贝叶斯优化实验设计的两阶段Kriging方法

IF 4.1 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-04 DOI:10.1016/j.probengmech.2024.103724
Cibelle Dias de Carvalho Dantas Maia , Rafael Holdorf Lopez , André Jacomel Torii , Leandro Fleck Fadel Miguel
{"title":"贝叶斯优化实验设计的两阶段Kriging方法","authors":"Cibelle Dias de Carvalho Dantas Maia ,&nbsp;Rafael Holdorf Lopez ,&nbsp;André Jacomel Torii ,&nbsp;Leandro Fleck Fadel Miguel","doi":"10.1016/j.probengmech.2024.103724","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper presents a two-stage Kriging framework designed to efficiently tackle Bayesian optimal experiment design (OED) problems. To enhance computational efficiency in evaluating the Shannon expected information gain (SEIG), we introduced a Kriging surrogate as a replacement for the original forward model (stage 1 Kriging). This surrogate is utilized within the Double Loop Monte Carlo method for SEIG estimation. We employed the Efficient Global Optimization (EGO) framework as the optimizer, which requires the construction of a Kriging surrogate of the SEIG (stage 2 Kriging). Within EGO, the expected improvement infill criterion was employed as the active learning metric. The underlying rationale of employing a two-stage Kriging approach is to alleviate the curse of dimensionality typically associated with Kriging surrogates. In this strategy, the first stage of Kriging is focused on surrogating the random parameter space, while the second stage is dedicated to modeling the design variable space. By adopting this two-stage approach, the need for constructing a global surrogate for the forward model in both spaces is circumvented. This segmentation allows for more efficient and accurate surrogate modeling, particularly in high-dimensional spaces, enhancing the overall computational performance of the optimization process. The method was applied to three OED problems. The results demonstrate that the proposed two-stage Kriging approach (EGO-KR) effectively addressed the analyzed problems, offering good precision and significant computational savings, particularly in the third and more complex example.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54583,"journal":{"name":"Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics","volume":"79 ","pages":"Article 103724"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A two stage Kriging approach for Bayesian optimal experimental design\",\"authors\":\"Cibelle Dias de Carvalho Dantas Maia ,&nbsp;Rafael Holdorf Lopez ,&nbsp;André Jacomel Torii ,&nbsp;Leandro Fleck Fadel Miguel\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.probengmech.2024.103724\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This paper presents a two-stage Kriging framework designed to efficiently tackle Bayesian optimal experiment design (OED) problems. To enhance computational efficiency in evaluating the Shannon expected information gain (SEIG), we introduced a Kriging surrogate as a replacement for the original forward model (stage 1 Kriging). This surrogate is utilized within the Double Loop Monte Carlo method for SEIG estimation. We employed the Efficient Global Optimization (EGO) framework as the optimizer, which requires the construction of a Kriging surrogate of the SEIG (stage 2 Kriging). Within EGO, the expected improvement infill criterion was employed as the active learning metric. The underlying rationale of employing a two-stage Kriging approach is to alleviate the curse of dimensionality typically associated with Kriging surrogates. In this strategy, the first stage of Kriging is focused on surrogating the random parameter space, while the second stage is dedicated to modeling the design variable space. By adopting this two-stage approach, the need for constructing a global surrogate for the forward model in both spaces is circumvented. This segmentation allows for more efficient and accurate surrogate modeling, particularly in high-dimensional spaces, enhancing the overall computational performance of the optimization process. The method was applied to three OED problems. The results demonstrate that the proposed two-stage Kriging approach (EGO-KR) effectively addressed the analyzed problems, offering good precision and significant computational savings, particularly in the third and more complex example.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54583,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics\",\"volume\":\"79 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103724\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0266892024001462\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0266892024001462","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文提出了一个两阶段的Kriging框架,旨在有效地解决贝叶斯最优实验设计(OED)问题。为了提高评估香农预期信息增益(SEIG)的计算效率,我们引入了Kriging代理来替代原始的正演模型(阶段1 Kriging)。该代理在双环蒙特卡罗方法中用于SEIG估计。我们采用高效全局优化(EGO)框架作为优化器,这需要构建SEIG的Kriging代理(阶段2 Kriging)。在EGO中,期望改进填充标准被用作主动学习度量。采用两阶段克里格方法的基本原理是减轻通常与克里格替代相关联的维度诅咒。在该策略中,Kriging的第一阶段侧重于随机参数空间的代入,第二阶段侧重于设计变量空间的建模。通过采用这种两阶段方法,可以避免在两个空间中为前向模型构造全局代理的需要。这种分割允许更有效和准确的代理建模,特别是在高维空间中,增强优化过程的整体计算性能。该方法应用于三个OED问题。结果表明,所提出的两阶段Kriging方法(EGO-KR)有效地解决了所分析的问题,提供了良好的精度和显著的计算节省,特别是在第三个更复杂的例子中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A two stage Kriging approach for Bayesian optimal experimental design
This paper presents a two-stage Kriging framework designed to efficiently tackle Bayesian optimal experiment design (OED) problems. To enhance computational efficiency in evaluating the Shannon expected information gain (SEIG), we introduced a Kriging surrogate as a replacement for the original forward model (stage 1 Kriging). This surrogate is utilized within the Double Loop Monte Carlo method for SEIG estimation. We employed the Efficient Global Optimization (EGO) framework as the optimizer, which requires the construction of a Kriging surrogate of the SEIG (stage 2 Kriging). Within EGO, the expected improvement infill criterion was employed as the active learning metric. The underlying rationale of employing a two-stage Kriging approach is to alleviate the curse of dimensionality typically associated with Kriging surrogates. In this strategy, the first stage of Kriging is focused on surrogating the random parameter space, while the second stage is dedicated to modeling the design variable space. By adopting this two-stage approach, the need for constructing a global surrogate for the forward model in both spaces is circumvented. This segmentation allows for more efficient and accurate surrogate modeling, particularly in high-dimensional spaces, enhancing the overall computational performance of the optimization process. The method was applied to three OED problems. The results demonstrate that the proposed two-stage Kriging approach (EGO-KR) effectively addressed the analyzed problems, offering good precision and significant computational savings, particularly in the third and more complex example.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics
Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics 工程技术-工程:机械
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
15.40%
发文量
98
审稿时长
13.5 months
期刊介绍: This journal provides a forum for scholarly work dealing primarily with probabilistic and statistical approaches to contemporary solid/structural and fluid mechanics problems encountered in diverse technical disciplines such as aerospace, civil, marine, mechanical, and nuclear engineering. The journal aims to maintain a healthy balance between general solution techniques and problem-specific results, encouraging a fruitful exchange of ideas among disparate engineering specialities.
期刊最新文献
Sensitivity analysis for the output boundary of numerical models involving truncated probabilistic distributions Stochastic stability of pile foundations under combined static, harmonic and stochastic bounded noise excitations PIV-based analysis of experimentally simulated downburst-like wall jet outflows in a large-scale experimental facility: Flow characterization and future perspectives A fused OCEM-DER-Bayesian framework for quantitative FMEA: Dynamic risk assessment of HPCR fuel injection failures in low-speed engines A non-probabilistic rotating hyper-cone-based sampling method for reliability analysis of structures with correlated uncertainties
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1