化学位移和弛豫正则化提高了1H MR光谱分析的精度。

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Magnetic Resonance in Medicine Pub Date : 2025-02-04 DOI:10.1002/mrm.30462
Martin Wilson
{"title":"化学位移和弛豫正则化提高了1H MR光谱分析的精度。","authors":"Martin Wilson","doi":"10.1002/mrm.30462","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>Accurate analysis of metabolite levels from <sup>1</sup>H MRS data is a significant challenge, typically requiring the estimation of approximately 100 parameters from a single spectrum. Signal overlap, spectral noise, and common artifacts further complicate the analysis, leading to instability and reports of poor agreement between different analysis approaches. One inconsistently used method to improve analysis stability is known as regularization, where poorly determined parameters are partially constrained to take a predefined value. In this study, we examine how regularization of frequency and linewidth parameters influences analysis accuracy.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The accuracy of three MRS analysis methods was compared: (1) ABfit, (2) ABfit-reg, and (3) LCModel, where ABfit-reg is a modified version of ABfit incorporating regularization. Accuracy was assessed on synthetic MRS data generated with random variability in the frequency shift and linewidth parameters applied to each basis signal. Spectra (<span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>N</mi>\n <mo>=</mo>\n <mn>1000</mn>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$$ N=1000 $$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>) were generated across a range of SNR values (10, 30, 60, 100) to evaluate the impact of variable data quality.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Comparison between ABfit and ABfit-reg demonstrates a statistically significant (<i>p</i> &lt;  0.0005) improvement in accuracy associated with regularization for each SNR regime. An approximately 10% reduction in the mean squared metabolite errors was found for ABfit-reg compared to LCModel for SNR &gt;10 (<i>p</i> &lt;  0.0005). Furthermore, Bland-Altman analysis shows that incorporating regularization into ABfit enhances its agreement with LCModel.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Regularization is beneficial for MRS fitting and accurate characterization of the frequency and linewidth variability in vivo may yield further improvements.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":18065,"journal":{"name":"Magnetic Resonance in Medicine","volume":"93 6","pages":"2287-2296"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/mrm.30462","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Chemical shift and relaxation regularization improve the accuracy of 1H MR spectroscopy analysis\",\"authors\":\"Martin Wilson\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/mrm.30462\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Purpose</h3>\\n \\n <p>Accurate analysis of metabolite levels from <sup>1</sup>H MRS data is a significant challenge, typically requiring the estimation of approximately 100 parameters from a single spectrum. Signal overlap, spectral noise, and common artifacts further complicate the analysis, leading to instability and reports of poor agreement between different analysis approaches. One inconsistently used method to improve analysis stability is known as regularization, where poorly determined parameters are partially constrained to take a predefined value. In this study, we examine how regularization of frequency and linewidth parameters influences analysis accuracy.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>The accuracy of three MRS analysis methods was compared: (1) ABfit, (2) ABfit-reg, and (3) LCModel, where ABfit-reg is a modified version of ABfit incorporating regularization. Accuracy was assessed on synthetic MRS data generated with random variability in the frequency shift and linewidth parameters applied to each basis signal. Spectra (<span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <mi>N</mi>\\n <mo>=</mo>\\n <mn>1000</mn>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation>$$ N=1000 $$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math>) were generated across a range of SNR values (10, 30, 60, 100) to evaluate the impact of variable data quality.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Comparison between ABfit and ABfit-reg demonstrates a statistically significant (<i>p</i> &lt;  0.0005) improvement in accuracy associated with regularization for each SNR regime. An approximately 10% reduction in the mean squared metabolite errors was found for ABfit-reg compared to LCModel for SNR &gt;10 (<i>p</i> &lt;  0.0005). Furthermore, Bland-Altman analysis shows that incorporating regularization into ABfit enhances its agreement with LCModel.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Regularization is beneficial for MRS fitting and accurate characterization of the frequency and linewidth variability in vivo may yield further improvements.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18065,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Magnetic Resonance in Medicine\",\"volume\":\"93 6\",\"pages\":\"2287-2296\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/mrm.30462\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Magnetic Resonance in Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mrm.30462\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Magnetic Resonance in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mrm.30462","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:从1H MRS数据中准确分析代谢物水平是一个重大挑战,通常需要从单个光谱中估计大约100个参数。信号重叠、频谱噪声和常见的伪影进一步使分析复杂化,导致不稳定性和不同分析方法之间一致性差的报告。一种不常用的提高分析稳定性的方法被称为正则化,其中不确定的参数被部分地约束为采用预定义的值。在本研究中,我们研究了频率和线宽参数的正则化如何影响分析精度。方法:比较3种MRS分析方法的准确性:(1)ABfit、(2)ABfit-reg和(3)LCModel,其中ABfit-reg是ABfit的改进版本,加入了正则化。对应用于每个基信号的频移和线宽参数随机变化产生的合成MRS数据进行准确性评估。在信噪比范围(10,30,60,100)内生成光谱(N = 1000 $$ N=1000 $$),以评估可变数据质量的影响。结果:ABfit和ABfit-reg之间的比较具有统计学意义(p 10 (p))。结论:正则化有利于MRS拟合,准确表征体内频率和线宽变异性可能会进一步改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Chemical shift and relaxation regularization improve the accuracy of 1H MR spectroscopy analysis

