18岁以下胸椎区域质子束治疗可重复装置固定的标准化

IF 7.4 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-03 DOI:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.11.052
T. Patel , K. Osbourn , C. Dunlea , K. Quingua , S. Petkar , E. Patel , W. Harrison-Carey , H. Grimes , J. Gains , P. Lim
{"title":"18岁以下胸椎区域质子束治疗可重复装置固定的标准化","authors":"T. Patel ,&nbsp;K. Osbourn ,&nbsp;C. Dunlea ,&nbsp;K. Quingua ,&nbsp;S. Petkar ,&nbsp;E. Patel ,&nbsp;W. Harrison-Carey ,&nbsp;H. Grimes ,&nbsp;J. Gains ,&nbsp;P. Lim","doi":"10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.11.052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To review positioning and immobilisation for patients treated with PBT in the thoracic region for sarcoma and lymphoma. To evaluate daily set up error from imaging data, comparing immobilisation methods.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective analysis of patients ≤18 years treated with PBT in the thoracic region at University College London Hospitals from December 2021 to present date was undertaken. Diagnosis, age, general anaesthetic requirement, treatment site, positioning and immobilisation were recorded. Image verification data including daily set up error, additional imaging and dosimetric evaluation of positional discrepancies were captured and analysed from ARIA record and verify system.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Twenty patients, with a mean range of age of 13 years (range 5-18y), were treated. Five patients were treated under general anaesthesia. All patients were immobilised in either a long vacuum bag, short vacuum bag or head and shoulders thermoplastic shell with personalised Moldcare® cushion. Individual and population set up error means and standard deviation were calculated and compared by immobilisation type, general anaesthesia status and treatment site. Due to small population, no statistically significant differences in set-up errors were noted for all variables. Overall population translation means ≤1mm, standard deviation ≤0.3; rotational means ≤0.2°, standard deviation ≤0.75. Shoulder position was the most frequent cause for patient re-positioning, followed by correction of yaw. Patients immobilised in head and shoulders thermoplastic shells did not show reduced set-up error compared to those immobilised in a vacuum bag. This was attributed to patient specific factors. Patients ≥10 years treated under general anaesthesia had greater set-up error than those treated awake.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The optimal immobilisation method is determined primarily by treatment site and beam arrangement for treatment delivery. Patient factors such as comfort and compliance influenced set-up reproducibility and should be given due consideration, when selecting immobilisation, in all cases.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14215,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics","volume":"121 3","pages":"Page e14"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Standardization of Immobilization for Reproducible Set-Up for Patients Under 18 Years Treated with Proton Beam Therapy in the Thoracic Region\",\"authors\":\"T. Patel ,&nbsp;K. Osbourn ,&nbsp;C. Dunlea ,&nbsp;K. Quingua ,&nbsp;S. Petkar ,&nbsp;E. Patel ,&nbsp;W. Harrison-Carey ,&nbsp;H. Grimes ,&nbsp;J. Gains ,&nbsp;P. Lim\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.11.052\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To review positioning and immobilisation for patients treated with PBT in the thoracic region for sarcoma and lymphoma. To evaluate daily set up error from imaging data, comparing immobilisation methods.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective analysis of patients ≤18 years treated with PBT in the thoracic region at University College London Hospitals from December 2021 to present date was undertaken. Diagnosis, age, general anaesthetic requirement, treatment site, positioning and immobilisation were recorded. Image verification data including daily set up error, additional imaging and dosimetric evaluation of positional discrepancies were captured and analysed from ARIA record and verify system.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Twenty patients, with a mean range of age of 13 years (range 5-18y), were treated. Five patients were treated under general anaesthesia. All patients were immobilised in either a long vacuum bag, short vacuum bag or head and shoulders thermoplastic shell with personalised Moldcare® cushion. Individual and population set up error means and standard deviation were calculated and compared by immobilisation type, general anaesthesia status and treatment site. Due to small population, no statistically significant differences in set-up errors were noted for all variables. Overall population translation means ≤1mm, standard deviation ≤0.3; rotational means ≤0.2°, standard deviation ≤0.75. Shoulder position was the most frequent cause for patient re-positioning, followed by correction of yaw. Patients immobilised in head and shoulders thermoplastic shells did not show reduced set-up error compared to those immobilised in a vacuum bag. This was attributed to patient specific factors. Patients ≥10 years treated under general anaesthesia had greater set-up error than those treated awake.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The optimal immobilisation method is determined primarily by treatment site and beam arrangement for treatment delivery. Patient factors such as comfort and compliance influenced set-up reproducibility and should be given due consideration, when selecting immobilisation, in all cases.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14215,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics\",\"volume\":\"121 3\",\"pages\":\"Page e14\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360301624036265\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360301624036265","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的探讨胸椎肿瘤和淋巴瘤患者行PBT治疗的定位和固定方法。从影像学数据评估每日设置误差,比较固定方法。方法回顾性分析2021年12月至今在伦敦大学学院医院接受胸椎PBT治疗的≤18岁的患者。记录患者的诊断、年龄、全身麻醉要求、治疗部位、体位和固定。图像验证数据包括每日设置误差、附加成像和剂量学评估位置差异,从ARIA记录和验证系统中捕获和分析。结果20例患者,平均年龄13岁(5 ~ 18岁)。5例患者全麻治疗。所有患者均固定在长真空袋、短真空袋或头部和肩部带有个性化Moldcare®缓冲垫的热塑性外壳中。按固定方式、全身麻醉状态和治疗部位计算个体和群体设置的误差均值和标准差。由于人口较少,所有变量的设置误差没有统计学上的显著差异。总体人口平移均值≤1mm,标准差≤0.3;转动平均值≤0.2°,标准差≤0.75。肩部位置是患者重新定位的最常见原因,其次是偏航矫正。与那些固定在真空袋中的患者相比,固定在头部和肩部热塑性外壳中的患者没有显示出减少的设置误差。这归因于患者的特定因素。全麻治疗≥10年的患者比清醒治疗的患者有更大的设置误差。结论最佳固定方法主要由治疗部位和治疗输送的光束排列决定。患者因素,如舒适度和依从性影响设置的可重复性,在选择固定时应给予应有的考虑,在所有情况下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Standardization of Immobilization for Reproducible Set-Up for Patients Under 18 Years Treated with Proton Beam Therapy in the Thoracic Region

