Yining Zhang , Zhongze Cao , Xiran Cao , Yue Che , Xuelan Zhang , Mingyao Luo , Chang Shu
{"title":"胸椎血管内主动脉修复术中不同手术锁骨下血运重建形态的血流动力学","authors":"Yining Zhang , Zhongze Cao , Xiran Cao , Yue Che , Xuelan Zhang , Mingyao Luo , Chang Shu","doi":"10.1016/j.cmpb.2025.108632","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and Objective</h3><div>Carotid-subclavian bypass (CSB) and subclavian-carotid transposition (SCT) are mainstream surgical left subclavian artery (LSA) revascularization methods. However, surgical selection of CSB and SCT morphological configurations mainly depends on surgeons’ experience, lacking objective data basis.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Geometries with 28 configurations, including length, diameter, angle, and anastomotic direction for prosthetic conduit and transposed LSA, were constructed. Numerical simulations were performed to evaluate CSB and SCT outcomes by hemodynamic parameters such as pressure drop, flow rate, energy loss and wall shear stress related indicators.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>After CSB, enlarging prosthetic conduit diameter (6 to 10 mm) increases flow rate by 36.64 %, suggesting larger diameter enhances LSA patency. However, when diameter exceeds 9 mm, the relative residence time rises by 35.29 %, demonstrating oversized diameter increases the risk of thrombosis. Compared to 5 mm, prosthetic conduit at 15 mm displays a 7.80 % flow rate reduction, indicating longer conduit causes greater flow resistance. For varying angles, prosthetic conduit perpendicular to left common carotid artery (LCCA) shows the least energy loss. Conduit tilted downward from the vertical position shows higher flow rate than the upward during systole (210.35 vs. 106.34 ml/min). However, 10 % blood flow in downward conduit reflows cyclically during diastole, resulting in the reduced cycle-averaged flow rate of downward conduit compared to that of the upward (53.21 vs. 58.42 ml/min). After SCT, configurations with smaller angles between LCCA and LSA show better hemodynamic performance, with a maximum flow rate variation of 30.34 % in LSA from 50° to 110°.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Configurations with moderately smaller diameter, reduced length of prosthetic conduit and aligned anastomosis towards LCCA blood flow result in better LSA revascularization outcomes. The findings are supportive for optimizing CSB and SCT configurations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10624,"journal":{"name":"Computer methods and programs in biomedicine","volume":"261 ","pages":"Article 108632"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hemodynamics of different surgical subclavian revascularization morphologies for thoracic endovascular aortic repair\",\"authors\":\"Yining Zhang , Zhongze Cao , Xiran Cao , Yue Che , Xuelan Zhang , Mingyao Luo , Chang Shu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cmpb.2025.108632\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background and Objective</h3><div>Carotid-subclavian bypass (CSB) and subclavian-carotid transposition (SCT) are mainstream surgical left subclavian artery (LSA) revascularization methods. However, surgical selection of CSB and SCT morphological configurations mainly depends on surgeons’ experience, lacking objective data basis.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Geometries with 28 configurations, including length, diameter, angle, and anastomotic direction for prosthetic conduit and transposed LSA, were constructed. Numerical simulations were performed to evaluate CSB and SCT outcomes by hemodynamic parameters such as pressure drop, flow rate, energy loss and wall shear stress related indicators.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>After CSB, enlarging prosthetic conduit diameter (6 to 10 mm) increases flow rate by 36.64 %, suggesting larger diameter enhances LSA patency. However, when diameter exceeds 9 mm, the relative residence time rises by 35.29 %, demonstrating oversized diameter increases the risk of thrombosis. Compared to 5 mm, prosthetic conduit at 15 mm displays a 7.80 % flow rate reduction, indicating longer conduit causes greater flow resistance. For varying angles, prosthetic conduit perpendicular to left common carotid artery (LCCA) shows the least energy loss. Conduit tilted downward from the vertical position shows higher flow rate than the upward during systole (210.35 vs. 106.34 ml/min). However, 10 % blood flow in downward conduit reflows cyclically during diastole, resulting in the reduced cycle-averaged flow rate of downward conduit compared to that of the upward (53.21 vs. 58.42 ml/min). After SCT, configurations with smaller angles between LCCA and LSA show better hemodynamic performance, with a maximum flow rate variation of 30.34 % in LSA from 50° to 110°.