Purpose

Accurate analysis of metabolite levels from 1H MRS data is a significant challenge, typically requiring the estimation of approximately 100 parameters from a single spectrum. Signal overlap, spectral noise, and common artifacts further complicate the analysis, leading to instability and reports of poor agreement between different analysis approaches. One inconsistently used method to improve analysis stability is known as regularization, where poorly determined parameters are partially constrained to take a predefined value. In this study, we examine how regularization of frequency and linewidth parameters influences analysis accuracy.

Methods

The accuracy of three MRS analysis methods was compared: (1) ABfit, (2) ABfit-reg, and (3) LCModel, where ABfit-reg is a modified version of ABfit incorporating regularization. Accuracy was assessed on synthetic MRS data generated with random variability in the frequency shift and linewidth parameters applied to each basis signal. Spectra ( N = 1000 $$ N=1000 $$ ) were generated across a range of SNR values (10, 30, 60, 100) to evaluate the impact of variable data quality.

Results

Comparison between ABfit and ABfit-reg demonstrates a statistically significant (p <  0.0005) improvement in accuracy associated with regularization for each SNR regime. An approximately 10% reduction in the mean squared metabolite errors was found for ABfit-reg compared to LCModel for SNR >10 (p <  0.0005). Furthermore, Bland-Altman analysis shows that incorporating regularization into ABfit enhances its agreement with LCModel.

Conclusion

Regularization is beneficial for MRS fitting and accurate characterization of the frequency and linewidth variability in vivo may yield further improvements.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
24.20%
发文量
376
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Magnetic Resonance in Medicine (Magn Reson Med) is an international journal devoted to the publication of original investigations concerned with all aspects of the development and use of nuclear magnetic resonance and electron paramagnetic resonance techniques for medical applications. Reports of original investigations in the areas of mathematics, computing, engineering, physics, biophysics, chemistry, biochemistry, and physiology directly relevant to magnetic resonance will be accepted, as well as methodology-oriented clinical studies.
期刊最新文献
A Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting Approach for Simultaneous T 1 - and PRFS-Based 3D MR-Thermometry. 5D Flow MRI Reveals Respiration-Driven Changes in Blood Flow Energetics in Congenital Heart Disease. DeepRelaxo: Fast Mono-Exponential Magnitude Brain R2* Mapping With Reduced Echoes Using Self-Supervised Deep Learning. Time-Conditioned Zero-Shot Self-Supervised Reconstruction for Accelerated 3D Ultra-Low-Field MRI. Reconstruction of Under-Sampled Images and Concurrent Optimization of Sampling Masks for 3D Carotid Simultaneous Non-Contrast Angiography and intraPlaque Hemorrhage MRI With Model Based Deep Learning Architecture (deepSNAP).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1