{"title":"白内障手术和玻璃体切除术中眼外液的细菌污染和抗生素敏感性","authors":"Seung Min Lee","doi":"10.1111/aos.17137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <p><b>Aims/Purpose:</b> We performed a retrospective case-series study to investigate the extent of bacterial contamination and antibiotic susceptibility of extraocular fluid at the beginning and end of cataract surgery and vitrectomy after disinfection.</p>\n \n <p><b>Methods:</b> Medical records of consecutive patients who underwent cataract surgery or vitrectomy with extraocular fluid culture were reviewed. Patients with infection, recent ocular trauma, immunocompromised state, or antibiotics treatment were excluded. During surgical skin preparation, povidone-iodine (PvI) was poured through palpebral fissure was done. At the initiation, a flush of PvI and BSS irrigation was added into the conjunctival sac. 1ml of fluid was collected at the beginning (Pre-fluid) and end of the surgery (Post-fluid). Sample were collected from both canthi while instilling BSS. The samples were injected into the BacT/Alert PF pediatric blood culture bottle. Bacterial identification and antibiotics susceptibility test were performed. The χ<sup>2</sup> test or Fisher's exact test was performed to determine differences in results depending on surgical method or timing of sample collection.</p>\n \n <p><b>Results:</b> Two hundred thirty-three eyes were enrolled, including 72 eyes with cataract surgery and 161 eyes with vitrectomy. There were 31 (13.3%) positive cultures in Pre-fluid and 71 (30.5%) positive cultures in Post-fluid. The positive culture rate was higher in Post-fluid (<i>p</i> < 0.001, χ<sup>2</sup> test). The following organisms were frequently identified: Staphylococcus epidermidis (sample size <i>N</i> = 74), S. aureus (<i>N</i> = 10) and S. lugdunensis (<i>N</i> = 6). All types of strains didn’t showed resistance to vancomycin or 3<sup>rd</sup> generation cephalosporin.</p>\n \n <p><b>Conclusions:</b> Despite disinfection in ocular surgery, bacterial contamination may occur at the surgical site, and bacterial contamination was confirmed more frequently at the end of surgery. The most common organism was S. epidermidis, and most of them were susceptible to empirical antibiotics.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":6915,"journal":{"name":"Acta Ophthalmologica","volume":"103 S284","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aos.17137","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bacterial contamination of extraocular fluid and antibiotic susceptibility during cataract surgery and vitrectomy\",\"authors\":\"Seung Min Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/aos.17137\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <p><b>Aims/Purpose:</b> We performed a retrospective case-series study to investigate the extent of bacterial contamination and antibiotic susceptibility of extraocular fluid at the beginning and end of cataract surgery and vitrectomy after disinfection.</p>\\n \\n <p><b>Methods:</b> Medical records of consecutive patients who underwent cataract surgery or vitrectomy with extraocular fluid culture were reviewed. Patients with infection, recent ocular trauma, immunocompromised state, or antibiotics treatment were excluded. During surgical skin preparation, povidone-iodine (PvI) was poured through palpebral fissure was done. At the initiation, a flush of PvI and BSS irrigation was added into the conjunctival sac. 1ml of fluid was collected at the beginning (Pre-fluid) and end of the surgery (Post-fluid). Sample were collected from both canthi while instilling BSS. The samples were injected into the BacT/Alert PF pediatric blood culture bottle. Bacterial identification and antibiotics susceptibility test were performed. The χ<sup>2</sup> test or Fisher's exact test was performed to determine differences in results depending on surgical method or timing of sample collection.</p>\\n \\n <p><b>Results:</b> Two hundred thirty-three eyes were enrolled, including 72 eyes with cataract surgery and 161 eyes with vitrectomy. There were 31 (13.3%) positive cultures in Pre-fluid and 71 (30.5%) positive cultures in Post-fluid. The positive culture rate was higher in Post-fluid (<i>p</i> < 0.001, χ<sup>2</sup> test). The following organisms were frequently identified: Staphylococcus epidermidis (sample size <i>N</i> = 74), S. aureus (<i>N</i> = 10) and S. lugdunensis (<i>N</i> = 6). All types of strains didn’t showed resistance to vancomycin or 3<sup>rd</sup> generation cephalosporin.</p>\\n \\n <p><b>Conclusions:</b> Despite disinfection in ocular surgery, bacterial contamination may occur at the surgical site, and bacterial contamination was confirmed more frequently at the end of surgery. The most common organism was S. epidermidis, and most of them were susceptible to empirical antibiotics.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":6915,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Ophthalmologica\",\"volume\":\"103 S284\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aos.17137\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Ophthalmologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aos.17137\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Ophthalmologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aos.17137","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Bacterial contamination of extraocular fluid and antibiotic susceptibility during cataract surgery and vitrectomy
Aims/Purpose: We performed a retrospective case-series study to investigate the extent of bacterial contamination and antibiotic susceptibility of extraocular fluid at the beginning and end of cataract surgery and vitrectomy after disinfection.
Methods: Medical records of consecutive patients who underwent cataract surgery or vitrectomy with extraocular fluid culture were reviewed. Patients with infection, recent ocular trauma, immunocompromised state, or antibiotics treatment were excluded. During surgical skin preparation, povidone-iodine (PvI) was poured through palpebral fissure was done. At the initiation, a flush of PvI and BSS irrigation was added into the conjunctival sac. 1ml of fluid was collected at the beginning (Pre-fluid) and end of the surgery (Post-fluid). Sample were collected from both canthi while instilling BSS. The samples were injected into the BacT/Alert PF pediatric blood culture bottle. Bacterial identification and antibiotics susceptibility test were performed. The χ2 test or Fisher's exact test was performed to determine differences in results depending on surgical method or timing of sample collection.
Results: Two hundred thirty-three eyes were enrolled, including 72 eyes with cataract surgery and 161 eyes with vitrectomy. There were 31 (13.3%) positive cultures in Pre-fluid and 71 (30.5%) positive cultures in Post-fluid. The positive culture rate was higher in Post-fluid (p < 0.001, χ2 test). The following organisms were frequently identified: Staphylococcus epidermidis (sample size N = 74), S. aureus (N = 10) and S. lugdunensis (N = 6). All types of strains didn’t showed resistance to vancomycin or 3rd generation cephalosporin.
Conclusions: Despite disinfection in ocular surgery, bacterial contamination may occur at the surgical site, and bacterial contamination was confirmed more frequently at the end of surgery. The most common organism was S. epidermidis, and most of them were susceptible to empirical antibiotics.
期刊介绍:
Acta Ophthalmologica is published on behalf of the Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica Foundation and is the official scientific publication of the following societies: The Danish Ophthalmological Society, The Finnish Ophthalmological Society, The Icelandic Ophthalmological Society, The Norwegian Ophthalmological Society and The Swedish Ophthalmological Society, and also the European Association for Vision and Eye Research (EVER).
Acta Ophthalmologica publishes clinical and experimental original articles, reviews, editorials, educational photo essays (Diagnosis and Therapy in Ophthalmology), case reports and case series, letters to the editor and doctoral theses.