基于生命周期评价的沼气能源成本效益分析及碳足迹

IF 4.9 Q2 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL Cleaner Environmental Systems Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-26 DOI:10.1016/j.cesys.2024.100240
Tsai-Chi Kuo , Hsiang-Yue Chen , Billy Chong , Meichun Lin
{"title":"基于生命周期评价的沼气能源成本效益分析及碳足迹","authors":"Tsai-Chi Kuo ,&nbsp;Hsiang-Yue Chen ,&nbsp;Billy Chong ,&nbsp;Meichun Lin","doi":"10.1016/j.cesys.2024.100240","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Biogas is a kind of renewable energy resource and can be burned to produce electricity and heat. If methane is released directly into the air, it would be a very serious source of GHG emissions. Therefore, capturing and recycling methane for power generation would not only significantly reduce industrial greenhouse gas emissions, but also reduce the need to purchase electricity.</div><div>In addition, with the Net Zero in 2050 initiative and circular economy, more academic and industry research investigate the biogas energy. However, the cost and carbon footprint of biogas energy is varied with the technologies. In this research, the As-Is (biomass waste treatment) and To-Be (biomass waste to energy) model is compared. It shows it is worth to do the investment of bioenergy system for the farm to reduce the GHG emissions if the carbon tax is added. However, the cost of bioenergy facilities will influence the income. A case study is also illustrated to provide the biogas energy production for the government policy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34616,"journal":{"name":"Cleaner Environmental Systems","volume":"15 ","pages":"Article 100240"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cost benefit analysis and carbon footprint of biogas energy through life cycle assessment\",\"authors\":\"Tsai-Chi Kuo ,&nbsp;Hsiang-Yue Chen ,&nbsp;Billy Chong ,&nbsp;Meichun Lin\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cesys.2024.100240\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Biogas is a kind of renewable energy resource and can be burned to produce electricity and heat. If methane is released directly into the air, it would be a very serious source of GHG emissions. Therefore, capturing and recycling methane for power generation would not only significantly reduce industrial greenhouse gas emissions, but also reduce the need to purchase electricity.</div><div>In addition, with the Net Zero in 2050 initiative and circular economy, more academic and industry research investigate the biogas energy. However, the cost and carbon footprint of biogas energy is varied with the technologies. In this research, the As-Is (biomass waste treatment) and To-Be (biomass waste to energy) model is compared. It shows it is worth to do the investment of bioenergy system for the farm to reduce the GHG emissions if the carbon tax is added. However, the cost of bioenergy facilities will influence the income. A case study is also illustrated to provide the biogas energy production for the government policy.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34616,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cleaner Environmental Systems\",\"volume\":\"15 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100240\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cleaner Environmental Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666789424000783\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleaner Environmental Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666789424000783","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

沼气是一种可再生能源,可以通过燃烧产生电能和热能。如果甲烷被直接释放到空气中,它将成为一个非常严重的温室气体排放源。因此,捕获和回收甲烷用于发电不仅可以显著减少工业温室气体排放,还可以减少购买电力的需求。此外,随着2050年净零排放倡议和循环经济,越来越多的学术和行业研究对沼气能源进行了调查。然而,沼气能源的成本和碳足迹随技术的不同而不同。在本研究中,比较了As-Is(生物质废物处理)和be(生物质废物转化为能源)模型。这表明,如果增加碳税,为减少温室气体排放,对农场进行生物能源系统的投资是值得的。然而,生物能源设施的成本将影响收入。并通过实例分析,为政府制定相关政策提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Cost benefit analysis and carbon footprint of biogas energy through life cycle assessment
Biogas is a kind of renewable energy resource and can be burned to produce electricity and heat. If methane is released directly into the air, it would be a very serious source of GHG emissions. Therefore, capturing and recycling methane for power generation would not only significantly reduce industrial greenhouse gas emissions, but also reduce the need to purchase electricity.
In addition, with the Net Zero in 2050 initiative and circular economy, more academic and industry research investigate the biogas energy. However, the cost and carbon footprint of biogas energy is varied with the technologies. In this research, the As-Is (biomass waste treatment) and To-Be (biomass waste to energy) model is compared. It shows it is worth to do the investment of bioenergy system for the farm to reduce the GHG emissions if the carbon tax is added. However, the cost of bioenergy facilities will influence the income. A case study is also illustrated to provide the biogas energy production for the government policy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cleaner Environmental Systems
Cleaner Environmental Systems Environmental Science-Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
审稿时长
52 days
期刊最新文献
Sustainable electronics in health technology - Using environmental life cycle assessments for circular business models Life-cycle environmental and social trade-offs in concrete road frame systems Evaluation of gaps in life cycle sustainability assessments of 3D concrete printing: A systematic literature review and recommendations Estimating facility-level greenhouse gas emissions in U.S. hospitals with machine learning imputation of incomplete self-reported data Beyond case studies: A city-level quantitative analysis of payments for ecosystem services system and atmospheric environmental quality
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1