Objectives

To review positioning and immobilisation for patients treated with PBT in the thoracic region for sarcoma and lymphoma. To evaluate daily set up error from imaging data, comparing immobilisation methods.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of patients ≤18 years treated with PBT in the thoracic region at University College London Hospitals from December 2021 to present date was undertaken. Diagnosis, age, general anaesthetic requirement, treatment site, positioning and immobilisation were recorded. Image verification data including daily set up error, additional imaging and dosimetric evaluation of positional discrepancies were captured and analysed from ARIA record and verify system.

Results

Twenty patients, with a mean range of age of 13 years (range 5-18y), were treated. Five patients were treated under general anaesthesia. All patients were immobilised in either a long vacuum bag, short vacuum bag or head and shoulders thermoplastic shell with personalised Moldcare® cushion. Individual and population set up error means and standard deviation were calculated and compared by immobilisation type, general anaesthesia status and treatment site. Due to small population, no statistically significant differences in set-up errors were noted for all variables. Overall population translation means ≤1mm, standard deviation ≤0.3; rotational means ≤0.2°, standard deviation ≤0.75. Shoulder position was the most frequent cause for patient re-positioning, followed by correction of yaw. Patients immobilised in head and shoulders thermoplastic shells did not show reduced set-up error compared to those immobilised in a vacuum bag. This was attributed to patient specific factors. Patients ≥10 years treated under general anaesthesia had greater set-up error than those treated awake.

Conclusion

The optimal immobilisation method is determined primarily by treatment site and beam arrangement for treatment delivery. Patient factors such as comfort and compliance influenced set-up reproducibility and should be given due consideration, when selecting immobilisation, in all cases.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
7.10%
发文量
2538
审稿时长
6.6 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Radiation Oncology • Biology • Physics (IJROBP), known in the field as the Red Journal, publishes original laboratory and clinical investigations related to radiation oncology, radiation biology, medical physics, and both education and health policy as it relates to the field. This journal has a particular interest in original contributions of the following types: prospective clinical trials, outcomes research, and large database interrogation. In addition, it seeks reports of high-impact innovations in single or combined modality treatment, tumor sensitization, normal tissue protection (including both precision avoidance and pharmacologic means), brachytherapy, particle irradiation, and cancer imaging. Technical advances related to dosimetry and conformal radiation treatment planning are of interest, as are basic science studies investigating tumor physiology and the molecular biology underlying cancer and normal tissue radiation response.
期刊最新文献
The Critical Role of Dose Homogeneity in Modern Breast Hypofractionation Radiation Dose and Lymphedema Risk After Immediate Lymphatic Reconstruction and Axillary Lymph Node Dissection Geographic and Sociodemographic Disparities in Access to Radiation Therapy in Brazil: A Nationwide Cross-Sectional Study (2017-2022) In Reply to Acharya Cancer as a Chronic Disease and the Role of Reirradiation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1