东非孕产妇保健的障碍和促进因素:对妇女、其家庭、医疗保健提供者和主要利益攸关方观点的系统审查和定性综合。

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth Pub Date : 2025-02-03 DOI:10.1186/s12884-025-07225-8
Manaye Yihune Teshale, Agegnehu Bante, Abebe Gedefaw Belete, Rik Crutzen, Mark Spigt, Sarah E Stutterheim
{"title":"东非孕产妇保健的障碍和促进因素:对妇女、其家庭、医疗保健提供者和主要利益攸关方观点的系统审查和定性综合。","authors":"Manaye Yihune Teshale, Agegnehu Bante, Abebe Gedefaw Belete, Rik Crutzen, Mark Spigt, Sarah E Stutterheim","doi":"10.1186/s12884-025-07225-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In East Africa, women face significant challenges accessing maternal healthcare during pregnancy, childbirth, and the postnatal period. While several studies have examined barriers and facilitators to maternal care, there is no comprehensive review reflecting the various perspectives of women, their families, healthcare providers, and key stakeholders. We systematically reviewed qualitative literature on maternal healthcare in East Africa, synthesizing insights from multiple perspectives and exploring barriers and facilitators across socioecological levels.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A qualitative evidence synthesis focused on studies from East Africa published between January 2015 and June 2024. We searched electronic databases, including PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane, Web of Science, and ProQuest, and used citation tracking to find additional references. Eligible studies were critically appraised using the Critical Appraisal Skills Program, and a thematic synthesis was performed to identify barriers and facilitators.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 3181 records identified, 81 studies (63 qualitative and 18 mixed method) met the inclusion criteria, representing 4816 individuals from six East African countries. This review identified barriers at various levels: individual barriers included a lack of awareness and knowledge, fear of being treated poorly, and financial constraints; interpersonal barriers comprised limited family support, communication challenges, and a lack of decision-making autonomy; health facility barriers included poor quality of healthcare, poor infrastructure, limited medical supplies, provider shortages, abusive behaviors from healthcare providers, lack of transportation, and high service costs; community-level barriers involved socio-cultural norms, societal stigma, and gender-based disparities; and policy-level barriers included poor focus on maternal health, a lack of male accompaniment policies, and conflicts. Key facilitators identified included improved healthcare understanding and women's self-efficacy at the individual level, family support and positive social influences at the interpersonal level, high-quality services, reliable transportation, compassionate care, and health education at the health facility level, community initiatives, gender equality, and maternity waiting homes at the community level, as well as free maternity services and health extension programs at the policy level.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The synthesis identified key barriers and facilitators to the maternal healthcare in East African countries, ranging from individual to policy levels. We recommend that future initiatives focus on addressing these barriers while enhancing facilitators across individual, interpersonal, health facility, community, and policy levels through woman-centered, evidence-based strategies. Moreover, fostering collaboration among governments, healthcare providers, and communities is essential for improving access to the maternal continuum of care.</p>","PeriodicalId":9033,"journal":{"name":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","volume":"25 1","pages":"111"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11792318/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Barriers and facilitators to maternal healthcare in East Africa: a systematic review and qualitative synthesis of perspectives from women, their families, healthcare providers, and key stakeholders.\",\"authors\":\"Manaye Yihune Teshale, Agegnehu Bante, Abebe Gedefaw Belete, Rik Crutzen, Mark Spigt, Sarah E Stutterheim\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12884-025-07225-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In East Africa, women face significant challenges accessing maternal healthcare during pregnancy, childbirth, and the postnatal period. While several studies have examined barriers and facilitators to maternal care, there is no comprehensive review reflecting the various perspectives of women, their families, healthcare providers, and key stakeholders. We systematically reviewed qualitative literature on maternal healthcare in East Africa, synthesizing insights from multiple perspectives and exploring barriers and facilitators across socioecological levels.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A qualitative evidence synthesis focused on studies from East Africa published between January 2015 and June 2024. We searched electronic databases, including PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane, Web of Science, and ProQuest, and used citation tracking to find additional references. Eligible studies were critically appraised using the Critical Appraisal Skills Program, and a thematic synthesis was performed to identify barriers and facilitators.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 3181 records identified, 81 studies (63 qualitative and 18 mixed method) met the inclusion criteria, representing 4816 individuals from six East African countries. This review identified barriers at various levels: individual barriers included a lack of awareness and knowledge, fear of being treated poorly, and financial constraints; interpersonal barriers comprised limited family support, communication challenges, and a lack of decision-making autonomy; health facility barriers included poor quality of healthcare, poor infrastructure, limited medical supplies, provider shortages, abusive behaviors from healthcare providers, lack of transportation, and high service costs; community-level barriers involved socio-cultural norms, societal stigma, and gender-based disparities; and policy-level barriers included poor focus on maternal health, a lack of male accompaniment policies, and conflicts. Key facilitators identified included improved healthcare understanding and women's self-efficacy at the individual level, family support and positive social influences at the interpersonal level, high-quality services, reliable transportation, compassionate care, and health education at the health facility level, community initiatives, gender equality, and maternity waiting homes at the community level, as well as free maternity services and health extension programs at the policy level.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The synthesis identified key barriers and facilitators to the maternal healthcare in East African countries, ranging from individual to policy levels. We recommend that future initiatives focus on addressing these barriers while enhancing facilitators across individual, interpersonal, health facility, community, and policy levels through woman-centered, evidence-based strategies. Moreover, fostering collaboration among governments, healthcare providers, and communities is essential for improving access to the maternal continuum of care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9033,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"111\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11792318/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-025-07225-8\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-025-07225-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在东非,妇女在怀孕、分娩和产后期间获得孕产妇保健面临重大挑战。虽然有几项研究调查了孕产妇保健的障碍和促进因素,但没有一项全面的审查反映了妇女、其家庭、医疗保健提供者和主要利益攸关方的各种观点。我们系统地回顾了关于东非孕产妇保健的定性文献,综合了来自多个角度的见解,并探索了跨社会生态层面的障碍和促进因素。方法:对2015年1月至2024年6月发表的东非研究进行定性证据综合。我们检索了电子数据库,包括PubMed、Embase、Scopus、Cochrane、Web of Science和ProQuest,并使用引文跟踪来查找其他参考文献。使用批判性评估技能计划对符合条件的研究进行了批判性评估,并进行了专题综合,以确定障碍和促进因素。结果:在确定的3181条记录中,81项研究(63项定性研究和18项混合研究)符合纳入标准,代表了来自6个东非国家的4816个人。这次审查确定了不同层次的障碍:个人障碍包括缺乏认识和知识、害怕受到不良待遇和财政拮据;人际障碍包括家庭支持有限、沟通困难和缺乏决策自主权;卫生设施障碍包括卫生保健质量差、基础设施差、医疗用品有限、提供者短缺、卫生保健提供者的虐待行为、交通不便和服务成本高;社区层面的障碍包括社会文化规范、社会耻辱和基于性别的差异;政策层面的障碍包括对孕产妇健康关注不够、缺乏男性陪伴政策和冲突。确定的主要促进因素包括:在个人层面上提高对保健的理解和妇女的自我效能感;在人际层面上家庭支持和积极的社会影响;在卫生设施层面上提供高质量的服务、可靠的交通、富有同情心的护理和健康教育;在社区层面上提供社区倡议、性别平等和待产之家;在政策层面上提供免费的产妇服务和健康推广方案。结论:综合分析确定了东非国家孕产妇保健的主要障碍和促进因素,从个人层面到政策层面。我们建议未来的举措侧重于解决这些障碍,同时通过以妇女为中心的循证战略,在个人、人际、卫生设施、社区和政策层面加强促进因素。此外,促进政府、卫生保健提供者和社区之间的合作对于改善获得孕产妇连续护理的机会至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Barriers and facilitators to maternal healthcare in East Africa: a systematic review and qualitative synthesis of perspectives from women, their families, healthcare providers, and key stakeholders.

