分层的临床影响,药剂师驱动的远程患者监测协议利用自测血压读数

IF 1.5 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Journal of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy : JACCP Pub Date : 2024-12-10 DOI:10.1002/jac5.2059
Zachary Hovis Pharm.D., Ryan Hanson M.S., Erin DeJarlais DPT, MBA
{"title":"分层的临床影响,药剂师驱动的远程患者监测协议利用自测血压读数","authors":"Zachary Hovis Pharm.D.,&nbsp;Ryan Hanson M.S.,&nbsp;Erin DeJarlais DPT, MBA","doi":"10.1002/jac5.2059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Pairing self-measured blood pressure (SMBP) with protocolized, non-physician follow-up consistently improves hypertension (HTN) management. However, these interventions are often resource-intensive and rely on a degree of technological proficiency that may exclude a vulnerable subset of the population.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>The primary objective of this study was to determine the rate of attainment of blood pressure (BP) control (defined as &lt;140/&lt;90 mmHg) based on the most recent clinic-measured BP readings 12 months or more after enrollment in the Digital Care Monitoring program. The secondary objective was to determine if there was a difference between the most recent clinic-measured systolic and diastolic BP readings before enrollment compared with 12 months or more after the enrollment eligibility period.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This study examined the impact of a tiered, non-physician SMBP program, engaging patients through a familiar communication medium to relay home BP readings. A pre-post quality improvement study was conducted in the outpatient arm of an integrated delivery network. Patients meeting selection criteria were invited to voluntarily enroll bi-monthly from October 2021 to July 2023. Patients consenting to enrollment received reminders twice weekly to respond with home BP readings, and an outreach protocol was established utilizing a medical assistant and clinical pharmacist.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The rate of attainment of BP control 12 months or more after the enrollment eligibility period was found to be 79.2% (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.01). BP dropped significantly over the 12-month treatment course with a mean systolic BP difference of 19.97 mmHg (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) and a mean diastolic BP difference of 12.34 mmHg (p &lt; 0.001).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The results indicate that a tiered, pharmacist-driven remote patient monitoring protocol utilizing SMBP readings is an effective management strategy to reduce BP in patients with uncontrolled HTN.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":73966,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy : JACCP","volume":"8 1","pages":"6-11"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical impact of a tiered, pharmacist-driven remote patient monitoring protocol utilizing self-measured blood pressure readings\",\"authors\":\"Zachary Hovis Pharm.D.,&nbsp;Ryan Hanson M.S.,&nbsp;Erin DeJarlais DPT, MBA\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jac5.2059\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>Pairing self-measured blood pressure (SMBP) with protocolized, non-physician follow-up consistently improves hypertension (HTN) management. However, these interventions are often resource-intensive and rely on a degree of technological proficiency that may exclude a vulnerable subset of the population.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>The primary objective of this study was to determine the rate of attainment of blood pressure (BP) control (defined as &lt;140/&lt;90 mmHg) based on the most recent clinic-measured BP readings 12 months or more after enrollment in the Digital Care Monitoring program. The secondary objective was to determine if there was a difference between the most recent clinic-measured systolic and diastolic BP readings before enrollment compared with 12 months or more after the enrollment eligibility period.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study examined the impact of a tiered, non-physician SMBP program, engaging patients through a familiar communication medium to relay home BP readings. A pre-post quality improvement study was conducted in the outpatient arm of an integrated delivery network. Patients meeting selection criteria were invited to voluntarily enroll bi-monthly from October 2021 to July 2023. Patients consenting to enrollment received reminders twice weekly to respond with home BP readings, and an outreach protocol was established utilizing a medical assistant and clinical pharmacist.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>The rate of attainment of BP control 12 months or more after the enrollment eligibility period was found to be 79.2% (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.01). BP dropped significantly over the 12-month treatment course with a mean systolic BP difference of 19.97 mmHg (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) and a mean diastolic BP difference of 12.34 mmHg (p &lt; 0.001).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>The results indicate that a tiered, pharmacist-driven remote patient monitoring protocol utilizing SMBP readings is an effective management strategy to reduce BP in patients with uncontrolled HTN.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73966,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy : JACCP\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"6-11\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy : JACCP\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://accpjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jac5.2059\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy : JACCP","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://accpjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jac5.2059","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

