Moiz Bhai PhD, Mary Motolenich MS, David T. Mitchell PhD, Danny R. Hughes PhD
{"title":"高级执业注册护士参与妊娠事件:2008-2014年美国趋势","authors":"Moiz Bhai PhD, Mary Motolenich MS, David T. Mitchell PhD, Danny R. Hughes PhD","doi":"10.1016/S2155-8256(25)00034-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div><strong>Background:</strong> In the United States, states are increasingly adopting scope of practice reform to allow full practice authority (FPA) for advanced practice registered nurses (APRNs), such as nurse practitioners (NPs) and certified nurse midwives (CNMs). Little is known about the extent and trends of APRN participation in the care of patients during pregnancy episodes (i.e., the period from a woman’s last menstrual period to birth and resolution of all pregnancy-related outcomes) and whether their involvement changes with FPA.</div><div><strong>Purpose:</strong> To examine the participation of APRNs in office-based prenatal care between states that allow APRN FPA and those that do not.</div><div><strong>Methods:</strong> Using a retrospective commercial insurance claims database, we identified continuously enrolled females undergoing a pregnancy test and constructed comprehensive care information of each pregnancy episode. We then identified the proportion of episodes in which at least one prenatal office-based evaluation and management visit was performed by an APRN (i.e., involvement) and the share of these visits within a pregnancy episode performed by APRNs (i.e., intensity of involvement) for each year from 2008 to 2014 and compared intertemporal and geospatial trends. Statistical tests of differences in means and proportions were used to examine differences in APRN involvement and intensity between states that allow APRN FPA and those that do not.</div><div><strong>Results:</strong> Between 2008 and 2014, NP involvement increased 304% and CNM involvement increased 134%. Involvement increased in both FPA (NPs: 267%, CNMs: 106%) and non-FPA (NPs: 307%, CNMs: 156%) states over the sample period. Involvement was higher in FPA states (<em>p</em> < 0.001) for NPs and CNMs in all years. Intensity exhibited little variation across the sample.</div><div><strong>Conclusion:</strong> APRN involvement in care during pregnancy episodes has increased over time, although considerable variation exists between states.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46153,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nursing Regulation","volume":"15 4","pages":"Pages 51-59"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Advanced Practice Registered Nurse Involvement in Pregnancy Episodes: U.S. Trends From 2008–2014\",\"authors\":\"Moiz Bhai PhD, Mary Motolenich MS, David T. Mitchell PhD, Danny R. Hughes PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S2155-8256(25)00034-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div><strong>Background:</strong> In the United States, states are increasingly adopting scope of practice reform to allow full practice authority (FPA) for advanced practice registered nurses (APRNs), such as nurse practitioners (NPs) and certified nurse midwives (CNMs). Little is known about the extent and trends of APRN participation in the care of patients during pregnancy episodes (i.e., the period from a woman’s last menstrual period to birth and resolution of all pregnancy-related outcomes) and whether their involvement changes with FPA.</div><div><strong>Purpose:</strong> To examine the participation of APRNs in office-based prenatal care between states that allow APRN FPA and those that do not.</div><div><strong>Methods:</strong> Using a retrospective commercial insurance claims database, we identified continuously enrolled females undergoing a pregnancy test and constructed comprehensive care information of each pregnancy episode. We then identified the proportion of episodes in which at least one prenatal office-based evaluation and management visit was performed by an APRN (i.e., involvement) and the share of these visits within a pregnancy episode performed by APRNs (i.e., intensity of involvement) for each year from 2008 to 2014 and compared intertemporal and geospatial trends. Statistical tests of differences in means and proportions were used to examine differences in APRN involvement and intensity between states that allow APRN FPA and those that do not.</div><div><strong>Results:</strong> Between 2008 and 2014, NP involvement increased 304% and CNM involvement increased 134%. Involvement increased in both FPA (NPs: 267%, CNMs: 106%) and non-FPA (NPs: 307%, CNMs: 156%) states over the sample period. Involvement was higher in FPA states (<em>p</em> < 0.001) for NPs and CNMs in all years. Intensity exhibited little variation across the sample.</div><div><strong>Conclusion:</strong> APRN involvement in care during pregnancy episodes has increased over time, although considerable variation exists between states.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46153,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Nursing Regulation\",\"volume\":\"15 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 51-59\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Nursing Regulation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2155825625000341\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nursing Regulation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2155825625000341","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Advanced Practice Registered Nurse Involvement in Pregnancy Episodes: U.S. Trends From 2008–2014
Background: In the United States, states are increasingly adopting scope of practice reform to allow full practice authority (FPA) for advanced practice registered nurses (APRNs), such as nurse practitioners (NPs) and certified nurse midwives (CNMs). Little is known about the extent and trends of APRN participation in the care of patients during pregnancy episodes (i.e., the period from a woman’s last menstrual period to birth and resolution of all pregnancy-related outcomes) and whether their involvement changes with FPA.
Purpose: To examine the participation of APRNs in office-based prenatal care between states that allow APRN FPA and those that do not.
Methods: Using a retrospective commercial insurance claims database, we identified continuously enrolled females undergoing a pregnancy test and constructed comprehensive care information of each pregnancy episode. We then identified the proportion of episodes in which at least one prenatal office-based evaluation and management visit was performed by an APRN (i.e., involvement) and the share of these visits within a pregnancy episode performed by APRNs (i.e., intensity of involvement) for each year from 2008 to 2014 and compared intertemporal and geospatial trends. Statistical tests of differences in means and proportions were used to examine differences in APRN involvement and intensity between states that allow APRN FPA and those that do not.
Results: Between 2008 and 2014, NP involvement increased 304% and CNM involvement increased 134%. Involvement increased in both FPA (NPs: 267%, CNMs: 106%) and non-FPA (NPs: 307%, CNMs: 156%) states over the sample period. Involvement was higher in FPA states (p < 0.001) for NPs and CNMs in all years. Intensity exhibited little variation across the sample.
Conclusion: APRN involvement in care during pregnancy episodes has increased over time, although considerable variation exists between states.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Nursing Regulation (JNR), the official journal of the National Council of State Boards of Nursing (NCSBN®), is a quarterly, peer-reviewed, academic and professional journal. It publishes scholarly articles that advance the science of nursing regulation, promote the mission and vision of NCSBN, and enhance communication and collaboration among nurse regulators, educators, practitioners, and the scientific community. The journal supports evidence-based regulation, addresses issues related to patient safety, and highlights current nursing regulatory issues, programs, and projects in both the United States and the international community. In publishing JNR, NCSBN''s goal is to develop and share knowledge related to nursing and other healthcare regulation across continents and to promote a greater awareness of regulatory issues among all nurses.