实施一种快速的宿主蛋白诊断试验,以区分到紧急护理中心就诊的成年人的细菌和病毒感染:一项实用的队列研究。

IF 8.7 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL BMC Medicine Pub Date : 2025-02-04 DOI:10.1186/s12916-025-03903-8
Boaz Kalmovich, Daniella Rahamim-Cohen, Ilan Yehoshua, Sara Kivity, Noam Orvieto, Shirley Shapiro Ben David
{"title":"实施一种快速的宿主蛋白诊断试验,以区分到紧急护理中心就诊的成年人的细菌和病毒感染:一项实用的队列研究。","authors":"Boaz Kalmovich, Daniella Rahamim-Cohen, Ilan Yehoshua, Sara Kivity, Noam Orvieto, Shirley Shapiro Ben David","doi":"10.1186/s12916-025-03903-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Urgent care centers (UCCs) are a growing segment of healthcare with high rates of inappropriate antibiotic use. MeMed BV® (MMBV) is a blood test that differentiates bacterial from viral infections. Between April 2022 and March 2023, we introduced MMBV into routine care at ten UCCs. The primary objective was to assess MMBV's impact on antibiotic use; the secondary objective was to assess whether MMBV aided in patient management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A pragmatic prospective cohort study. Physicians who ordered MMBV reported electronically (in real-time) whether they intended to prescribe antibiotics before ordering the test and upon UCC discharge whether MMBV aided in patient management. Hospitalizations were recorded for 7 days post-UCC discharge.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During implementation, 3920 MMBV tests were ordered for adults (age ≥ 18) by 144 physicians. The study cohort had 59% female patients and the median age was 42 years (IQR 31-58). For the primary objective, 3262 cases were included. MMBV indicated 629/3262 (19.3%) cases of potentially unwarranted antibiotics, of which physicians avoided prescriptions in 397/629 (63.1%). MMBV indicated 405/3262 (12.4%) cases of potentially missed bacterial infections. Physicians prescribed antibiotics to 283/405 (69.9%). MMBV adherence was associated with fewer hospitalizations (7.8% vs. 30.3%, p < 0.001). For the secondary objective, 2901 cases were included. Physicians reported MMBV aided patient management in 2494/2901 (86.0%) cases and contributed to avoiding emergency department referrals in 595/2901 (20.5%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Implementing MMBV aided urgent care center physicians in their clinical decision-making and may have contributed to appropriate antibiotic use, better resource utilization, and patient management.</p>","PeriodicalId":9188,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medicine","volume":"23 1","pages":"63"},"PeriodicalIF":8.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11792296/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implementation of a rapid host-protein diagnostic test for distinguishing bacterial and viral infections in adults presenting to urgent care centers: a pragmatic cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Boaz Kalmovich, Daniella Rahamim-Cohen, Ilan Yehoshua, Sara Kivity, Noam Orvieto, Shirley Shapiro Ben David\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12916-025-03903-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Urgent care centers (UCCs) are a growing segment of healthcare with high rates of inappropriate antibiotic use. MeMed BV® (MMBV) is a blood test that differentiates bacterial from viral infections. Between April 2022 and March 2023, we introduced MMBV into routine care at ten UCCs. The primary objective was to assess MMBV's impact on antibiotic use; the secondary objective was to assess whether MMBV aided in patient management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A pragmatic prospective cohort study. Physicians who ordered MMBV reported electronically (in real-time) whether they intended to prescribe antibiotics before ordering the test and upon UCC discharge whether MMBV aided in patient management. Hospitalizations were recorded for 7 days post-UCC discharge.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During implementation, 3920 MMBV tests were ordered for adults (age ≥ 18) by 144 physicians. The study cohort had 59% female patients and the median age was 42 years (IQR 31-58). For the primary objective, 3262 cases were included. MMBV indicated 629/3262 (19.3%) cases of potentially unwarranted antibiotics, of which physicians avoided prescriptions in 397/629 (63.1%). MMBV indicated 405/3262 (12.4%) cases of potentially missed bacterial infections. Physicians prescribed antibiotics to 283/405 (69.9%). MMBV adherence was associated with fewer hospitalizations (7.8% vs. 30.3%, p < 0.001). For the secondary objective, 2901 cases were included. Physicians reported MMBV aided patient management in 2494/2901 (86.0%) cases and contributed to avoiding emergency department referrals in 595/2901 (20.5%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Implementing MMBV aided urgent care center physicians in their clinical decision-making and may have contributed to appropriate antibiotic use, better resource utilization, and patient management.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9188,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Medicine\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"63\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11792296/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-025-03903-8\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-025-03903-8","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:紧急护理中心(UCCs)是一个日益增长的医疗保健部门,抗生素使用不当的比例很高。MeMed BV®(MMBV)是一种区分细菌和病毒感染的血液检查。在2022年4月至2023年3月期间,我们在10个ucc的常规护理中引入了MMBV。主要目的是评估MMBV对抗生素使用的影响;次要目的是评估MMBV是否有助于患者管理。方法:一项实用前瞻性队列研究。订购MMBV的医生以电子方式(实时)报告他们是否打算在订购测试前开抗生素,以及在UCC出院时MMBV是否有助于患者管理。记录ucc出院后7天的住院情况。结果:在实施过程中,144名医生为成人(年龄≥18岁)订购了3920例MMBV检测。研究队列中59%为女性患者,中位年龄为42岁(IQR 31-58)。为了实现主要目标,纳入了3262例病例。MMBV提示629/3262例(19.3%)可能不合理使用抗生素,其中397/629例(63.1%)医生避免处方。MMBV检出405/3262例(12.4%)可能未检出细菌感染。有283/405(69.9%)开具了抗生素处方。MMBV依从性与住院次数减少相关(7.8% vs. 30.3%)。结论:实施MMBV有助于急诊中心医生的临床决策,并可能有助于适当使用抗生素,更好地利用资源和患者管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Implementation of a rapid host-protein diagnostic test for distinguishing bacterial and viral infections in adults presenting to urgent care centers: a pragmatic cohort study.

