Abigail Chiu Mei Lim , Lynnette Hui Xian Ng , Araz Taeihagh
{"title":"东南亚生物识别数据格局:有效监管的挑战与机遇","authors":"Abigail Chiu Mei Lim , Lynnette Hui Xian Ng , Araz Taeihagh","doi":"10.1016/j.clsr.2024.106095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Technology evolves at a breakneck pace. As a result, legislatures are often unable to enact laws that can keep pace with technological changes. The dissonance between the state of the law and the state of technology intensifies with respect to biometric data because the purposes of biometric data use evolve, the types of biometric data expand, and its collection, processing and use have shifted from conventional biometric systems to online platforms. This dissonance is exemplified in the Association of Southeast Asian Nations, where no regional legal instrument regulates biometric data even though governmental agencies, private entities and social media platforms actively employ biometric data and artificial intelligence systems. At national level, only five countries, Malaysia, Singapore, Indonesia, Thailand, and the Philippines, have enacted omnibus data protection legislations that afford some protection to biometric data and govern its use. This article analyses these data protection legislations and assesses their suitability in protecting and governing biometric data in the contemporary era. It identifies common trends amongst the five countries and concludes that more needs to be done to protect biometric data and rights of data subjects. Thereafter, it makes recommendations for changes to improve the state of biometric regulation in Southeast Asia.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51516,"journal":{"name":"Computer Law & Security Review","volume":"56 ","pages":"Article 106095"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Biometric data landscape in Southeast Asia: Challenges and opportunities for effective regulation\",\"authors\":\"Abigail Chiu Mei Lim , Lynnette Hui Xian Ng , Araz Taeihagh\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clsr.2024.106095\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Technology evolves at a breakneck pace. As a result, legislatures are often unable to enact laws that can keep pace with technological changes. The dissonance between the state of the law and the state of technology intensifies with respect to biometric data because the purposes of biometric data use evolve, the types of biometric data expand, and its collection, processing and use have shifted from conventional biometric systems to online platforms. This dissonance is exemplified in the Association of Southeast Asian Nations, where no regional legal instrument regulates biometric data even though governmental agencies, private entities and social media platforms actively employ biometric data and artificial intelligence systems. At national level, only five countries, Malaysia, Singapore, Indonesia, Thailand, and the Philippines, have enacted omnibus data protection legislations that afford some protection to biometric data and govern its use. This article analyses these data protection legislations and assesses their suitability in protecting and governing biometric data in the contemporary era. It identifies common trends amongst the five countries and concludes that more needs to be done to protect biometric data and rights of data subjects. Thereafter, it makes recommendations for changes to improve the state of biometric regulation in Southeast Asia.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51516,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computer Law & Security Review\",\"volume\":\"56 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106095\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computer Law & Security Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0267364924001602\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computer Law & Security Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0267364924001602","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
技术以惊人的速度发展。因此,立法机构往往无法制定出能够跟上技术变革步伐的法律。在生物特征数据方面,法律状况和技术状况之间的不协调加剧,因为生物特征数据使用的目的在不断发展,生物特征数据的类型在不断扩大,其收集、处理和使用已经从传统的生物特征系统转向了在线平台。这种不协调体现在东南亚国家联盟(Association of Southeast Asian Nations),尽管政府机构、私人实体和社交媒体平台积极采用生物识别数据和人工智能系统,但没有任何区域法律文书对生物识别数据进行监管。在国家层面上,只有马来西亚、新加坡、印度尼西亚、泰国和菲律宾这五个国家制定了综合数据保护立法,为生物识别数据提供一定的保护并管理其使用。本文分析了这些数据保护立法,并评估了它们在当代保护和管理生物特征数据方面的适用性。它确定了五个国家之间的共同趋势,并得出结论,需要做更多的工作来保护生物特征数据和数据主体的权利。之后,它提出了改变的建议,以改善东南亚的生物识别监管状况。
Biometric data landscape in Southeast Asia: Challenges and opportunities for effective regulation
Technology evolves at a breakneck pace. As a result, legislatures are often unable to enact laws that can keep pace with technological changes. The dissonance between the state of the law and the state of technology intensifies with respect to biometric data because the purposes of biometric data use evolve, the types of biometric data expand, and its collection, processing and use have shifted from conventional biometric systems to online platforms. This dissonance is exemplified in the Association of Southeast Asian Nations, where no regional legal instrument regulates biometric data even though governmental agencies, private entities and social media platforms actively employ biometric data and artificial intelligence systems. At national level, only five countries, Malaysia, Singapore, Indonesia, Thailand, and the Philippines, have enacted omnibus data protection legislations that afford some protection to biometric data and govern its use. This article analyses these data protection legislations and assesses their suitability in protecting and governing biometric data in the contemporary era. It identifies common trends amongst the five countries and concludes that more needs to be done to protect biometric data and rights of data subjects. Thereafter, it makes recommendations for changes to improve the state of biometric regulation in Southeast Asia.
期刊介绍:
CLSR publishes refereed academic and practitioner papers on topics such as Web 2.0, IT security, Identity management, ID cards, RFID, interference with privacy, Internet law, telecoms regulation, online broadcasting, intellectual property, software law, e-commerce, outsourcing, data protection, EU policy, freedom of information, computer security and many other topics. In addition it provides a regular update on European Union developments, national news from more than 20 jurisdictions in both Europe and the Pacific Rim. It is looking for papers within the subject area that display good quality legal analysis and new lines of legal thought or policy development that go beyond mere description of the subject area, however accurate that may be.