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Configurations with moderately smaller diameter, reduced length of prosthetic conduit and aligned anastomosis towards LCCA blood flow result in better LSA revascularization outcomes. The findings are supportive for optimizing CSB and SCT configurations.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10624,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computer methods and programs in biomedicine\",\"volume\":\"261 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108632\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computer methods and programs in biomedicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169260725000495\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/31 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computer methods and programs in biomedicine","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169260725000495","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景与目的锁骨下颈动脉搭桥术(CSB)和锁骨下颈动脉转位术(SCT)是外科手术中主流的左锁骨下动脉(LSA)血管重建术。然而,CSB和SCT形态形态的手术选择主要依赖于外科医生的经验,缺乏客观的数据依据。方法构建假体导管和转置LSA的长度、直径、角度、吻合方向等28种几何构型。通过压降、流速、能量损失和壁面剪应力相关指标等血流动力学参数对CSB和SCT结果进行数值模拟。结果经CSB后,增大假体导管直径(6 ~ 10 mm)可使血流速率提高36.64%,表明直径增大可增强LSA的通畅。而当直径超过9 mm时,相对停留时间增加35.29%,说明直径过大会增加血栓形成的风险。与5毫米相比,15毫米的假体导管流速降低了7.80%,这表明更长的导管会产生更大的流动阻力。在不同角度下,垂直于左颈总动脉(LCCA)的假体导管能量损失最小。收缩时垂直向下倾斜的导管流速高于向上倾斜的导管(210.35 ml/min vs. 106.34 ml/min)。然而,在舒张期,10%的血流在下行导管中循环回流,导致下行导管的周期平均流速比上行导管低(53.21 ml/min vs. 58.42 ml/min)。SCT后,LCCA与LSA夹角越小的构型血流动力学性能越好,LSA在50°- 110°范围内流量变化最大,达到30.34%。结论适当缩小假体导管直径、缩短假体导管长度并与LCCA血流对齐吻合可获得较好的LCCA血运重建效果。研究结果为优化CSB和SCT配置提供了支持。
Hemodynamics of different surgical subclavian revascularization morphologies for thoracic endovascular aortic repair
Background and Objective
Carotid-subclavian bypass (CSB) and subclavian-carotid transposition (SCT) are mainstream surgical left subclavian artery (LSA) revascularization methods. However, surgical selection of CSB and SCT morphological configurations mainly depends on surgeons’ experience, lacking objective data basis.
Methods
Geometries with 28 configurations, including length, diameter, angle, and anastomotic direction for prosthetic conduit and transposed LSA, were constructed. Numerical simulations were performed to evaluate CSB and SCT outcomes by hemodynamic parameters such as pressure drop, flow rate, energy loss and wall shear stress related indicators.
Results
After CSB, enlarging prosthetic conduit diameter (6 to 10 mm) increases flow rate by 36.64 %, suggesting larger diameter enhances LSA patency. However, when diameter exceeds 9 mm, the relative residence time rises by 35.29 %, demonstrating oversized diameter increases the risk of thrombosis. Compared to 5 mm, prosthetic conduit at 15 mm displays a 7.80 % flow rate reduction, indicating longer conduit causes greater flow resistance. For varying angles, prosthetic conduit perpendicular to left common carotid artery (LCCA) shows the least energy loss. Conduit tilted downward from the vertical position shows higher flow rate than the upward during systole (210.35 vs. 106.34 ml/min). However, 10 % blood flow in downward conduit reflows cyclically during diastole, resulting in the reduced cycle-averaged flow rate of downward conduit compared to that of the upward (53.21 vs. 58.42 ml/min). After SCT, configurations with smaller angles between LCCA and LSA show better hemodynamic performance, with a maximum flow rate variation of 30.34 % in LSA from 50° to 110°.
Conclusions
Configurations with moderately smaller diameter, reduced length of prosthetic conduit and aligned anastomosis towards LCCA blood flow result in better LSA revascularization outcomes. The findings are supportive for optimizing CSB and SCT configurations.
期刊介绍:
To encourage the development of formal computing methods, and their application in biomedical research and medical practice, by illustration of fundamental principles in biomedical informatics research; to stimulate basic research into application software design; to report the state of research of biomedical information processing projects; to report new computer methodologies applied in biomedical areas; the eventual distribution of demonstrable software to avoid duplication of effort; to provide a forum for discussion and improvement of existing software; to optimize contact between national organizations and regional user groups by promoting an international exchange of information on formal methods, standards and software in biomedicine.
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine covers computing methodology and software systems derived from computing science for implementation in all aspects of biomedical research and medical practice. It is designed to serve: biochemists; biologists; geneticists; immunologists; neuroscientists; pharmacologists; toxicologists; clinicians; epidemiologists; psychiatrists; psychologists; cardiologists; chemists; (radio)physicists; computer scientists; programmers and systems analysts; biomedical, clinical, electrical and other engineers; teachers of medical informatics and users of educational software.