在生命周期评价中加入环境影响和产品质量:以乳酸菌浓缩液的生产和储存为例

IF 4.9 Q2 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL Cleaner Environmental Systems Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-10 DOI:10.1016/j.cesys.2024.100245
Maite Gagneten , Camille Quentier , Stéphanie Passot , Stéphanie Cenard , Fernanda Fonseca , Caroline Pénicaud
{"title":"在生命周期评价中加入环境影响和产品质量:以乳酸菌浓缩液的生产和储存为例","authors":"Maite Gagneten ,&nbsp;Camille Quentier ,&nbsp;Stéphanie Passot ,&nbsp;Stéphanie Cenard ,&nbsp;Fernanda Fonseca ,&nbsp;Caroline Pénicaud","doi":"10.1016/j.cesys.2024.100245","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Lactic acid bacteria are widely used in the food and pharmaceutical industries to produce fermented foods and probiotics. This study assesses the environmental impacts of fifteen production and storage strategies for lactic acid bacteria concentrates from two strains. A life cycle assessment was performed using pilot-scale data. Environmental impacts per functional unit were weighted based on biological activity using two approaches: one by final biological activity after storage and the other by activity at each production stage. Fermentation emerged as a key phase in both methods, with higher yields significantly reducing environmental impacts. Stabilization and storage also contributed substantially to both environmental impact and loss of biological activity. The choice of stabilization method and storage conditions depends on the strain and expected storage duration. The weighting method affected the results: weighting by final biological quality highlighted the preservation of activity while weighting by each production stage better reflected the material and energy flows responsible for environmental damage. This study identifies crucial stages for improving the sustainability of lactic acid bacteria production and suggests that integrating environmental and quality factors is essential when designing production processes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34616,"journal":{"name":"Cleaner Environmental Systems","volume":"15 ","pages":"Article 100245"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Joining environmental impacts and product quality in Life Cycle Assessment: The case of the production and storage of lactic acid bacteria concentrates\",\"authors\":\"Maite Gagneten ,&nbsp;Camille Quentier ,&nbsp;Stéphanie Passot ,&nbsp;Stéphanie Cenard ,&nbsp;Fernanda Fonseca ,&nbsp;Caroline Pénicaud\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cesys.2024.100245\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Lactic acid bacteria are widely used in the food and pharmaceutical industries to produce fermented foods and probiotics. This study assesses the environmental impacts of fifteen production and storage strategies for lactic acid bacteria concentrates from two strains. A life cycle assessment was performed using pilot-scale data. Environmental impacts per functional unit were weighted based on biological activity using two approaches: one by final biological activity after storage and the other by activity at each production stage. Fermentation emerged as a key phase in both methods, with higher yields significantly reducing environmental impacts. Stabilization and storage also contributed substantially to both environmental impact and loss of biological activity. The choice of stabilization method and storage conditions depends on the strain and expected storage duration. The weighting method affected the results: weighting by final biological quality highlighted the preservation of activity while weighting by each production stage better reflected the material and energy flows responsible for environmental damage. This study identifies crucial stages for improving the sustainability of lactic acid bacteria production and suggests that integrating environmental and quality factors is essential when designing production processes.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34616,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cleaner Environmental Systems\",\"volume\":\"15 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100245\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cleaner Environmental Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666789424000837\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleaner Environmental Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666789424000837","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

乳酸菌广泛应用于食品和制药行业,生产发酵食品和益生菌。本研究评估了两株乳酸菌浓缩液的15种生产和储存策略对环境的影响。使用中试规模数据进行生命周期评估。采用两种方法对每个功能单元的环境影响进行加权:一种是储存后的最终生物活性,另一种是每个生产阶段的活性。发酵成为两种方法的关键阶段,产量较高,显著减少了对环境的影响。稳定和储存也在很大程度上造成了环境影响和生物活性的丧失。稳定方法和储存条件的选择取决于应变和预期的储存时间。加权方法影响结果:最终生物质量加权突出了活性的保存,而每个生产阶段的加权更能反映对环境破坏负责的物质和能量流动。本研究确定了提高乳酸菌生产可持续性的关键阶段,并建议在设计生产工艺时整合环境和质量因素是必不可少的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Joining environmental impacts and product quality in Life Cycle Assessment: The case of the production and storage of lactic acid bacteria concentrates
Lactic acid bacteria are widely used in the food and pharmaceutical industries to produce fermented foods and probiotics. This study assesses the environmental impacts of fifteen production and storage strategies for lactic acid bacteria concentrates from two strains. A life cycle assessment was performed using pilot-scale data. Environmental impacts per functional unit were weighted based on biological activity using two approaches: one by final biological activity after storage and the other by activity at each production stage. Fermentation emerged as a key phase in both methods, with higher yields significantly reducing environmental impacts. Stabilization and storage also contributed substantially to both environmental impact and loss of biological activity. The choice of stabilization method and storage conditions depends on the strain and expected storage duration. The weighting method affected the results: weighting by final biological quality highlighted the preservation of activity while weighting by each production stage better reflected the material and energy flows responsible for environmental damage. This study identifies crucial stages for improving the sustainability of lactic acid bacteria production and suggests that integrating environmental and quality factors is essential when designing production processes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cleaner Environmental Systems
Cleaner Environmental Systems Environmental Science-Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
审稿时长
52 days
期刊最新文献
Sustainable electronics in health technology - Using environmental life cycle assessments for circular business models Beyond case studies: A city-level quantitative analysis of payments for ecosystem services system and atmospheric environmental quality Sufficiency-based absolute sustainability position assessment for passenger vehicles Assessment of the carbon footprint of an Italian football team during a sport year A stakeholder-centered repairability index supporting circular product design
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1