{"title":"回顾发现辅助门诊治疗结果的研究存在重大差距","authors":"Gary Enos","doi":"10.1002/mhw.34302","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Nearly every state authorizes some form of mandated outpatient mental health treatment through a civil court process, but the existing research into the effectiveness of these assisted outpatient treatment (AOT) programs has left a great deal unanswered, according to authors of a newly published review. Among the identified gaps, studies have looked into a limited number of jurisdictions and have largely failed to capture program participants' experiences in these programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":100916,"journal":{"name":"Mental Health Weekly","volume":"35 3","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Review finds significant gaps in research on AOT outcomes\",\"authors\":\"Gary Enos\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/mhw.34302\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Nearly every state authorizes some form of mandated outpatient mental health treatment through a civil court process, but the existing research into the effectiveness of these assisted outpatient treatment (AOT) programs has left a great deal unanswered, according to authors of a newly published review. Among the identified gaps, studies have looked into a limited number of jurisdictions and have largely failed to capture program participants' experiences in these programs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100916,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mental Health Weekly\",\"volume\":\"35 3\",\"pages\":\"1-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mental Health Weekly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mhw.34302\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mental Health Weekly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mhw.34302","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Review finds significant gaps in research on AOT outcomes
Nearly every state authorizes some form of mandated outpatient mental health treatment through a civil court process, but the existing research into the effectiveness of these assisted outpatient treatment (AOT) programs has left a great deal unanswered, according to authors of a newly published review. Among the identified gaps, studies have looked into a limited number of jurisdictions and have largely failed to capture program participants' experiences in these programs.