IF 2.8 2区 生物学 Q2 ECOLOGY Freshwater Biology Pub Date : 2025-01-19 DOI:10.1111/fwb.14383
Lei Li, Sabine Hilt, Mingming Ding
{"title":"Contrasting Effects of Increasing Invasive Crayfish Densities on Competing Submerged Macrophytes in Shallow Lakes","authors":"Lei Li,&nbsp;Sabine Hilt,&nbsp;Mingming Ding","doi":"10.1111/fwb.14383","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>\n \n </p><ol>\n \n \n <li>Non-native crayfish are among the most widespread aquatic invasive species worldwide. High densities of crayfish in lakes can potentially cause complete loss of macrophytes through herbivory, physical destruction, shading by suspension of sediments and nutrient release facilitating phytoplankton, thus altering ecosystem state and functions. However, lower crayfish densities may affect different macrophyte species in different ways, thus altering competition between macrophyte species with different growth forms. We hypothesize that high crayfish densities can completely destroy submerged macrophyte communities and shift systems into more turbid conditions whereas low crayfish densities can promote low-growing macrophytes that compete with canopy-forming species.</li>\n \n \n <li>To test these hypotheses, we applied three different densities (2, 4, 8 crayfish m<sup>−2</sup>) of the invasive crayfish <i>Procambarus clarkii</i> and a control (no crayfish) to 36 mesocosms of monocultures and mixed stands of low-growing and canopy-forming submerged macrophytes for 60 days. We measured concentrations of nutrients, suspended solids, phytoplankton and periphyton and above- and belowground biomass of low-growing <i>Vallisneria natans</i> and canopy-forming <i>Hydrilla verticillata</i>.</li>\n \n \n <li>In addition, we conducted a meta-analysis of crayfish impacts on macrophytes to compare effect sizes between different crayfish densities. Using data from published studies, we derived the relationship between crayfish density and crayfish-induced reductions in macrophyte abundance.</li>\n \n \n <li>Our meta-analysis revealed a significant decline of macrophytes with increasing crayfish densities. In line with existing studies, high crayfish densities caused a strong loss of both low-growing and canopy-forming macrophytes and increased nutrient concentrations, phytoplankton biomass and suspended sediment, thus favouring an ecosystem shift to more turbid conditions. Low and medium crayfish densities reduced macrophyte biomass similarly for both species in monocultures. However, in mixed cultures, low crayfish densities (2 crayfish m<sup>−2</sup>) reduced the above- and belowground biomass of the canopy-forming <i>H. verticillata</i> more than that of low-growing <i>V. natans</i>, supporting our hypothesis. This support of low-growing macrophytes occurred despite a temporal facilitation of shading by increased periphyton biomass.</li>\n \n \n <li>Our results show that the impact of crayfish invasions on aquatic ecosystems is strongly dependent on their density. High densities facilitate the loss of macrophytes and increase the likelihood of ecosystem collapse into a turbid state. However, low densities can provide a competitive advantage to low-growing macrophytes that would otherwise be outcompeted by canopy-forming species. Although complete eradication is often impossible, management of invasive crayfish can target densities that have potentially positive effects on invaded ecosystems.</li>\n </ol>\n \n </div>","PeriodicalId":12365,"journal":{"name":"Freshwater Biology","volume":"70 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Freshwater Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/fwb.14383","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

非本地螯虾是全球最广泛的水生入侵物种之一。小龙虾在湖泊中的高密度可能会通过食草、物理破坏、沉积物悬浮遮蔽和营养释放促进浮游植物生长等方式导致大型植物完全消失,从而改变生态系统的状态和功能。然而,较低的小龙虾密度可能会以不同的方式影响不同的大型水草物种,从而改变不同生长形式的大型水草物种之间的竞争。我们假设,小龙虾的高密度会彻底破坏沉水大型植物群落,使系统进入更加浑浊的状态,而小龙虾的低密度则会促进低矮大型植物的生长,从而与形成冠层的物种竞争。 为了验证这些假设,我们在 36 个单一种植和低生长及形成冠层的沉水大型植物混合丛生的中置培养箱中,施用了三种不同密度(2、4、8 螯虾 m-2)的入侵螯虾 Procambarus clarkii 和对照组(无螯虾),为期 60 天。我们测量了营养物质、悬浮固体、浮游植物和浮游植物的浓度,以及低矮生长的 Vallisneria natans 和冠层形成的 Hydrilla verticillata 的地上和地下生物量。 此外,我们还对小龙虾对大型植物的影响进行了荟萃分析,以比较不同小龙虾密度之间的影响大小。利用已发表的研究数据,我们得出了螯虾密度与螯虾导致的大型水草丰度下降之间的关系。 我们的荟萃分析表明,随着螯虾密度的增加,大型底栖生物的数量显著减少。与现有研究一致的是,小龙虾的高密度会导致低矮巨藻和形成冠层的巨藻大量减少,并增加营养浓度、浮游植物生物量和悬浮沉积物,从而有利于生态系统向更浑浊的条件转变。在单一养殖中,低密度和中等密度的螯虾同样会减少两种大型底栖生物的生物量。然而,在混合养殖中,低螯虾密度(2 只螯虾 m-2)比低生长的 V. natans 更能减少形成冠层的 H. verticillata 的地上和地下生物量,这支持了我们的假设。尽管围岩生物量的增加在时间上促进了遮荫作用,但这种对低生长大型植物的支持仍然发生了。 我们的研究结果表明,小龙虾入侵对水生生态系统的影响在很大程度上取决于其密度。高密度会导致大型底栖生物的消失,增加生态系统陷入浑浊状态的可能性。不过,低密度也能为低矮的大型水草提供竞争优势,否则它们就会被形成冠层的物种所取代。虽然完全根除小龙虾通常是不可能的,但对入侵小龙虾的管理可以以对入侵生态系统有潜在积极影响的密度为目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Contrasting Effects of Increasing Invasive Crayfish Densities on Competing Submerged Macrophytes in Shallow Lakes

  1. Non-native crayfish are among the most widespread aquatic invasive species worldwide. High densities of crayfish in lakes can potentially cause complete loss of macrophytes through herbivory, physical destruction, shading by suspension of sediments and nutrient release facilitating phytoplankton, thus altering ecosystem state and functions. However, lower crayfish densities may affect different macrophyte species in different ways, thus altering competition between macrophyte species with different growth forms. We hypothesize that high crayfish densities can completely destroy submerged macrophyte communities and shift systems into more turbid conditions whereas low crayfish densities can promote low-growing macrophytes that compete with canopy-forming species.
