机器人运动规划:基于采样的规划器综述

IF 5.4 Biomimetic Intelligence and Robotics Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-04 DOI:10.1016/j.birob.2024.100207
Liding Zhang , Kuanqi Cai , Zewei Sun , Zhenshan Bing , Chaoqun Wang , Luis Figueredo , Sami Haddadin , Alois Knoll
{"title":"机器人运动规划:基于采样的规划器综述","authors":"Liding Zhang ,&nbsp;Kuanqi Cai ,&nbsp;Zewei Sun ,&nbsp;Zhenshan Bing ,&nbsp;Chaoqun Wang ,&nbsp;Luis Figueredo ,&nbsp;Sami Haddadin ,&nbsp;Alois Knoll","doi":"10.1016/j.birob.2024.100207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Recent advancements in robotics have transformed industries such as manufacturing, logistics, surgery, and planetary exploration. A key challenge is developing efficient motion planning algorithms that allow robots to navigate complex environments while avoiding collisions and optimizing metrics like path length, sweep area, execution time, and energy consumption. Among the available algorithms, sampling-based methods have gained the most traction in both research and industry due to their ability to handle complex environments, explore free space, and offer probabilistic completeness along with other formal guarantees. Despite their widespread application, significant challenges still remain. To advance future planning algorithms, it is essential to review the current state-of-the-art solutions and their limitations. In this context, this work aims to shed light on these challenges and assess the development and applicability of sampling-based methods. Furthermore, we aim to provide an in-depth analysis of the design and evaluation of ten of the most popular planners across various scenarios. Our findings highlight the strides made in sampling-based methods while underscoring persistent challenges. This work offers an overview of the important ongoing research in robotic motion planning.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100184,"journal":{"name":"Biomimetic Intelligence and Robotics","volume":"5 1","pages":"Article 100207"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Motion planning for robotics: A review for sampling-based planners\",\"authors\":\"Liding Zhang ,&nbsp;Kuanqi Cai ,&nbsp;Zewei Sun ,&nbsp;Zhenshan Bing ,&nbsp;Chaoqun Wang ,&nbsp;Luis Figueredo ,&nbsp;Sami Haddadin ,&nbsp;Alois Knoll\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.birob.2024.100207\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Recent advancements in robotics have transformed industries such as manufacturing, logistics, surgery, and planetary exploration. A key challenge is developing efficient motion planning algorithms that allow robots to navigate complex environments while avoiding collisions and optimizing metrics like path length, sweep area, execution time, and energy consumption. Among the available algorithms, sampling-based methods have gained the most traction in both research and industry due to their ability to handle complex environments, explore free space, and offer probabilistic completeness along with other formal guarantees. Despite their widespread application, significant challenges still remain. To advance future planning algorithms, it is essential to review the current state-of-the-art solutions and their limitations. In this context, this work aims to shed light on these challenges and assess the development and applicability of sampling-based methods. Furthermore, we aim to provide an in-depth analysis of the design and evaluation of ten of the most popular planners across various scenarios. Our findings highlight the strides made in sampling-based methods while underscoring persistent challenges. This work offers an overview of the important ongoing research in robotic motion planning.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100184,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biomimetic Intelligence and Robotics\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"Article 100207\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biomimetic Intelligence and Robotics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667379724000652\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomimetic Intelligence and Robotics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667379724000652","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

最近机器人技术的进步已经改变了制造业、物流、外科手术和行星探索等行业。一个关键的挑战是开发有效的运动规划算法,使机器人能够在复杂的环境中导航,同时避免碰撞,并优化路径长度、扫描面积、执行时间和能耗等指标。在现有的算法中,基于抽样的方法在研究和工业中都获得了最大的吸引力,因为它们能够处理复杂的环境,探索自由空间,并提供概率完整性以及其他形式保证。尽管它们得到了广泛的应用,但仍然存在重大挑战。为了推进未来的规划算法,有必要回顾当前最先进的解决方案及其局限性。在这种情况下,这项工作旨在阐明这些挑战,并评估基于抽样的方法的发展和适用性。此外,我们的目标是深入分析各种场景下最受欢迎的十个规划器的设计和评估。我们的研究结果突出了基于抽样的方法取得的进步,同时强调了持续的挑战。这项工作提供了一个重要的正在进行的研究概述机器人运动规划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Motion planning for robotics: A review for sampling-based planners
Recent advancements in robotics have transformed industries such as manufacturing, logistics, surgery, and planetary exploration. A key challenge is developing efficient motion planning algorithms that allow robots to navigate complex environments while avoiding collisions and optimizing metrics like path length, sweep area, execution time, and energy consumption. Among the available algorithms, sampling-based methods have gained the most traction in both research and industry due to their ability to handle complex environments, explore free space, and offer probabilistic completeness along with other formal guarantees. Despite their widespread application, significant challenges still remain. To advance future planning algorithms, it is essential to review the current state-of-the-art solutions and their limitations. In this context, this work aims to shed light on these challenges and assess the development and applicability of sampling-based methods. Furthermore, we aim to provide an in-depth analysis of the design and evaluation of ten of the most popular planners across various scenarios. Our findings highlight the strides made in sampling-based methods while underscoring persistent challenges. This work offers an overview of the important ongoing research in robotic motion planning.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Impact of the pectoral fin geometry on the gliding performance of flying fish robot MOSformer: Momentum encoder-based inter-slice fusion transformer for medical image segmentation Coupled dynamic modeling, identification and experimental validation of a hydraulically driven soft robotic arm Robotic fish with tunable stiffness soft tail based on bionic spinal muscle system Validation of a thoraco-abdominal motion phantom for robotic surgery’s respiration tracking study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1