指路:资源和信息来源如何影响儿童约束的适当使用

IF 3.3 3区 工程技术 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Journal of Transport & Health Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-07 DOI:10.1016/j.jth.2025.101983
Sjaan Koppel , Julie Mansfield , Emma Sartin
{"title":"指路:资源和信息来源如何影响儿童约束的适当使用","authors":"Sjaan Koppel ,&nbsp;Julie Mansfield ,&nbsp;Emma Sartin","doi":"10.1016/j.jth.2025.101983","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>This study examined the resources and information sources Australian parents and caregivers used for child occupant safety, focusing on their influence on appropriate restraint use for children 12 years and younger. <em>Method</em>: An online survey was conducted with 1853 participants, gathering data on socio-demographic characteristics, driving habits, crash and infringement history, and details of their children's restraint use.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>77.2% of parents/carers reported their children were appropriately restrained, with younger children (3 years and younger) more likely to be appropriately restrained than older children (7–12 years). Factors associated with parent/carer reported appropriate restraint use included being older (45+ years), female, higher education levels, higher household income, daily driving, regular seatbelt use, and fewer recent crashes or traffic infringements. The most common information sources were or vehicle manuals (97.0%), child restraint fitters/fitting stations (51.2%), online resources (47.0%), and advice from family and friends (44.3%). <em>Conclusions</em>: This study reveals low rates of parent/carer reported appropriate child restraint use (77.2%) among Australian caregivers, influenced by demographics and information sources. High reliance on CRS manuals, fitting stations, and online resources highlights the need for targeted interventions to improve child safety and inform stakeholder policies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47838,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Transport & Health","volume":"41 ","pages":"Article 101983"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Guiding the way: How resources and information sources influence appropriate child restraint use\",\"authors\":\"Sjaan Koppel ,&nbsp;Julie Mansfield ,&nbsp;Emma Sartin\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jth.2025.101983\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>This study examined the resources and information sources Australian parents and caregivers used for child occupant safety, focusing on their influence on appropriate restraint use for children 12 years and younger. <em>Method</em>: An online survey was conducted with 1853 participants, gathering data on socio-demographic characteristics, driving habits, crash and infringement history, and details of their children's restraint use.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>77.2% of parents/carers reported their children were appropriately restrained, with younger children (3 years and younger) more likely to be appropriately restrained than older children (7–12 years). Factors associated with parent/carer reported appropriate restraint use included being older (45+ years), female, higher education levels, higher household income, daily driving, regular seatbelt use, and fewer recent crashes or traffic infringements. The most common information sources were or vehicle manuals (97.0%), child restraint fitters/fitting stations (51.2%), online resources (47.0%), and advice from family and friends (44.3%). <em>Conclusions</em>: This study reveals low rates of parent/carer reported appropriate child restraint use (77.2%) among Australian caregivers, influenced by demographics and information sources. High reliance on CRS manuals, fitting stations, and online resources highlights the need for targeted interventions to improve child safety and inform stakeholder policies.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47838,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Transport & Health\",\"volume\":\"41 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101983\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Transport & Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214140525000039\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Transport & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214140525000039","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究调查了澳大利亚父母和照顾者用于儿童乘员安全的资源和信息来源,重点关注他们对12岁及以下儿童适当使用约束的影响。方法:对1853名儿童进行在线调查,收集其社会人口学特征、驾驶习惯、碰撞和侵权史以及使用约束装置的详细信息。结果77.2%的家长/照顾者报告其子女受到适当约束,年龄较小的儿童(3岁及以下)比年龄较大的儿童(7-12岁)更容易受到适当约束。与父母/照顾者报告的适当约束使用相关的因素包括年龄较大(45岁以上)、女性、高等教育水平、较高的家庭收入、日常驾驶、定期使用安全带以及最近发生的碰撞或交通违规较少。最常见的信息来源是车辆手册(97.0%)、儿童约束器/安装站(51.2%)、在线资源(47.0%)和家人和朋友的建议(44.3%)。结论:本研究显示,受人口统计和信息来源的影响,澳大利亚照顾者中报告适当使用儿童约束的父母/照顾者比例较低(77.2%)。对CRS手册、试衣站和在线资源的高度依赖突出了有针对性干预措施的必要性,以改善儿童安全并为利益攸关方政策提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Guiding the way: How resources and information sources influence appropriate child restraint use

Introduction

This study examined the resources and information sources Australian parents and caregivers used for child occupant safety, focusing on their influence on appropriate restraint use for children 12 years and younger. Method: An online survey was conducted with 1853 participants, gathering data on socio-demographic characteristics, driving habits, crash and infringement history, and details of their children's restraint use.

Results

77.2% of parents/carers reported their children were appropriately restrained, with younger children (3 years and younger) more likely to be appropriately restrained than older children (7–12 years). Factors associated with parent/carer reported appropriate restraint use included being older (45+ years), female, higher education levels, higher household income, daily driving, regular seatbelt use, and fewer recent crashes or traffic infringements. The most common information sources were or vehicle manuals (97.0%), child restraint fitters/fitting stations (51.2%), online resources (47.0%), and advice from family and friends (44.3%). Conclusions: This study reveals low rates of parent/carer reported appropriate child restraint use (77.2%) among Australian caregivers, influenced by demographics and information sources. High reliance on CRS manuals, fitting stations, and online resources highlights the need for targeted interventions to improve child safety and inform stakeholder policies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
196
审稿时长
69 days
期刊最新文献
Spatial assessment of electric vehicle transition scenarios for Türkiye's 2030 emission reduction targets Environmental exposure, terrain, and mode-specific sensitivity in bicycle demand: Implications for health-supportive urban mobility The journey matters: How do built environment and safety perceptions shape walking experiences around metro stations in Monterrey, Mexico? Substituting car trips with public and active transport in European urban areas: Quantifying potential modal shift across the EU27 Drivers' stress and blue light filtration: Combined SCR, HRV and VEP approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1