一套野生动物通道结构有助于哺乳动物穿越城市中的热带森林片区

IF 3 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY Ecosphere Pub Date : 2024-12-26 DOI:10.1002/ecs2.70114
Li Si Tay, Ruisheng Choo, Max D. Y. Khoo, Eunice Kong, Yi Xiang Chan, Wivian H. Y. Neo, Sebastian Ow, Yuet Hsin Toh, Han Ling, Malcolm C. K. Soh, Benjamin P. Y.-H. Lee, Adrian H. B. Loo, Kenneth B. H. Er
{"title":"一套野生动物通道结构有助于哺乳动物穿越城市中的热带森林片区","authors":"Li Si Tay,&nbsp;Ruisheng Choo,&nbsp;Max D. Y. Khoo,&nbsp;Eunice Kong,&nbsp;Yi Xiang Chan,&nbsp;Wivian H. Y. Neo,&nbsp;Sebastian Ow,&nbsp;Yuet Hsin Toh,&nbsp;Han Ling,&nbsp;Malcolm C. K. Soh,&nbsp;Benjamin P. Y.-H. Lee,&nbsp;Adrian H. B. Loo,&nbsp;Kenneth B. H. Er","doi":"10.1002/ecs2.70114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Wildlife crossing structures and road calming measures are frequently implemented to improve habitat connectivity and mitigate the risks of wildlife–vehicle collisions on roads. Although Southeast Asia is a known biodiversity hotspot, majority of studies assessing effectiveness of such structures were conducted outside the region. Existing studies also tended to be non-comparative and focused on crossing structures in silo. We addressed this gap by simultaneously surveying and comparing the usage frequency of mammals across three crossing types—culverts, roads and rope bridges—along a road surrounded by forests in Singapore. This allowed us to evaluate the preferences of mammals, assess usage patterns and investigate factors influencing the use of different crossing types. Using camera traps and closed-circuit televisions, we documented 1133 independent crossing events across a 9-month study period from March to November 2021. Fourteen mammal species were detected across all crossing types, with wild boar (<i>Sus scrofa</i>) being the most prevalent species (68.2%). Locally critically endangered species such as the Malayan porcupine (<i>Hystrix brachyura</i>), Sunda pangolin (<i>Manis javanica</i>), and Raffles' banded langur (<i>Presbytis femoralis femoralis</i>) were also recorded to use culverts, roads, and rope bridges for crossings, respectively. Although many species used multiple crossing types, most species had a preferred crossing method. Between culverts and roads, factors that influenced crossing preferences included group size for wild boars and time of day and presence of fences for other mammals. Even though such culverts were intended for drainage, they were still widely used by mammals. Overall, all three crossing methods were crucial in facilitating the movement of animals between habitats. Thus, a variety of infrastructure and measures to accommodate the diversity of wildlife moving across forest patches in a fragmented landscape is recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":48930,"journal":{"name":"Ecosphere","volume":"15 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ecs2.70114","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A suite of wildlife crossing structures facilitates mammal movement across tropical forest fragments in a city\",\"authors\":\"Li Si Tay,&nbsp;Ruisheng Choo,&nbsp;Max D. Y. Khoo,&nbsp;Eunice Kong,&nbsp;Yi Xiang Chan,&nbsp;Wivian H. Y. Neo,&nbsp;Sebastian Ow,&nbsp;Yuet Hsin Toh,&nbsp;Han Ling,&nbsp;Malcolm C. K. Soh,&nbsp;Benjamin P. Y.-H. Lee,&nbsp;Adrian H. B. Loo,&nbsp;Kenneth B. H. Er\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ecs2.70114\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Wildlife crossing structures and road calming measures are frequently implemented to improve habitat connectivity and mitigate the risks of wildlife–vehicle collisions on roads. Although Southeast Asia is a known biodiversity hotspot, majority of studies assessing effectiveness of such structures were conducted outside the region. Existing studies also tended to be non-comparative and focused on crossing structures in silo. We addressed this gap by simultaneously surveying and comparing the usage frequency of mammals across three crossing types—culverts, roads and rope bridges—along a road surrounded by forests in Singapore. This allowed us to evaluate the preferences of mammals, assess usage patterns and investigate factors influencing the use of different crossing types. Using camera traps and closed-circuit televisions, we documented 1133 independent crossing events across a 9-month study period from March to November 2021. Fourteen mammal species were detected across all crossing types, with wild boar (<i>Sus scrofa</i>) being the most prevalent species (68.2%). Locally critically endangered species such as the Malayan porcupine (<i>Hystrix brachyura</i>), Sunda pangolin (<i>Manis javanica</i>), and Raffles' banded langur (<i>Presbytis femoralis femoralis</i>) were also recorded to use culverts, roads, and rope bridges for crossings, respectively. Although many species used multiple crossing types, most species had a preferred crossing method. Between culverts and roads, factors that influenced crossing preferences included group size for wild boars and time of day and presence of fences for other mammals. Even though such culverts were intended for drainage, they were still widely used by mammals. Overall, all three crossing methods were crucial in facilitating the movement of animals between habitats. Thus, a variety of infrastructure and measures to accommodate the diversity of wildlife moving across forest patches in a fragmented landscape is recommended.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48930,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecosphere\",\"volume\":\"15 12\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ecs2.70114\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecosphere\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecs2.70114\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecosphere","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecs2.70114","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

