rapid I.V. administration, at the beginning of surgery; 3) good tissue penetration; 4) long half-life, in order to assure that the single dose will cover the whole duration of surgery; 5) good therapeutic ratio. The use of long half-life cephalosporins, particularly cefotetan, was shown to be highly beneficial. Prophylaxis can fail if contamination during surgery is severe, with a particularly high bacterial count. The degree of contamination of the operating field can be evaluated both by surgeon's judgment, and by tissue or peritoneal cavity lavage fluid sampling and culture. In case of severe contamination (bacterial number greater than 10(5) CFU/ml of fluid or mg of tissue) prolonging of antibiotic therapy for some days is justified. Otherwise, no evidence supports its prolongation beyond surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":9733,"journal":{"name":"Chemioterapia : international journal of the Mediterranean Society of Chemotherapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1988-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Antimicrobial chemoprophylaxis in colorectal surgery.\",\"authors\":\"F Tonelli\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Infective complications are often seen in colorectal surgery. These even occur in cases of elective surgery and in patients where adequate bowel preparation has been performed and is due to the very high numbers of bacteria colonising the bowel. Several controlled clinical studies showed that antimicrobial prophylaxis is effective in preventing infective complications and the lack of prophylaxis is no longer justified. Antimicrobial prophylaxis can be oral (poorly absorbed antibiotics aimed to reduce the number of bacteria in the bowel) or systemic (aimed to reach a high tissue concentration when bacterial contamination occurs, in order to prevent colonisation) or a combination of the two. Which is to be preferred is still controversial. Systemic prophylaxis should have the following features: 1) use of a single agent with a broad spectrum of action, effective both on aerobes and anaerobes; 2) rapid I.V. administration, at the beginning of surgery; 3) good tissue penetration; 4) long half-life, in order to assure that the single dose will cover the whole duration of surgery; 5) good therapeutic ratio. The use of long half-life cephalosporins, particularly cefotetan, was shown to be highly beneficial. Prophylaxis can fail if contamination during surgery is severe, with a particularly high bacterial count. The degree of contamination of the operating field can be evaluated both by surgeon's judgment, and by tissue or peritoneal cavity lavage fluid sampling and culture. In case of severe contamination (bacterial number greater than 10(5) CFU/ml of fluid or mg of tissue) prolonging of antibiotic therapy for some days is justified. Otherwise, no evidence supports its prolongation beyond surgery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9733,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chemioterapia : international journal of the Mediterranean Society of Chemotherapy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1988-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chemioterapia : international journal of the Mediterranean Society of Chemotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemioterapia : international journal of the Mediterranean Society of Chemotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

感染并发症是结直肠手术中常见的并发症。这些甚至发生在选择性手术的病例中,以及在进行了充分肠道准备的患者中,这是由于肠道内的细菌数量非常高。几项对照临床研究表明,抗菌素预防在预防感染并发症方面是有效的,缺乏预防不再是合理的。抗菌素预防可以是口服(旨在减少肠道细菌数量的吸收不良的抗生素)或全身(旨在在细菌污染发生时达到高组织浓度,以防止定植)或两者的结合。孰优孰劣仍有争议。系统性预防应具有以下特点:1)使用单一药物,具有广谱作用,对需氧菌和厌氧菌均有效;2)快速静脉注射,在手术开始时;3)组织穿透性好;4)半衰期长,以保证单次剂量覆盖整个手术期间;5)治疗比好。使用长半衰期的头孢菌素,特别是头孢替坦,是非常有益的。如果手术期间污染严重,细菌数量特别高,预防措施可能会失败。手术野的污染程度既可以通过外科医生的判断来评估,也可以通过组织或腹腔灌洗液取样和培养来评估。在严重污染的情况下(细菌数量大于10(5)CFU/ml液体或mg组织),延长抗生素治疗几天是合理的。否则,没有证据支持手术后的延长。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Antimicrobial chemoprophylaxis in colorectal surgery.

Infective complications are often seen in colorectal surgery. These even occur in cases of elective surgery and in patients where adequate bowel preparation has been performed and is due to the very high numbers of bacteria colonising the bowel. Several controlled clinical studies showed that antimicrobial prophylaxis is effective in preventing infective complications and the lack of prophylaxis is no longer justified. Antimicrobial prophylaxis can be oral (poorly absorbed antibiotics aimed to reduce the number of bacteria in the bowel) or systemic (aimed to reach a high tissue concentration when bacterial contamination occurs, in order to prevent colonisation) or a combination of the two. Which is to be preferred is still controversial. Systemic prophylaxis should have the following features: 1) use of a single agent with a broad spectrum of action, effective both on aerobes and anaerobes; 2) rapid I.V. administration, at the beginning of surgery; 3) good tissue penetration; 4) long half-life, in order to assure that the single dose will cover the whole duration of surgery; 5) good therapeutic ratio. The use of long half-life cephalosporins, particularly cefotetan, was shown to be highly beneficial. Prophylaxis can fail if contamination during surgery is severe, with a particularly high bacterial count. The degree of contamination of the operating field can be evaluated both by surgeon's judgment, and by tissue or peritoneal cavity lavage fluid sampling and culture. In case of severe contamination (bacterial number greater than 10(5) CFU/ml of fluid or mg of tissue) prolonging of antibiotic therapy for some days is justified. Otherwise, no evidence supports its prolongation beyond surgery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The natural history of hepatitis B virus infection. The effectiveness of chemotherapy in localized malignant fibrous histiocytoma (MFH) of bone: the Rizzoli Institute experience with 66 patients treated with surgery alone or surgery + adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Perspectives for the chemotherapy of AIDS. Treatment of chronic hepatitis B with human lymphoblastoid interferon: results of a controlled trial. Interferon treatment of anti-HBe positive and HBV DNA positive chronic hepatitis B.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1