  2. To test these hypotheses, we applied three different densities (2, 4, 8 crayfish m−2) of the invasive crayfish Procambarus clarkii and a control (no crayfish) to 36 mesocosms of monocultures and mixed stands of low-growing and canopy-forming submerged macrophytes for 60 days. We measured concentrations of nutrients, suspended solids, phytoplankton and periphyton and above- and belowground biomass of low-growing Vallisneria natans and canopy-forming Hydrilla verticillata.
  3. In addition, we conducted a meta-analysis of crayfish impacts on macrophytes to compare effect sizes between different crayfish densities. Using data from published studies, we derived the relationship between crayfish density and crayfish-induced reductions in macrophyte abundance.
  4. Our meta-analysis revealed a significant decline of macrophytes with increasing crayfish densities. In line with existing studies, high crayfish densities caused a strong loss of both low-growing and canopy-forming macrophytes and increased nutrient concentrations, phytoplankton biomass and suspended sediment, thus favouring an ecosystem shift to more turbid conditions. Low and medium crayfish densities reduced macrophyte biomass similarly for both species in monocultures. However, in mixed cultures, low crayfish densities (2 crayfish m−2) reduced the above- and belowground biomass of the canopy-forming H. verticillata more than that of low-growing V. natans, supporting our hypothesis. This support of low-growing macrophytes occurred despite a temporal facilitation of shading by increased periphyton biomass.
  5. Our results show that the impact of crayfish invasions on aquatic ecosystems is strongly dependent on their density. High densities facilitate the loss of macrophytes and increase the likelihood of ecosystem collapse into a turbid state. However, low densities can provide a competitive advantage to low-growing macrophytes that would otherwise be outcompeted by canopy-forming species. Although complete eradication is often impossible, management of invasive crayfish can target densities that have potentially positive effects on invaded ecosystems.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Freshwater Biology
Freshwater Biology 生物-海洋与淡水生物学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.70%
发文量
162
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Freshwater Biology publishes papers on all aspects of the ecology of inland waters, including rivers and lakes, ground waters, flood plains and other freshwater wetlands. We include studies of micro-organisms, algae, macrophytes, invertebrates, fish and other vertebrates, as well as those concerning whole systems and related physical and chemical aspects of the environment, provided that they have clear biological relevance. Studies may focus at any level in the ecological hierarchy from physiological ecology and animal behaviour, through population dynamics and evolutionary genetics, to community interactions, biogeography and ecosystem functioning. They may also be at any scale: from microhabitat to landscape, and continental to global. Preference is given to research, whether meta-analytical, experimental, theoretical or descriptive, highlighting causal (ecological) mechanisms from which clearly stated hypotheses are derived. Manuscripts with an experimental or conceptual flavour are particularly welcome, as are those or which integrate laboratory and field work, and studies from less well researched areas of the world. Priority is given to submissions that are likely to interest a wide range of readers. We encourage submission of papers well grounded in ecological theory that deal with issues related to the conservation and management of inland waters. Papers interpreting fundamental research in a way that makes clear its applied, strategic or socio-economic relevance are also welcome. Review articles (FRESHWATER BIOLOGY REVIEWS) and discussion papers (OPINION) are also invited: these enable authors to publish high-quality material outside the constraints of standard research papers.
期刊最新文献
Different Approaches to Measuring Diversity Affect the Strength of the Relationship Between Biodiversity and Ecosystem Function in Freshwater Studies: A Meta-Analysis Terrestrial Invertebrates Strike Back: Aerial and Ground-Based Colonisation of a Dry Riverbed Phylogenetic Origin of Morphologically Cryptic Species Shapes Co-Occurrence and Sympatry Patterns Cover Image Issue Information - Cover and Ed Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1