OpenOFM:多段牛津足模型的开源实现。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering Pub Date : 2026-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-04 DOI:10.1080/10255842.2024.2448558
Philippe C Dixon, Elodie E Drew, Sean P McBride, Marian Harrington, Julie Stebbins, Amy B Zavatsky
{"title":"OpenOFM:多段牛津足模型的开源实现。","authors":"Philippe C Dixon, Elodie E Drew, Sean P McBride, Marian Harrington, Julie Stebbins, Amy B Zavatsky","doi":"10.1080/10255842.2024.2448558","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Oxford Foot Model (OFM) is a widely-used multi-segment foot model for the evaluation of foot motion. To date, custom code based on the original scientific publications have failed to reproduce results available through the Vicon plug-in (ViconOFM). This highlights a lack of transparency, affecting the accessibility and understanding of the model. Therefore, the aims of this study are to (1) replicate ViconOFM using Python for open-source distribution (openOFM v1.0) and (2) reproduce the original scientific description of the OFM in a second version (openOFM v1.1), highlighting differences between both versions. A dataset comprising one healthy adult and a set of five patients with heterogeneous foot pathologies was used for analyses. Evaluation was conducted using the normalised root mean square error (NRMSE) between the inter-segment angles and arch heights of both implementations. The openOFM v1.1 was developed based on the original OFM publications. The average NRMSE between ViconOFM and openOFM v1.0, using both healthy and pathological gait, was of 0.0012. Based on our openOFM v1.1 implementation, differences between ViconOFM and the original OFM description from the literature are due to an integrated smoothing and gap filling function and changes in segment definitions. The negligible differences between ViconOFM and openOFM v1.0 in healthy and pathological gait supports the concurrent validity of openOFM. Providing users with both openOFM versions enables informed use of either model and allows further investigation into the implications of these differences. The open-source nature of the project promotes further development.</p>","PeriodicalId":50640,"journal":{"name":"Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering","volume":" ","pages":"1478-1491"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"OpenOFM: an open-source implementation of the multi-segment Oxford Foot Model.\",\"authors\":\"Philippe C Dixon, Elodie E Drew, Sean P McBride, Marian Harrington, Julie Stebbins, Amy B Zavatsky\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10255842.2024.2448558\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The Oxford Foot Model (OFM) is a widely-used multi-segment foot model for the evaluation of foot motion. To date, custom code based on the original scientific publications have failed to reproduce results available through the Vicon plug-in (ViconOFM). This highlights a lack of transparency, affecting the accessibility and understanding of the model. Therefore, the aims of this study are to (1) replicate ViconOFM using Python for open-source distribution (openOFM v1.0) and (2) reproduce the original scientific description of the OFM in a second version (openOFM v1.1), highlighting differences between both versions. A dataset comprising one healthy adult and a set of five patients with heterogeneous foot pathologies was used for analyses. Evaluation was conducted using the normalised root mean square error (NRMSE) between the inter-segment angles and arch heights of both implementations. The openOFM v1.1 was developed based on the original OFM publications. The average NRMSE between ViconOFM and openOFM v1.0, using both healthy and pathological gait, was of 0.0012. Based on our openOFM v1.1 implementation, differences between ViconOFM and the original OFM description from the literature are due to an integrated smoothing and gap filling function and changes in segment definitions. The negligible differences between ViconOFM and openOFM v1.0 in healthy and pathological gait supports the concurrent validity of openOFM. Providing users with both openOFM versions enables informed use of either model and allows further investigation into the implications of these differences. The open-source nature of the project promotes further development.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50640,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1478-1491\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10255842.2024.2448558\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10255842.2024.2448558","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

牛津足模型(Oxford Foot Model, OFM)是一种广泛应用于足部运动评价的多段足部模型。迄今为止,基于原始科学出版物的自定义代码无法通过Vicon插件(ViconOFM)重现可用的结果。这突出了透明度的缺乏,影响了模型的可访问性和理解。因此,本研究的目的是:(1)使用Python进行开源发行(openOFM v1.0)复制ViconOFM,(2)在第二个版本(openOFM v1.1)中复制对OFM的原始科学描述,突出两个版本之间的差异。数据集包括一名健康成人和五名患有异质性足部病变的患者,用于分析。使用两种实现的段间角度和拱高之间的归一化均方根误差(NRMSE)进行评估。openOFM v1.1是在原始OFM出版物的基础上开发的。使用健康和病理步态时,ViconOFM和openOFM v1.0的平均NRMSE为0.0012。基于我们的openOFM v1.1实现,ViconOFM与文献中原始OFM描述之间的差异是由于集成了平滑和间隙填充功能以及段定义的变化。ViconOFM和openOFM v1.0在健康和病理步态上的差异可以忽略不计,这支持了openOFM的并发有效性。向用户提供两个openOFM版本,可以明智地使用任何一个模型,并允许进一步研究这些差异的含义。项目的开源特性促进了进一步的开发。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
OpenOFM: an open-source implementation of the multi-segment Oxford Foot Model.

The Oxford Foot Model (OFM) is a widely-used multi-segment foot model for the evaluation of foot motion. To date, custom code based on the original scientific publications have failed to reproduce results available through the Vicon plug-in (ViconOFM). This highlights a lack of transparency, affecting the accessibility and understanding of the model. Therefore, the aims of this study are to (1) replicate ViconOFM using Python for open-source distribution (openOFM v1.0) and (2) reproduce the original scientific description of the OFM in a second version (openOFM v1.1), highlighting differences between both versions. A dataset comprising one healthy adult and a set of five patients with heterogeneous foot pathologies was used for analyses. Evaluation was conducted using the normalised root mean square error (NRMSE) between the inter-segment angles and arch heights of both implementations. The openOFM v1.1 was developed based on the original OFM publications. The average NRMSE between ViconOFM and openOFM v1.0, using both healthy and pathological gait, was of 0.0012. Based on our openOFM v1.1 implementation, differences between ViconOFM and the original OFM description from the literature are due to an integrated smoothing and gap filling function and changes in segment definitions. The negligible differences between ViconOFM and openOFM v1.0 in healthy and pathological gait supports the concurrent validity of openOFM. Providing users with both openOFM versions enables informed use of either model and allows further investigation into the implications of these differences. The open-source nature of the project promotes further development.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
179
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The primary aims of Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering are to provide a means of communicating the advances being made in the areas of biomechanics and biomedical engineering and to stimulate interest in the continually emerging computer based technologies which are being applied in these multidisciplinary subjects. Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering will also provide a focus for the importance of integrating the disciplines of engineering with medical technology and clinical expertise. Such integration will have a major impact on health care in the future.
期刊最新文献
Three-level early-stage of maternal health risk using clinical data. A fast prediction method for pre-puncture brain deformation based on a mass-spring-damper and potential field model. Piezoelectric vibration energy harvesting to power a wearable nerve stimulator for tremor suppression. Design and optimization of intelligent teaching aid system for badminton: research on sports interaction experience. Potential role of palmitoylation-coexpressed lncRNA in prognosis and immunotherapy of hepatocellular carcinoma.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1