Background: Urgent care centers (UCCs) are a growing segment of healthcare with high rates of inappropriate antibiotic use. MeMed BV® (MMBV) is a blood test that differentiates bacterial from viral infections. Between April 2022 and March 2023, we introduced MMBV into routine care at ten UCCs. The primary objective was to assess MMBV's impact on antibiotic use; the secondary objective was to assess whether MMBV aided in patient management.

Methods: A pragmatic prospective cohort study. Physicians who ordered MMBV reported electronically (in real-time) whether they intended to prescribe antibiotics before ordering the test and upon UCC discharge whether MMBV aided in patient management. Hospitalizations were recorded for 7 days post-UCC discharge.

Results: During implementation, 3920 MMBV tests were ordered for adults (age ≥ 18) by 144 physicians. The study cohort had 59% female patients and the median age was 42 years (IQR 31-58). For the primary objective, 3262 cases were included. MMBV indicated 629/3262 (19.3%) cases of potentially unwarranted antibiotics, of which physicians avoided prescriptions in 397/629 (63.1%). MMBV indicated 405/3262 (12.4%) cases of potentially missed bacterial infections. Physicians prescribed antibiotics to 283/405 (69.9%). MMBV adherence was associated with fewer hospitalizations (7.8% vs. 30.3%, p < 0.001). For the secondary objective, 2901 cases were included. Physicians reported MMBV aided patient management in 2494/2901 (86.0%) cases and contributed to avoiding emergency department referrals in 595/2901 (20.5%).

Conclusions: Implementing MMBV aided urgent care center physicians in their clinical decision-making and may have contributed to appropriate antibiotic use, better resource utilization, and patient management.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Medicine
BMC Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
13.10
自引率
1.10%
发文量
435
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Medicine is an open access, transparent peer-reviewed general medical journal. It is the flagship journal of the BMC series and publishes outstanding and influential research in various areas including clinical practice, translational medicine, medical and health advances, public health, global health, policy, and general topics of interest to the biomedical and sociomedical professional communities. In addition to research articles, the journal also publishes stimulating debates, reviews, unique forum articles, and concise tutorials. All articles published in BMC Medicine are included in various databases such as Biological Abstracts, BIOSIS, CAS, Citebase, Current contents, DOAJ, Embase, MEDLINE, PubMed, Science Citation Index Expanded, OAIster, SCImago, Scopus, SOCOLAR, and Zetoc.
期刊最新文献
Risk factors and treatment strategies for live birth in women with high BMI undergoing ART. Matrigel/serum-free, high-fidelity patient-derived tumor-like cell clusters as an in vitro platform for large-scale compound screening and chemoresistance prediction in oral cancer. Circulating imidazole propionate and coronary heart disease risk: interplay between histidine intake, fiber, and gut microbiome. Non-linear age dynamics of malaria infection and fine-scale environmental exposure in rural Uganda. Outcome measurement for multiple long-term conditions research across health-care settings - an overview of reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1