开发和验证一种新的通用的患者报告的结果测量-成人术后恢复量表(PRSA):一项前瞻性观察研究。

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Patient preference and adherence Pub Date : 2025-01-30 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/PPA.S485263
Yijun Liu, Rou Yu, Yifan Fu, Yunxia Zuo, Yanhua Qiu, Jin Liu
{"title":"开发和验证一种新的通用的患者报告的结果测量-成人术后恢复量表(PRSA):一项前瞻性观察研究。","authors":"Yijun Liu, Rou Yu, Yifan Fu, Yunxia Zuo, Yanhua Qiu, Jin Liu","doi":"10.2147/PPA.S485263","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Quality of postoperative recovery is an important perioperative patient-reported outcome. However, there are limitations in the development process and content of existing scales.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To develop and validate a universal patient-reported outcome measure, the postoperative recovery scale for adult (PRSA), to assess early and long-term postoperative recovery.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>The PRSA was developed through a new conceptual framework, systematic literature review, patient interview, and Delphi consultation. Then, the PRSA and the 15-item quality of recovery scale (QoR-15) were employed to evaluate the measurement properties of PRSA in 180 adult patients undergoing abdominal surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A 10-item PRSA scale was developed through a systematic review of 1602 literature, interviews with 138 patients, and two rounds of Delphi consultation. The correlation coefficient between the PRSA and QoR-15 ranged from 0.780 to 0.904 (<i>P</i> < 0.001), and the PRSA indicated great validity in distinguishing patients with complications. The internal consistency and test-retest reliability of the PRSA were satisfactory. Besides, the time to complete the PRSA was 27.5s (95% CI: 24.5-30.0 s) shorter than QoR-15, and more patients thought that completing the PRSA was easy compared to QoR-15 (65.7% vs 57.2%, <i>P</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The PRSA scale is a universal patient-reported outcome measure that can be utilized for evaluating postoperative recovery. It shows great measurement properties in patients undergoing abdominal surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":19972,"journal":{"name":"Patient preference and adherence","volume":"19 ","pages":"243-253"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11789672/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Developing and Validating a Novel Generic Patient-Reported Outcome Measure - Postoperative Recovery Scale for Adult (PRSA): A Prospective Observational Study.\",\"authors\":\"Yijun Liu, Rou Yu, Yifan Fu, Yunxia Zuo, Yanhua Qiu, Jin Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/PPA.S485263\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Quality of postoperative recovery is an important perioperative patient-reported outcome. However, there are limitations in the development process and content of existing scales.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To develop and validate a universal patient-reported outcome measure, the postoperative recovery scale for adult (PRSA), to assess early and long-term postoperative recovery.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>The PRSA was developed through a new conceptual framework, systematic literature review, patient interview, and Delphi consultation. Then, the PRSA and the 15-item quality of recovery scale (QoR-15) were employed to evaluate the measurement properties of PRSA in 180 adult patients undergoing abdominal surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A 10-item PRSA scale was developed through a systematic review of 1602 literature, interviews with 138 patients, and two rounds of Delphi consultation. The correlation coefficient between the PRSA and QoR-15 ranged from 0.780 to 0.904 (<i>P</i> < 0.001), and the PRSA indicated great validity in distinguishing patients with complications. The internal consistency and test-retest reliability of the PRSA were satisfactory. Besides, the time to complete the PRSA was 27.5s (95% CI: 24.5-30.0 s) shorter than QoR-15, and more patients thought that completing the PRSA was easy compared to QoR-15 (65.7% vs 57.2%, <i>P</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The PRSA scale is a universal patient-reported outcome measure that can be utilized for evaluating postoperative recovery. It shows great measurement properties in patients undergoing abdominal surgery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19972,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Patient preference and adherence\",\"volume\":\"19 \",\"pages\":\"243-253\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11789672/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Patient preference and adherence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S485263\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Patient preference and adherence","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S485263","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:术后恢复质量是围手术期患者报告的重要结果。但是,现有的量表在开发过程和内容上都存在一定的局限性。目的:开发和验证一种通用的患者报告的结果测量,成人术后恢复量表(PRSA),以评估早期和长期术后恢复。患者和方法:PRSA是通过一个新的概念框架、系统的文献回顾、患者访谈和德尔菲咨询而发展起来的。然后,采用PRSA和15项恢复质量量表(QoR-15)对180例腹部手术成人患者的PRSA测量特性进行评价。结果:通过对1602篇文献的系统回顾,对138名患者的访谈,以及两轮德尔菲咨询,制定了10项PRSA量表。PRSA与QoR-15的相关系数在0.780 ~ 0.904之间(P < 0.001), PRSA在鉴别并发症患者方面具有较高的有效性。PRSA的内部一致性和重测信度令人满意。此外,完成PRSA的时间比QoR-15短27.5s (95% CI: 24.5-30.0 s),更多的患者认为完成PRSA比QoR-15容易(65.7% vs 57.2%, P < 0.001)。结论:PRSA量表是一种通用的患者报告的结局指标,可用于评估术后恢复。它在腹部手术患者中显示出良好的测量特性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Developing and Validating a Novel Generic Patient-Reported Outcome Measure - Postoperative Recovery Scale for Adult (PRSA): A Prospective Observational Study.

