多个粗圆柱布置上的临界后流动

IF 5.1 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-09 DOI:10.1016/j.jweia.2024.105964
David Burton, Gershom Easanesan, Anil Pasam, Christopher Brown, Daniel Tudball Smith, Mark C. Thompson
{"title":"多个粗圆柱布置上的临界后流动","authors":"David Burton,&nbsp;Gershom Easanesan,&nbsp;Anil Pasam,&nbsp;Christopher Brown,&nbsp;Daniel Tudball Smith,&nbsp;Mark C. Thompson","doi":"10.1016/j.jweia.2024.105964","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In this study, a comprehensive set of wind-tunnel experiments was undertaken to gain insight into the variation of force coefficients (lift and drag) across different wind angles and spacings for equidistant cylinder arrangements (two, three, and four cylinders) in post-critical flows. The effect of both the cylinder spacing and wind incidence angle was examined for a roughness Reynolds number of approximately 770. The broad trends in the force coefficients previously observed for cylinders in sub-critical flow are shown to persist in post-critical flow, although the magnitudes of the coefficients are different, particularly for the maximum lift coefficient. Additionally, several methods are examined for predicting the forces experienced by multiple cylinder combinations using data obtained from the two-cylinder case. In general, these methods provide good predictions for large cylinder spacings but are inconsistent when the cylinders are spaced closer together.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54752,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics","volume":"257 ","pages":"Article 105964"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Post-critical flow over arrangements of multiple rough cylinders\",\"authors\":\"David Burton,&nbsp;Gershom Easanesan,&nbsp;Anil Pasam,&nbsp;Christopher Brown,&nbsp;Daniel Tudball Smith,&nbsp;Mark C. Thompson\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jweia.2024.105964\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>In this study, a comprehensive set of wind-tunnel experiments was undertaken to gain insight into the variation of force coefficients (lift and drag) across different wind angles and spacings for equidistant cylinder arrangements (two, three, and four cylinders) in post-critical flows. The effect of both the cylinder spacing and wind incidence angle was examined for a roughness Reynolds number of approximately 770. The broad trends in the force coefficients previously observed for cylinders in sub-critical flow are shown to persist in post-critical flow, although the magnitudes of the coefficients are different, particularly for the maximum lift coefficient. Additionally, several methods are examined for predicting the forces experienced by multiple cylinder combinations using data obtained from the two-cylinder case. In general, these methods provide good predictions for large cylinder spacings but are inconsistent when the cylinders are spaced closer together.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54752,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics\",\"volume\":\"257 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105964\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167610524003271\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167610524003271","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在这项研究中,进行了一套全面的风洞实验,以深入了解临界后流动中不同风角和等距圆柱布置(两个、三个和四个圆柱)间距下力系数(升力和阻力)的变化。在粗糙度雷诺数约为770的条件下,考察了柱体间距和风入射角的影响。先前在亚临界流动中观察到的圆柱体力系数的大趋势显示在临界后流动中持续存在,尽管系数的大小不同,特别是对于最大升力系数。此外,使用从双缸情况中获得的数据,研究了几种预测多缸组合所经历的力的方法。一般来说,这些方法对较大的气缸间距提供了很好的预测,但当气缸间距更近时,这些方法就不一致了。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Post-critical flow over arrangements of multiple rough cylinders
In this study, a comprehensive set of wind-tunnel experiments was undertaken to gain insight into the variation of force coefficients (lift and drag) across different wind angles and spacings for equidistant cylinder arrangements (two, three, and four cylinders) in post-critical flows. The effect of both the cylinder spacing and wind incidence angle was examined for a roughness Reynolds number of approximately 770. The broad trends in the force coefficients previously observed for cylinders in sub-critical flow are shown to persist in post-critical flow, although the magnitudes of the coefficients are different, particularly for the maximum lift coefficient. Additionally, several methods are examined for predicting the forces experienced by multiple cylinder combinations using data obtained from the two-cylinder case. In general, these methods provide good predictions for large cylinder spacings but are inconsistent when the cylinders are spaced closer together.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
22.90%
发文量
306
审稿时长
4.4 months
期刊介绍: The objective of the journal is to provide a means for the publication and interchange of information, on an international basis, on all those aspects of wind engineering that are included in the activities of the International Association for Wind Engineering http://www.iawe.org/. These are: social and economic impact of wind effects; wind characteristics and structure, local wind environments, wind loads and structural response, diffusion, pollutant dispersion and matter transport, wind effects on building heat loss and ventilation, wind effects on transport systems, aerodynamic aspects of wind energy generation, and codification of wind effects. Papers on these subjects describing full-scale measurements, wind-tunnel simulation studies, computational or theoretical methods are published, as well as papers dealing with the development of techniques and apparatus for wind engineering experiments.
期刊最新文献
Large eddy simulation on aerodynamic parameters of super high-rise buildings with various aspect ratios under across-wind vibration Research on the aerodynamic characteristics and aerodynamic mathematical model of streamlined box girders under coupled wind-wave action Complementary use of CFD simulations and wind tunnel tests in wind engineering: A practical classification and examples of their integration A multi-parameter deep learning model for wind pressure prediction on low-rise buildings The effects of vortex generators and Gurney flaps on the dynamic stall of airfoils
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1