{"title":"氧化渗滤液循环增强城市生活垃圾稳定和垃圾填埋场空间回收:实验室规模的生物反应器的见解","authors":"Arnab Ghosh, Jurng-Jae Yee, Sung Hyuk Park","doi":"10.1007/s11270-025-07769-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study investigates aerobic landfill stabilization using three bioreactors with different operational modes: R1 with oxygenated (~ 90% pure oxygen) leachate recirculation and waste mass aeration, R2 with conventional leachate recirculation (without oxygenation) and waste mass aeration, and R3 as an anaerobic control. The waste stabilization was assessed by reductions in COD, ammonia nitrogen, NOx (nitrate and nitrite nitrogen), and total phosphorus removal, as well as reductions in volatile solids and subsidence of waste height. Among the three reactors, R1 exhibited the best performance, with ~ 85% COD removal efficiency likely due to the high DO content during leachate recirculation. Additionally, R1 achieved ~ 99% removal efficiency of ammonia nitrogen through rapid aerobic nitrification. An exponential attenuation model was applied to describe the degradation of organic substances, with degradation rates of COD and NH<sub>3</sub>-N increasing from 0.005 and 0.007 d⁻<sup>1</sup> to 0.01 and 0.021 d⁻<sup>1</sup>, respectively, when leachate recirculation and oxygenation were applied. Reactor R1 could meet the COD emission limit of 150 mg/L, as specified by WHO surface water regulations, by day 478, while reactors R2 and R3 are expected to achieve this level by days 567 and 742, respectively. The results indicated that the aerobic conditions in R1, supplemented with pure oxygen (~ 90%) aeration, elicited rapid stabilization of the simulated landfill waste, reflected by a high waste settlement of ~ 63.5%. The findings suggest that this strategy can improve landfill stabilization in practice, optimize landfill space reuse, and enhance MSW management by reducing the load on existing leachate treatment facilities.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":808,"journal":{"name":"Water, Air, & Soil Pollution","volume":"236 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Oxygenated Leachate Recirculation for Enhanced MSW Stabilization and Landfill Space Reclamation: Lab-Scale Bioreactor Insights\",\"authors\":\"Arnab Ghosh, Jurng-Jae Yee, Sung Hyuk Park\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11270-025-07769-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This study investigates aerobic landfill stabilization using three bioreactors with different operational modes: R1 with oxygenated (~ 90% pure oxygen) leachate recirculation and waste mass aeration, R2 with conventional leachate recirculation (without oxygenation) and waste mass aeration, and R3 as an anaerobic control. The waste stabilization was assessed by reductions in COD, ammonia nitrogen, NOx (nitrate and nitrite nitrogen), and total phosphorus removal, as well as reductions in volatile solids and subsidence of waste height. Among the three reactors, R1 exhibited the best performance, with ~ 85% COD removal efficiency likely due to the high DO content during leachate recirculation. Additionally, R1 achieved ~ 99% removal efficiency of ammonia nitrogen through rapid aerobic nitrification. An exponential attenuation model was applied to describe the degradation of organic substances, with degradation rates of COD and NH<sub>3</sub>-N increasing from 0.005 and 0.007 d⁻<sup>1</sup> to 0.01 and 0.021 d⁻<sup>1</sup>, respectively, when leachate recirculation and oxygenation were applied. Reactor R1 could meet the COD emission limit of 150 mg/L, as specified by WHO surface water regulations, by day 478, while reactors R2 and R3 are expected to achieve this level by days 567 and 742, respectively. The results indicated that the aerobic conditions in R1, supplemented with pure oxygen (~ 90%) aeration, elicited rapid stabilization of the simulated landfill waste, reflected by a high waste settlement of ~ 63.5%. The findings suggest that this strategy can improve landfill stabilization in practice, optimize landfill space reuse, and enhance MSW management by reducing the load on existing leachate treatment facilities.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":808,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Water, Air, & Soil Pollution\",\"volume\":\"236 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Water, Air, & Soil Pollution\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"6\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11270-025-07769-7\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water, Air, & Soil Pollution","FirstCategoryId":"6","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11270-025-07769-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本研究采用三种不同运行模式的生物反应器进行好氧垃圾填埋场稳定化研究:R1加氧(~ 90%纯氧)渗滤液回灌和垃圾曝气,R2常规渗滤液回灌(不加氧)和垃圾曝气,R3作为厌氧控制。