运用设计思维培养职前教师在教案设计中的创造力,促进数学互动学习

IF 4.9 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Learning and Instruction Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-04 DOI:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.102070
Eduard M. Albay, Delia V. Eisma
{"title":"运用设计思维培养职前教师在教案设计中的创造力,促进数学互动学习","authors":"Eduard M. Albay,&nbsp;Delia V. Eisma","doi":"10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.102070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The demands of the 21st-century work environment increasingly challenge higher education educators to develop students’ ability to think creatively and critically, work collaboratively, communicate effectively, and solve problems innovatively by employing instructional methodologies that highlight interactive and active learning. Design thinking has gained widespread acceptance as a student-centered instructional approach that emphasizes the value of collaboration.</div></div><div><h3>Aims</h3><div>This study was conducted to determine the effects of design thinking on the creativity of teaching plans of pre-service teachers as an output of a performance task assessment.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The study utilized the posttest-only true experimental research design involving 25 matched pairs of pre-service teachers. The developed teaching plans of the experimental and control groups were evaluated using a rubric and compared their performances through the Welch <em>t</em>-test. A priori and post-hoc power analyses were performed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Statistical analysis showed that the experimental group outperformed the control group in the given performance task. The experimental and control groups' mean scores in all the rubric indicators recorded large differences that are statistically significant. There is also a statistically significant consensus between the evaluators’ ratings.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Conclusively, the design thinking process can positively impact the pre-service teachers' development of creative and professionally-designed teaching plans.</div></div><div><h3>Recommendation</h3><div>Further, this paper presented and discussed the implications of the results for facilitating interactive and active learning environments and the recommendations for future research undertakings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48357,"journal":{"name":"Learning and Instruction","volume":"96 ","pages":"Article 102070"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using design thinking for developing pre-service teachers’ creativity in designing teaching plans to promote interactive learning in mathematics\",\"authors\":\"Eduard M. Albay,&nbsp;Delia V. Eisma\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.102070\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The demands of the 21st-century work environment increasingly challenge higher education educators to develop students’ ability to think creatively and critically, work collaboratively, communicate effectively, and solve problems innovatively by employing instructional methodologies that highlight interactive and active learning. Design thinking has gained widespread acceptance as a student-centered instructional approach that emphasizes the value of collaboration.</div></div><div><h3>Aims</h3><div>This study was conducted to determine the effects of design thinking on the creativity of teaching plans of pre-service teachers as an output of a performance task assessment.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The study utilized the posttest-only true experimental research design involving 25 matched pairs of pre-service teachers. The developed teaching plans of the experimental and control groups were evaluated using a rubric and compared their performances through the Welch <em>t</em>-test. A priori and post-hoc power analyses were performed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Statistical analysis showed that the experimental group outperformed the control group in the given performance task. The experimental and control groups' mean scores in all the rubric indicators recorded large differences that are statistically significant. There is also a statistically significant consensus between the evaluators’ ratings.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Conclusively, the design thinking process can positively impact the pre-service teachers' development of creative and professionally-designed teaching plans.</div></div><div><h3>Recommendation</h3><div>Further, this paper presented and discussed the implications of the results for facilitating interactive and active learning environments and the recommendations for future research undertakings.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48357,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Learning and Instruction\",\"volume\":\"96 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102070\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Learning and Instruction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095947522400197X\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning and Instruction","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095947522400197X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

21世纪工作环境的要求对高等教育工作者提出了越来越大的挑战,要求他们通过采用强调互动和主动学习的教学方法,培养学生的创造性和批判性思维、协同工作、有效沟通和创新解决问题的能力。设计思维作为一种强调协作价值的以学生为中心的教学方法,已经获得了广泛的认可。目的本研究旨在确定设计思维对职前教师教学计划创造力的影响,作为绩效任务评估的输出。方法采用单纯后测的真实实验研究设计,对25对匹配的职前教师进行调查。采用评分法对实验组和对照组制定的教学计划进行评估,并通过韦尔奇t检验比较其绩效。进行了先验和事后功率分析。结果统计分析表明,实验组在给定的性能任务中表现优于对照组。实验组和对照组在所有单项指标上的平均得分均有较大差异,具有统计学意义。在评估者的评级之间也存在统计学上显著的共识。结论设计思维过程对职前教师制定创造性、专业化教案具有积极影响。此外,本文提出并讨论了研究结果对促进互动和主动学习环境的影响,以及对未来研究工作的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Using design thinking for developing pre-service teachers’ creativity in designing teaching plans to promote interactive learning in mathematics

Background

The demands of the 21st-century work environment increasingly challenge higher education educators to develop students’ ability to think creatively and critically, work collaboratively, communicate effectively, and solve problems innovatively by employing instructional methodologies that highlight interactive and active learning. Design thinking has gained widespread acceptance as a student-centered instructional approach that emphasizes the value of collaboration.

Aims

This study was conducted to determine the effects of design thinking on the creativity of teaching plans of pre-service teachers as an output of a performance task assessment.

Methods

The study utilized the posttest-only true experimental research design involving 25 matched pairs of pre-service teachers. The developed teaching plans of the experimental and control groups were evaluated using a rubric and compared their performances through the Welch t-test. A priori and post-hoc power analyses were performed.

Results

Statistical analysis showed that the experimental group outperformed the control group in the given performance task. The experimental and control groups' mean scores in all the rubric indicators recorded large differences that are statistically significant. There is also a statistically significant consensus between the evaluators’ ratings.

Conclusion

Conclusively, the design thinking process can positively impact the pre-service teachers' development of creative and professionally-designed teaching plans.

Recommendation

Further, this paper presented and discussed the implications of the results for facilitating interactive and active learning environments and the recommendations for future research undertakings.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
4.80%
发文量
109
期刊介绍: As an international, multi-disciplinary, peer-refereed journal, Learning and Instruction provides a platform for the publication of the most advanced scientific research in the areas of learning, development, instruction and teaching. The journal welcomes original empirical investigations. The papers may represent a variety of theoretical perspectives and different methodological approaches. They may refer to any age level, from infants to adults and to a diversity of learning and instructional settings, from laboratory experiments to field studies. The major criteria in the review and the selection process concern the significance of the contribution to the area of learning and instruction, and the rigor of the study.
期刊最新文献
Empowering teachers by integrating inter- and intrapersonal attributional perspectives: How teachers’ attributions and responsibility shape their emotions and classroom interventions Implementing multimodal learning analytics in authentic settings: A roadmap for ecological impact Purpose instructions and task models in multiple-text reading Weaving the tapestry of student annotations on perusall: Uncovering annotation types, syntactic patterns, and their role in learning Performance and learning differences inside and outside Immersive virtual learning (IVR): Investigating the CAMIL model for chemistry lab skill development in high school students
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1