将自测血压(SMBP)与协议化的非医师随访相结合,可以持续改善高血压(HTN)的管理。然而,这些干预措施往往是资源密集型的,依赖于一定程度的技术熟练程度,可能会将人口中的弱势群体排除在外。本研究的主要目的是根据参加数字护理监测项目后12个月或更长时间的最新临床测量血压读数,确定血压(BP)控制率(定义为140/ 90 mmHg)。次要目的是确定入组前最新临床测量的收缩压和舒张压读数与入组合格期后12个月或更长时间的血压读数之间是否存在差异。方法:本研究考察了分层、非医师SMBP项目的影响,通过熟悉的沟通媒介与患者交流家庭血压读数。在综合递送网络的门诊部门进行了一项岗前质量改进研究。符合选择标准的患者被邀请在2021年10月至2023年7月期间每两个月自愿入组。同意入组的患者每周收到两次家庭血压读数提醒,并建立了利用医疗助理和临床药剂师的外展协议。结果入组12个月及以上血压控制率为79.2% (p < 0.01)。在12个月的治疗过程中,血压显著下降,平均收缩压差为19.97 mmHg (p < 0.001),平均舒张压差为12.34 mmHg (p < 0.001)。结论利用SMBP读数的分层、药剂师驱动的远程患者监测方案是降低未控制HTN患者血压的有效管理策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Clinical impact of a tiered, pharmacist-driven remote patient monitoring protocol utilizing self-measured blood pressure readings

Introduction

Pairing self-measured blood pressure (SMBP) with protocolized, non-physician follow-up consistently improves hypertension (HTN) management. However, these interventions are often resource-intensive and rely on a degree of technological proficiency that may exclude a vulnerable subset of the population.

Objectives

The primary objective of this study was to determine the rate of attainment of blood pressure (BP) control (defined as <140/<90 mmHg) based on the most recent clinic-measured BP readings 12 months or more after enrollment in the Digital Care Monitoring program. The secondary objective was to determine if there was a difference between the most recent clinic-measured systolic and diastolic BP readings before enrollment compared with 12 months or more after the enrollment eligibility period.

Methods

This study examined the impact of a tiered, non-physician SMBP program, engaging patients through a familiar communication medium to relay home BP readings. A pre-post quality improvement study was conducted in the outpatient arm of an integrated delivery network. Patients meeting selection criteria were invited to voluntarily enroll bi-monthly from October 2021 to July 2023. Patients consenting to enrollment received reminders twice weekly to respond with home BP readings, and an outreach protocol was established utilizing a medical assistant and clinical pharmacist.

Results

The rate of attainment of BP control 12 months or more after the enrollment eligibility period was found to be 79.2% (p < 0.01). BP dropped significantly over the 12-month treatment course with a mean systolic BP difference of 19.97 mmHg (p < 0.001) and a mean diastolic BP difference of 12.34 mmHg (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

The results indicate that a tiered, pharmacist-driven remote patient monitoring protocol utilizing SMBP readings is an effective management strategy to reduce BP in patients with uncontrolled HTN.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Importance of Residency Training for the Provision of Comprehensive Clinical Pharmacy Services. Pharmacy-Based Immunization Delivery: A Comprehensive History and Current Challenges. Comment on "The Clinical Pharmacist as Principal Investigator-2026". Impact of a First-Year Doctor of Pharmacy Seminar Course on Stigmatizing Beliefs: A Qualitative Analysis. Comparing Pharmacist-Managed Warfarin Versus Usual Care in HeartMate 3 Patients: A Multicenter Retrospective Observational Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1