通过COD、氨氮、NOx(硝态氮和亚硝酸盐氮)、总磷去除率的降低、挥发性固体的减少和废物高度的降低来评估废物的稳定性。在3个反应器中,R1表现最好,COD去除率达到~ 85%,这可能是由于在渗滤液回灌过程中DO含量较高。此外,R1通过快速好氧硝化对氨氮的去除率达到~ 99%。采用指数衰减模型来描述有机物的降解,当采用渗滤液循环和氧合时,COD和NH3-N的降解率分别从0.005和0.007 d - 1增加到0.01和0.021 d - 1。反应器R1可在第478天达到WHO地表水法规规定的COD排放限值150 mg/L,反应器R2和R3预计分别在第567天和第742天达到该限值。结果表明,在R1中的好氧条件下,添加纯氧(~ 90%)曝气,可以使模拟垃圾填埋场的垃圾快速稳定,其沉降率高达~ 63.5%。研究结果表明,该策略在实践中可以通过减少现有渗滤液处理设施的负荷来改善垃圾填埋场的稳定性,优化垃圾填埋场空间的再利用,并加强城市生活垃圾的管理。
Oxygenated Leachate Recirculation for Enhanced MSW Stabilization and Landfill Space Reclamation: Lab-Scale Bioreactor Insights
This study investigates aerobic landfill stabilization using three bioreactors with different operational modes: R1 with oxygenated (~ 90% pure oxygen) leachate recirculation and waste mass aeration, R2 with conventional leachate recirculation (without oxygenation) and waste mass aeration, and R3 as an anaerobic control. The waste stabilization was assessed by reductions in COD, ammonia nitrogen, NOx (nitrate and nitrite nitrogen), and total phosphorus removal, as well as reductions in volatile solids and subsidence of waste height. Among the three reactors, R1 exhibited the best performance, with ~ 85% COD removal efficiency likely due to the high DO content during leachate recirculation. Additionally, R1 achieved ~ 99% removal efficiency of ammonia nitrogen through rapid aerobic nitrification. An exponential attenuation model was applied to describe the degradation of organic substances, with degradation rates of COD and NH3-N increasing from 0.005 and 0.007 d⁻1 to 0.01 and 0.021 d⁻1, respectively, when leachate recirculation and oxygenation were applied. Reactor R1 could meet the COD emission limit of 150 mg/L, as specified by WHO surface water regulations, by day 478, while reactors R2 and R3 are expected to achieve this level by days 567 and 742, respectively. The results indicated that the aerobic conditions in R1, supplemented with pure oxygen (~ 90%) aeration, elicited rapid stabilization of the simulated landfill waste, reflected by a high waste settlement of ~ 63.5%. The findings suggest that this strategy can improve landfill stabilization in practice, optimize landfill space reuse, and enhance MSW management by reducing the load on existing leachate treatment facilities.
期刊介绍:
Water, Air, & Soil Pollution is an international, interdisciplinary journal on all aspects of pollution and solutions to pollution in the biosphere. This includes chemical, physical and biological processes affecting flora, fauna, water, air and soil in relation to environmental pollution. Because of its scope, the subject areas are diverse and include all aspects of pollution sources, transport, deposition, accumulation, acid precipitation, atmospheric pollution, metals, aquatic pollution including marine pollution and ground water, waste water, pesticides, soil pollution, sewage, sediment pollution, forestry pollution, effects of pollutants on humans, vegetation, fish, aquatic species, micro-organisms, and animals, environmental and molecular toxicology applied to pollution research, biosensors, global and climate change, ecological implications of pollution and pollution models. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution also publishes manuscripts on novel methods used in the study of environmental pollutants, environmental toxicology, environmental biology, novel environmental engineering related to pollution, biodiversity as influenced by pollution, novel environmental biotechnology as applied to pollution (e.g. bioremediation), environmental modelling and biorestoration of polluted environments.
Articles should not be submitted that are of local interest only and do not advance international knowledge in environmental pollution and solutions to pollution. Articles that simply replicate known knowledge or techniques while researching a local pollution problem will normally be rejected without review. Submitted articles must have up-to-date references, employ the correct experimental replication and statistical analysis, where needed and contain a significant contribution to new knowledge. The publishing and editorial team sincerely appreciate your cooperation.
Water, Air, & Soil Pollution publishes research papers; review articles; mini-reviews; and book reviews.