使用NIH工具箱的成人近视力评估。

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Frontiers in Neurology Pub Date : 2025-01-20 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fneur.2025.1533382
John-Christopher A Finley, Jerry Slotkin, Cindy J Nowinski, Katy Bedjeti, Nicholas Volpe, Sandra Weintraub, Richard Gershon
{"title":"使用NIH工具箱的成人近视力评估。","authors":"John-Christopher A Finley, Jerry Slotkin, Cindy J Nowinski, Katy Bedjeti, Nicholas Volpe, Sandra Weintraub, Richard Gershon","doi":"10.3389/fneur.2025.1533382","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The National Institutes of Health (NIH) Toolbox Near Visual Acuity Test is a novel digitized measure designed to provide an assessment of near vision in a time-and cost-effective manner. This study is the first to report the psychometric properties of the NIH Toolbox Near Visual Acuity Test in a sample of community-dwelling middle-aged and older adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ninety-eight adults (ages 40-81) completed the tablet-based near vision test and the gold standard chart-based near vision test. Performance on the tablet-and chart-based near vision tests was expressed in logarithmic units. Chart-and tablet-based administration order was counterbalanced. To assess test-retest reliability, the NIH Toolbox Near Visual Acuity Test was administered twice within the same day. Additionally, two equivalent versions of the chart-based test were randomly assigned to participants.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analyses revealed that test-retest reliability of the NIH Toolbox Near Visual Acuity Test was good (intraclass correlation = 0.87, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Concurrence between the NIH Toolbox Near Visual Acuity Test and gold standard chart-based test was also good (<i>r</i> = 0.79, <i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Findings provide support for the reliability and validity of the NIH Toolbox Near Visual Acuity Test as a near vision assessment for middle-aged to older adult populations. With further research, the integration of this test within the widely used NIH Toolbox may provide a more efficient means to understanding how near visual acuity influences neurocognitive test performance and brain function in middle-aged to older adult populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":12575,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Neurology","volume":"16 ","pages":"1533382"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11788145/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Near vision assessment for adults using the NIH Toolbox.\",\"authors\":\"John-Christopher A Finley, Jerry Slotkin, Cindy J Nowinski, Katy Bedjeti, Nicholas Volpe, Sandra Weintraub, Richard Gershon\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fneur.2025.1533382\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The National Institutes of Health (NIH) Toolbox Near Visual Acuity Test is a novel digitized measure designed to provide an assessment of near vision in a time-and cost-effective manner. This study is the first to report the psychometric properties of the NIH Toolbox Near Visual Acuity Test in a sample of community-dwelling middle-aged and older adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ninety-eight adults (ages 40-81) completed the tablet-based near vision test and the gold standard chart-based near vision test. Performance on the tablet-and chart-based near vision tests was expressed in logarithmic units. Chart-and tablet-based administration order was counterbalanced. To assess test-retest reliability, the NIH Toolbox Near Visual Acuity Test was administered twice within the same day. Additionally, two equivalent versions of the chart-based test were randomly assigned to participants.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analyses revealed that test-retest reliability of the NIH Toolbox Near Visual Acuity Test was good (intraclass correlation = 0.87, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Concurrence between the NIH Toolbox Near Visual Acuity Test and gold standard chart-based test was also good (<i>r</i> = 0.79, <i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Findings provide support for the reliability and validity of the NIH Toolbox Near Visual Acuity Test as a near vision assessment for middle-aged to older adult populations. With further research, the integration of this test within the widely used NIH Toolbox may provide a more efficient means to understanding how near visual acuity influences neurocognitive test performance and brain function in middle-aged to older adult populations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12575,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Neurology\",\"volume\":\"16 \",\"pages\":\"1533382\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11788145/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2025.1533382\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2025.1533382","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)工具箱近视力测试是一种新颖的数字化测量,旨在以时间和成本效益的方式提供近视力评估。本研究首次报道了美国国立卫生研究院工具箱近视力测试在社区居住的中老年人样本中的心理测量特性。方法:98例成人(40 ~ 81岁)分别完成了基于片剂的近视力测试和基于金标准图的近视力测试。在基于片剂和图表的近视力测试中的表现以对数单位表示。基于图表和平板电脑的管理秩序得到了平衡。为了评估重测信度,NIH工具箱近视力测试在同一天内进行两次。此外,两种相同版本的基于图表的测试被随机分配给参与者。结果:分析显示,NIH工具箱近视力测试的重测信度良好(类内相关 = 0.87,p r = 0.79,p )。讨论:研究结果为NIH工具箱近视力测试作为中老年人群近视力评估的信度和效度提供支持。随着进一步的研究,将该测试整合到广泛使用的NIH工具箱中,可能会提供一种更有效的方法来了解近视敏锐度如何影响中老年成年人的神经认知测试表现和大脑功能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Near vision assessment for adults using the NIH Toolbox.

Introduction: The National Institutes of Health (NIH) Toolbox Near Visual Acuity Test is a novel digitized measure designed to provide an assessment of near vision in a time-and cost-effective manner. This study is the first to report the psychometric properties of the NIH Toolbox Near Visual Acuity Test in a sample of community-dwelling middle-aged and older adults.

Methods: Ninety-eight adults (ages 40-81) completed the tablet-based near vision test and the gold standard chart-based near vision test. Performance on the tablet-and chart-based near vision tests was expressed in logarithmic units. Chart-and tablet-based administration order was counterbalanced. To assess test-retest reliability, the NIH Toolbox Near Visual Acuity Test was administered twice within the same day. Additionally, two equivalent versions of the chart-based test were randomly assigned to participants.

Results: Analyses revealed that test-retest reliability of the NIH Toolbox Near Visual Acuity Test was good (intraclass correlation = 0.87, p < 0.001). Concurrence between the NIH Toolbox Near Visual Acuity Test and gold standard chart-based test was also good (r = 0.79, p < 0.001).

Discussion: Findings provide support for the reliability and validity of the NIH Toolbox Near Visual Acuity Test as a near vision assessment for middle-aged to older adult populations. With further research, the integration of this test within the widely used NIH Toolbox may provide a more efficient means to understanding how near visual acuity influences neurocognitive test performance and brain function in middle-aged to older adult populations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Neurology
Frontiers in Neurology CLINICAL NEUROLOGYNEUROSCIENCES -NEUROSCIENCES
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
8.80%
发文量
2792
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: The section Stroke aims to quickly and accurately publish important experimental, translational and clinical studies, and reviews that contribute to the knowledge of stroke, its causes, manifestations, diagnosis, and management.
期刊最新文献
REM sleep proportion: an independent predictor of olfactory dysfunction in obstructive sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome. Atherogenic index of plasma and severe headaches or migraines risk in US adults: a population-based cross-sectional analysis from NHANES 1999-2004. A network meta-analysis of the performance of acupoint stimulation therapy in improving fatigue, neurological function, and activities of daily living in patients with multiple sclerosis. Clinical characteristics and outcomes of anti-NMDA receptor-dominant autoimmune encephalitis. A homozygous missense variant, p.Ser166Leu in the PRPF40B gene, in a 7.7 Mb region of homozygosity in a consanguineous Turkish family with essential tremor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1