T. Patel , K. Osbourn , C. Dunlea , K. Quingua , S. Petkar , E. Patel , W. Harrison-Carey , H. Grimes , J. Gains , P. Lim
{"title":"18岁以下胸椎区域质子束治疗可重复装置固定的标准化","authors":"T. Patel , K. Osbourn , C. Dunlea , K. Quingua , S. Petkar , E. Patel , W. Harrison-Carey , H. Grimes , J. Gains , P. Lim","doi":"10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.11.052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To review positioning and immobilisation for patients treated with PBT in the thoracic region for sarcoma and lymphoma. To evaluate daily set up error from imaging data, comparing immobilisation methods.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective analysis of patients ≤18 years treated with PBT in the thoracic region at University College London Hospitals from December 2021 to present date was undertaken. Diagnosis, age, general anaesthetic requirement, treatment site, positioning and immobilisation were recorded. Image verification data including daily set up error, additional imaging and dosimetric evaluation of positional discrepancies were captured and analysed from ARIA record and verify system.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Twenty patients, with a mean range of age of 13 years (range 5-18y), were treated. Five patients were treated under general anaesthesia. All patients were immobilised in either a long vacuum bag, short vacuum bag or head and shoulders thermoplastic shell with personalised Moldcare® cushion. Individual and population set up error means and standard deviation were calculated and compared by immobilisation type, general anaesthesia status and treatment site. Due to small population, no statistically significant differences in set-up errors were noted for all variables. Overall population translation means ≤1mm, standard deviation ≤0.3; rotational means ≤0.2°, standard deviation ≤0.75. Shoulder position was the most frequent cause for patient re-positioning, followed by correction of yaw. Patients immobilised in head and shoulders thermoplastic shells did not show reduced set-up error compared to those immobilised in a vacuum bag. This was attributed to patient specific factors. Patients ≥10 years treated under general anaesthesia had greater set-up error than those treated awake.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The optimal immobilisation method is determined primarily by treatment site and beam arrangement for treatment delivery. Patient factors such as comfort and compliance influenced set-up reproducibility and should be given due consideration, when selecting immobilisation, in all cases.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14215,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics","volume":"121 3","pages":"Page e14"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Standardization of Immobilization for Reproducible Set-Up for Patients Under 18 Years Treated with Proton Beam Therapy in the Thoracic Region\",\"authors\":\"T. Patel , K. Osbourn , C. Dunlea , K. Quingua , S. Petkar , E. Patel , W. Harrison-Carey , H. Grimes , J. Gains , P. Lim\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.11.052\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To review positioning and immobilisation for patients treated with PBT in the thoracic region for sarcoma and lymphoma. To evaluate daily set up error from imaging data, comparing immobilisation methods.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective analysis of patients ≤18 years treated with PBT in the thoracic region at University College London Hospitals from December 2021 to present date was undertaken. Diagnosis, age, general anaesthetic requirement, treatment site, positioning and immobilisation were recorded. Image verification data including daily set up error, additional imaging and dosimetric evaluation of positional discrepancies were captured and analysed from ARIA record and verify system.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Twenty patients, with a mean range of age of 13 years (range 5-18y), were treated. Five patients were treated under general anaesthesia. All patients were immobilised in either a long vacuum bag, short vacuum bag or head and shoulders thermoplastic shell with personalised Moldcare® cushion. Individual and population set up error means and standard deviation were calculated and compared by immobilisation type, general anaesthesia status and treatment site. Due to small population, no statistically significant differences in set-up errors were noted for all variables. Overall population translation means ≤1mm, standard deviation ≤0.3; rotational means ≤0.2°, standard deviation ≤0.75. Shoulder position was the most frequent cause for patient re-positioning, followed by correction of yaw. Patients immobilised in head and shoulders thermoplastic shells did not show reduced set-up error compared to those immobilised in a vacuum bag. This was attributed to patient specific factors. Patients ≥10 years treated under general anaesthesia had greater set-up error than those treated awake.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The optimal immobilisation method is determined primarily by treatment site and beam arrangement for treatment delivery. Patient factors such as comfort and compliance influenced set-up reproducibility and should be given due consideration, when selecting immobilisation, in all cases.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14215,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics\",\"volume\":\"121 3\",\"pages\":\"Page e14\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360301624036265\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360301624036265","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Standardization of Immobilization for Reproducible Set-Up for Patients Under 18 Years Treated with Proton Beam Therapy in the Thoracic Region
Objectives
To review positioning and immobilisation for patients treated with PBT in the thoracic region for sarcoma and lymphoma. To evaluate daily set up error from imaging data, comparing immobilisation methods.
Methods
A retrospective analysis of patients ≤18 years treated with PBT in the thoracic region at University College London Hospitals from December 2021 to present date was undertaken. Diagnosis, age, general anaesthetic requirement, treatment site, positioning and immobilisation were recorded. Image verification data including daily set up error, additional imaging and dosimetric evaluation of positional discrepancies were captured and analysed from ARIA record and verify system.
Results
Twenty patients, with a mean range of age of 13 years (range 5-18y), were treated. Five patients were treated under general anaesthesia. All patients were immobilised in either a long vacuum bag, short vacuum bag or head and shoulders thermoplastic shell with personalised Moldcare® cushion. Individual and population set up error means and standard deviation were calculated and compared by immobilisation type, general anaesthesia status and treatment site. Due to small population, no statistically significant differences in set-up errors were noted for all variables. Overall population translation means ≤1mm, standard deviation ≤0.3; rotational means ≤0.2°, standard deviation ≤0.75. Shoulder position was the most frequent cause for patient re-positioning, followed by correction of yaw. Patients immobilised in head and shoulders thermoplastic shells did not show reduced set-up error compared to those immobilised in a vacuum bag. This was attributed to patient specific factors. Patients ≥10 years treated under general anaesthesia had greater set-up error than those treated awake.
Conclusion
The optimal immobilisation method is determined primarily by treatment site and beam arrangement for treatment delivery. Patient factors such as comfort and compliance influenced set-up reproducibility and should be given due consideration, when selecting immobilisation, in all cases.
期刊介绍:
International Journal of Radiation Oncology • Biology • Physics (IJROBP), known in the field as the Red Journal, publishes original laboratory and clinical investigations related to radiation oncology, radiation biology, medical physics, and both education and health policy as it relates to the field.
This journal has a particular interest in original contributions of the following types: prospective clinical trials, outcomes research, and large database interrogation. In addition, it seeks reports of high-impact innovations in single or combined modality treatment, tumor sensitization, normal tissue protection (including both precision avoidance and pharmacologic means), brachytherapy, particle irradiation, and cancer imaging. Technical advances related to dosimetry and conformal radiation treatment planning are of interest, as are basic science studies investigating tumor physiology and the molecular biology underlying cancer and normal tissue radiation response.