经常实施野生动物穿越设施和道路平静措施,以改善栖息地的连通性并减轻道路上野生动物车辆碰撞的风险。虽然东南亚是一个已知的生物多样性热点地区,但大多数评估此类结构有效性的研究都是在该地区以外进行的。现有的研究也往往是非比较性的,并且侧重于筒仓中的交叉结构。我们通过同时调查和比较哺乳动物在新加坡一条被森林包围的道路上三种十字路口(涵洞、道路和索桥)上的使用频率来解决这一差距。这使我们能够评估哺乳动物的偏好,评估使用模式,并调查影响不同杂交类型使用的因素。利用摄像机陷阱和闭路电视,我们在2021年3月至11月的9个月研究期间记录了1133个独立的穿越事件。所有杂交类型共检出14种哺乳动物,其中野猪(Sus scrofa)最多,占68.2%。当地的极度濒危物种,如马来亚豪猪(Hystrix brachyura), Sunda穿山甲(Manis javanica)和莱佛士带叶猴(Presbytis femoralis femoralis)也分别记录使用涵洞,道路和索桥进行交叉。虽然许多物种使用多种杂交方式,但大多数物种有首选的杂交方式。在涵洞和道路之间,影响穿越偏好的因素包括野猪的群体规模、其他哺乳动物的时间和围栏的存在。尽管这些涵洞是用来排水的,但它们仍然被哺乳动物广泛使用。总的来说,这三种杂交方法对促进动物在栖息地之间的移动至关重要。因此,建议采取各种基础设施和措施,以适应在破碎景观中穿越森林斑块的野生动物的多样性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A suite of wildlife crossing structures facilitates mammal movement across tropical forest fragments in a city

Wildlife crossing structures and road calming measures are frequently implemented to improve habitat connectivity and mitigate the risks of wildlife–vehicle collisions on roads. Although Southeast Asia is a known biodiversity hotspot, majority of studies assessing effectiveness of such structures were conducted outside the region. Existing studies also tended to be non-comparative and focused on crossing structures in silo. We addressed this gap by simultaneously surveying and comparing the usage frequency of mammals across three crossing types—culverts, roads and rope bridges—along a road surrounded by forests in Singapore. This allowed us to evaluate the preferences of mammals, assess usage patterns and investigate factors influencing the use of different crossing types. Using camera traps and closed-circuit televisions, we documented 1133 independent crossing events across a 9-month study period from March to November 2021. Fourteen mammal species were detected across all crossing types, with wild boar (Sus scrofa) being the most prevalent species (68.2%). Locally critically endangered species such as the Malayan porcupine (Hystrix brachyura), Sunda pangolin (Manis javanica), and Raffles' banded langur (Presbytis femoralis femoralis) were also recorded to use culverts, roads, and rope bridges for crossings, respectively. Although many species used multiple crossing types, most species had a preferred crossing method. Between culverts and roads, factors that influenced crossing preferences included group size for wild boars and time of day and presence of fences for other mammals. Even though such culverts were intended for drainage, they were still widely used by mammals. Overall, all three crossing methods were crucial in facilitating the movement of animals between habitats. Thus, a variety of infrastructure and measures to accommodate the diversity of wildlife moving across forest patches in a fragmented landscape is recommended.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ecosphere
Ecosphere ECOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
378
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: The scope of Ecosphere is as broad as the science of ecology itself. The journal welcomes submissions from all sub-disciplines of ecological science, as well as interdisciplinary studies relating to ecology. The journal''s goal is to provide a rapid-publication, online-only, open-access alternative to ESA''s other journals, while maintaining the rigorous standards of peer review for which ESA publications are renowned.
期刊最新文献
Coming out(side): Challenges and supports experienced by LGBTQ+ undergraduates in field-based courses Key considerations for the use of satellite-based remote sensing for lake and reservoir research and management The growth of microbial ecology research in a selection of the Ecological Society of America's portfolio of journals Cover Image Issue Information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1