Background: Quality of postoperative recovery is an important perioperative patient-reported outcome. However, there are limitations in the development process and content of existing scales.

Purpose: To develop and validate a universal patient-reported outcome measure, the postoperative recovery scale for adult (PRSA), to assess early and long-term postoperative recovery.

Patients and methods: The PRSA was developed through a new conceptual framework, systematic literature review, patient interview, and Delphi consultation. Then, the PRSA and the 15-item quality of recovery scale (QoR-15) were employed to evaluate the measurement properties of PRSA in 180 adult patients undergoing abdominal surgery.

Results: A 10-item PRSA scale was developed through a systematic review of 1602 literature, interviews with 138 patients, and two rounds of Delphi consultation. The correlation coefficient between the PRSA and QoR-15 ranged from 0.780 to 0.904 (P < 0.001), and the PRSA indicated great validity in distinguishing patients with complications. The internal consistency and test-retest reliability of the PRSA were satisfactory. Besides, the time to complete the PRSA was 27.5s (95% CI: 24.5-30.0 s) shorter than QoR-15, and more patients thought that completing the PRSA was easy compared to QoR-15 (65.7% vs 57.2%, P < 0.001).

Conclusion: The PRSA scale is a universal patient-reported outcome measure that can be utilized for evaluating postoperative recovery. It shows great measurement properties in patients undergoing abdominal surgery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Patient preference and adherence
Patient preference and adherence MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
4.50%
发文量
354
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Patient Preference and Adherence is an international, peer reviewed, open access journal that focuses on the growing importance of patient preference and adherence throughout the therapeutic continuum. The journal is characterized by the rapid reporting of reviews, original research, modeling and clinical studies across all therapeutic areas. Patient satisfaction, acceptability, quality of life, compliance, persistence and their role in developing new therapeutic modalities and compounds to optimize clinical outcomes for existing disease states are major areas of interest for the journal. As of 1st April 2019, Patient Preference and Adherence will no longer consider meta-analyses for publication.
期刊最新文献
Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice Toward Long-Term Anticoagulation in Patients with Venous Thromboembolism: A Cross-Sectional Study. Navigating Adversity: Psychosocial Transformation, Service Advocacy, and End-of-Life Perceptions Among Family Caregivers of PLWHA During Inpatient Treatment in Hunan, China. Extended Consultations as a Trial Intervention in General Practice: Experiences of Patients with Complex Multimorbidities. Family Function and Self-Management in Glaucoma Patients: Chain Mediation of Psychological Capital and Coping Style. Barriers to Adherence to Remote Pelvic Floor Muscle Training Among Postpartum Women: A Qualitative Study Guided by the COM-B Model.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1