Background: In East Africa, women face significant challenges accessing maternal healthcare during pregnancy, childbirth, and the postnatal period. While several studies have examined barriers and facilitators to maternal care, there is no comprehensive review reflecting the various perspectives of women, their families, healthcare providers, and key stakeholders. We systematically reviewed qualitative literature on maternal healthcare in East Africa, synthesizing insights from multiple perspectives and exploring barriers and facilitators across socioecological levels.

Methods: A qualitative evidence synthesis focused on studies from East Africa published between January 2015 and June 2024. We searched electronic databases, including PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane, Web of Science, and ProQuest, and used citation tracking to find additional references. Eligible studies were critically appraised using the Critical Appraisal Skills Program, and a thematic synthesis was performed to identify barriers and facilitators.

Results: Of the 3181 records identified, 81 studies (63 qualitative and 18 mixed method) met the inclusion criteria, representing 4816 individuals from six East African countries. This review identified barriers at various levels: individual barriers included a lack of awareness and knowledge, fear of being treated poorly, and financial constraints; interpersonal barriers comprised limited family support, communication challenges, and a lack of decision-making autonomy; health facility barriers included poor quality of healthcare, poor infrastructure, limited medical supplies, provider shortages, abusive behaviors from healthcare providers, lack of transportation, and high service costs; community-level barriers involved socio-cultural norms, societal stigma, and gender-based disparities; and policy-level barriers included poor focus on maternal health, a lack of male accompaniment policies, and conflicts. Key facilitators identified included improved healthcare understanding and women's self-efficacy at the individual level, family support and positive social influences at the interpersonal level, high-quality services, reliable transportation, compassionate care, and health education at the health facility level, community initiatives, gender equality, and maternity waiting homes at the community level, as well as free maternity services and health extension programs at the policy level.

Conclusion: The synthesis identified key barriers and facilitators to the maternal healthcare in East African countries, ranging from individual to policy levels. We recommend that future initiatives focus on addressing these barriers while enhancing facilitators across individual, interpersonal, health facility, community, and policy levels through woman-centered, evidence-based strategies. Moreover, fostering collaboration among governments, healthcare providers, and communities is essential for improving access to the maternal continuum of care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.50%
发文量
845
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Pregnancy & Childbirth is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of pregnancy and childbirth. The journal welcomes submissions on the biomedical aspects of pregnancy, breastfeeding, labor, maternal health, maternity care, trends and sociological aspects of pregnancy and childbirth.
期刊最新文献
Household cost of treating pregnancy-related complications in an urban setting: a study at the Korle Bu teaching hospital, Ghana. Determinants of birth preparedness and complication readiness among postpartum women in Bugembe, Jinja City, Eastern Uganda: a community-based cross-sectional study. The effect of an educational intervention based on the theory of planned behavior on breastfeeding behavior and self-efficacy in pregnant women in Iran: a quasi-experimental study. Cervical human papillomavirus positivity in hydatidiform mole and spontaneous miscarriage: a retrospective case-control study. Impact of placenta accreta spectrum and cesarean hysterectomy on quality of life and postpartum depression: a case-control study in Shiraz, Iran.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1