东南亚生物识别数据格局:有效监管的挑战与机遇

IF 3.2 3区 社会学 Q1 LAW Computer Law & Security Review Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-17 DOI:10.1016/j.clsr.2024.106095
Abigail Chiu Mei Lim , Lynnette Hui Xian Ng , Araz Taeihagh
{"title":"东南亚生物识别数据格局:有效监管的挑战与机遇","authors":"Abigail Chiu Mei Lim ,&nbsp;Lynnette Hui Xian Ng ,&nbsp;Araz Taeihagh","doi":"10.1016/j.clsr.2024.106095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Technology evolves at a breakneck pace. As a result, legislatures are often unable to enact laws that can keep pace with technological changes. The dissonance between the state of the law and the state of technology intensifies with respect to biometric data because the purposes of biometric data use evolve, the types of biometric data expand, and its collection, processing and use have shifted from conventional biometric systems to online platforms. This dissonance is exemplified in the Association of Southeast Asian Nations, where no regional legal instrument regulates biometric data even though governmental agencies, private entities and social media platforms actively employ biometric data and artificial intelligence systems. At national level, only five countries, Malaysia, Singapore, Indonesia, Thailand, and the Philippines, have enacted omnibus data protection legislations that afford some protection to biometric data and govern its use. This article analyses these data protection legislations and assesses their suitability in protecting and governing biometric data in the contemporary era. It identifies common trends amongst the five countries and concludes that more needs to be done to protect biometric data and rights of data subjects. Thereafter, it makes recommendations for changes to improve the state of biometric regulation in Southeast Asia.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51516,"journal":{"name":"Computer Law & Security Review","volume":"56 ","pages":"Article 106095"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Biometric data landscape in Southeast Asia: Challenges and opportunities for effective regulation\",\"authors\":\"Abigail Chiu Mei Lim ,&nbsp;Lynnette Hui Xian Ng ,&nbsp;Araz Taeihagh\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clsr.2024.106095\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Technology evolves at a breakneck pace. As a result, legislatures are often unable to enact laws that can keep pace with technological changes. The dissonance between the state of the law and the state of technology intensifies with respect to biometric data because the purposes of biometric data use evolve, the types of biometric data expand, and its collection, processing and use have shifted from conventional biometric systems to online platforms. This dissonance is exemplified in the Association of Southeast Asian Nations, where no regional legal instrument regulates biometric data even though governmental agencies, private entities and social media platforms actively employ biometric data and artificial intelligence systems. At national level, only five countries, Malaysia, Singapore, Indonesia, Thailand, and the Philippines, have enacted omnibus data protection legislations that afford some protection to biometric data and govern its use. This article analyses these data protection legislations and assesses their suitability in protecting and governing biometric data in the contemporary era. It identifies common trends amongst the five countries and concludes that more needs to be done to protect biometric data and rights of data subjects. Thereafter, it makes recommendations for changes to improve the state of biometric regulation in Southeast Asia.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51516,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computer Law & Security Review\",\"volume\":\"56 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106095\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computer Law & Security Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0267364924001602\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computer Law & Security Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0267364924001602","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

技术以惊人的速度发展。因此,立法机构往往无法制定出能够跟上技术变革步伐的法律。在生物特征数据方面,法律状况和技术状况之间的不协调加剧,因为生物特征数据使用的目的在不断发展,生物特征数据的类型在不断扩大,其收集、处理和使用已经从传统的生物特征系统转向了在线平台。这种不协调体现在东南亚国家联盟(Association of Southeast Asian Nations),尽管政府机构、私人实体和社交媒体平台积极采用生物识别数据和人工智能系统,但没有任何区域法律文书对生物识别数据进行监管。在国家层面上,只有马来西亚、新加坡、印度尼西亚、泰国和菲律宾这五个国家制定了综合数据保护立法,为生物识别数据提供一定的保护并管理其使用。本文分析了这些数据保护立法,并评估了它们在当代保护和管理生物特征数据方面的适用性。它确定了五个国家之间的共同趋势,并得出结论,需要做更多的工作来保护生物特征数据和数据主体的权利。之后,它提出了改变的建议,以改善东南亚的生物识别监管状况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Biometric data landscape in Southeast Asia: Challenges and opportunities for effective regulation
Technology evolves at a breakneck pace. As a result, legislatures are often unable to enact laws that can keep pace with technological changes. The dissonance between the state of the law and the state of technology intensifies with respect to biometric data because the purposes of biometric data use evolve, the types of biometric data expand, and its collection, processing and use have shifted from conventional biometric systems to online platforms. This dissonance is exemplified in the Association of Southeast Asian Nations, where no regional legal instrument regulates biometric data even though governmental agencies, private entities and social media platforms actively employ biometric data and artificial intelligence systems. At national level, only five countries, Malaysia, Singapore, Indonesia, Thailand, and the Philippines, have enacted omnibus data protection legislations that afford some protection to biometric data and govern its use. This article analyses these data protection legislations and assesses their suitability in protecting and governing biometric data in the contemporary era. It identifies common trends amongst the five countries and concludes that more needs to be done to protect biometric data and rights of data subjects. Thereafter, it makes recommendations for changes to improve the state of biometric regulation in Southeast Asia.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
10.30%
发文量
81
审稿时长
67 days
期刊介绍: CLSR publishes refereed academic and practitioner papers on topics such as Web 2.0, IT security, Identity management, ID cards, RFID, interference with privacy, Internet law, telecoms regulation, online broadcasting, intellectual property, software law, e-commerce, outsourcing, data protection, EU policy, freedom of information, computer security and many other topics. In addition it provides a regular update on European Union developments, national news from more than 20 jurisdictions in both Europe and the Pacific Rim. It is looking for papers within the subject area that display good quality legal analysis and new lines of legal thought or policy development that go beyond mere description of the subject area, however accurate that may be.
期刊最新文献
Who owns my AI twin? Data ownership in a new world of simulated identities A wild data controller appeared! Opacity in personal data protection documentation of Pokémon mobile games Adjudicative AI and distributive justice Legal process mining for the analysis of public procurement workflows How transparent are social media platforms? A legal and empirical evaluation of Brazil's regulatory landscape
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1