回顾发现辅助门诊治疗结果的研究存在重大差距

Gary Enos
{"title":"回顾发现辅助门诊治疗结果的研究存在重大差距","authors":"Gary Enos","doi":"10.1002/mhw.34302","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Nearly every state authorizes some form of mandated outpatient mental health treatment through a civil court process, but the existing research into the effectiveness of these assisted outpatient treatment (AOT) programs has left a great deal unanswered, according to authors of a newly published review. Among the identified gaps, studies have looked into a limited number of jurisdictions and have largely failed to capture program participants' experiences in these programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":100916,"journal":{"name":"Mental Health Weekly","volume":"35 3","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Review finds significant gaps in research on AOT outcomes\",\"authors\":\"Gary Enos\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/mhw.34302\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Nearly every state authorizes some form of mandated outpatient mental health treatment through a civil court process, but the existing research into the effectiveness of these assisted outpatient treatment (AOT) programs has left a great deal unanswered, according to authors of a newly published review. Among the identified gaps, studies have looked into a limited number of jurisdictions and have largely failed to capture program participants' experiences in these programs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100916,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mental Health Weekly\",\"volume\":\"35 3\",\"pages\":\"1-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mental Health Weekly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mhw.34302\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mental Health Weekly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mhw.34302","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

根据一篇新发表的评论的作者,几乎每个州都通过民事法庭程序授权某种形式的强制性门诊精神健康治疗,但现有的关于这些辅助门诊治疗(AOT)项目有效性的研究留下了很多悬而未决的问题。在已确定的差距中,研究调查了有限数量的司法管辖区,并且在很大程度上未能捕捉项目参与者在这些项目中的经验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Review finds significant gaps in research on AOT outcomes

Nearly every state authorizes some form of mandated outpatient mental health treatment through a civil court process, but the existing research into the effectiveness of these assisted outpatient treatment (AOT) programs has left a great deal unanswered, according to authors of a newly published review. Among the identified gaps, studies have looked into a limited number of jurisdictions and have largely failed to capture program participants' experiences in these programs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Correction School phone bans improve conduct, not mental health outcomes Coming Up… HHS unveils $700M to expand behavioral health, housing effort Study explores online training to expand mental health care
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1