人工智能驱动测量髋关节形态评估的验证

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING European Journal of Radiology Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-31 DOI:10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111911
Louis Lassalle , Nor-eddine Regnard , Marion Durteste , Jeanne Ventre , Vincent Marty , Lauryane Clovis , Zekun Zhang , Nicolas Nitche , Alexis Ducarouge , Alexia Tran , Jean-Denis Laredo , Ali Guermazi
{"title":"人工智能驱动测量髋关节形态评估的验证","authors":"Louis Lassalle ,&nbsp;Nor-eddine Regnard ,&nbsp;Marion Durteste ,&nbsp;Jeanne Ventre ,&nbsp;Vincent Marty ,&nbsp;Lauryane Clovis ,&nbsp;Zekun Zhang ,&nbsp;Nicolas Nitche ,&nbsp;Alexis Ducarouge ,&nbsp;Alexia Tran ,&nbsp;Jean-Denis Laredo ,&nbsp;Ali Guermazi","doi":"10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111911","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Rationale and Objectives</h3><div>Accurate assessment of hip morphology is crucial for the diagnosis and management of hip pathologies. Traditional manual measurements are prone to mistakes and inter- and intra-reader variability. Artificial intelligence (AI) could mitigate such issues by providing accurate and reproducible measurements. The aim of this study was to compare the performance of BoneMetrics (Gleamer, Paris, France) in measuring pelvic and hip parameters on anteroposterior (AP) and false profile radiographs to expert manual measurements.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div>This retrospective study included AP and false profile pelvic radiographs collected from private practices in France. Pelvic and hip measurements included the femoral neck shaft angle, lateral center edge angle, acetabular roof angle, pelvic obliquity, and vertical center anterior angle. AI measurements were compared to a ground truth established by two expert radiologists. Performance metrics included mean absolute error (MAE), Bland-Altman analysis, and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>AI measurements were performed on AP views from 88 patients and on false profile views from 60 patients. They demonstrated high accuracy, with MAE values inferior to 0.5 mm for pelvic obliquity and inferior to 4.2° for all pelvic angles on both views. ICC values indicated good to excellent agreement between AI measurements and the ground truth (0.78–0.99). Notably, no significant differences were found in AI measurement accuracy between patients with normal and abnormal acetabular coverage.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The application of AI in measuring pelvic and hip parameters on AP and false profile radiographs demonstrates promising outcomes. The results reveal that these AI-powered measurements provide accurate estimations and show strong agreement with expert manual measurements. Ultimately, the use of AI has the potential to enhance the reproducibility of measurements as part of comprehensive hip assessments, thereby improving diagnostic accuracy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12063,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Radiology","volume":"183 ","pages":"Article 111911"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of AI-driven measurements for hip morphology assessment\",\"authors\":\"Louis Lassalle ,&nbsp;Nor-eddine Regnard ,&nbsp;Marion Durteste ,&nbsp;Jeanne Ventre ,&nbsp;Vincent Marty ,&nbsp;Lauryane Clovis ,&nbsp;Zekun Zhang ,&nbsp;Nicolas Nitche ,&nbsp;Alexis Ducarouge ,&nbsp;Alexia Tran ,&nbsp;Jean-Denis Laredo ,&nbsp;Ali Guermazi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111911\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Rationale and Objectives</h3><div>Accurate assessment of hip morphology is crucial for the diagnosis and management of hip pathologies. Traditional manual measurements are prone to mistakes and inter- and intra-reader variability. Artificial intelligence (AI) could mitigate such issues by providing accurate and reproducible measurements. The aim of this study was to compare the performance of BoneMetrics (Gleamer, Paris, France) in measuring pelvic and hip parameters on anteroposterior (AP) and false profile radiographs to expert manual measurements.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div>This retrospective study included AP and false profile pelvic radiographs collected from private practices in France. Pelvic and hip measurements included the femoral neck shaft angle, lateral center edge angle, acetabular roof angle, pelvic obliquity, and vertical center anterior angle. AI measurements were compared to a ground truth established by two expert radiologists. Performance metrics included mean absolute error (MAE), Bland-Altman analysis, and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>AI measurements were performed on AP views from 88 patients and on false profile views from 60 patients. They demonstrated high accuracy, with MAE values inferior to 0.5 mm for pelvic obliquity and inferior to 4.2° for all pelvic angles on both views. ICC values indicated good to excellent agreement between AI measurements and the ground truth (0.78–0.99). Notably, no significant differences were found in AI measurement accuracy between patients with normal and abnormal acetabular coverage.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The application of AI in measuring pelvic and hip parameters on AP and false profile radiographs demonstrates promising outcomes. The results reveal that these AI-powered measurements provide accurate estimations and show strong agreement with expert manual measurements. Ultimately, the use of AI has the potential to enhance the reproducibility of measurements as part of comprehensive hip assessments, thereby improving diagnostic accuracy.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12063,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Radiology\",\"volume\":\"183 \",\"pages\":\"Article 111911\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0720048X24006272\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/31 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0720048X24006272","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

理由和目的准确评估髋关节形态对髋关节病变的诊断和治疗至关重要。传统的人工测量容易出现错误,并且容易出现阅读器之间和阅读器内部的差异。人工智能(AI)可以通过提供准确和可重复的测量来缓解这些问题。本研究的目的是比较BoneMetrics (Gleamer, Paris, France)在骨盆和髋关节正位(AP)和假侧位x线片上测量骨盆和髋关节参数与专家手动测量的性能。材料和方法本回顾性研究包括从法国私人诊所收集的骨盆正位和假侧位x线片。骨盆和髋部测量包括股骨颈轴角、外侧中心边缘角、髋臼顶角、骨盆倾斜度和垂直中心前角。人工智能测量结果与两名放射科专家建立的基础事实进行了比较。性能指标包括平均绝对误差(MAE)、Bland-Altman分析和类内相关系数(ICC)。结果对88例患者的AP视图和60例患者的假侧面视图进行了测量。他们表现出很高的准确性,在两种视图上,骨盆倾角的MAE值低于0.5 mm,所有骨盆角度的MAE值低于4.2°。ICC值表明人工智能测量值与地面真实值(0.78-0.99)之间的一致性良好至极好。值得注意的是,在髋臼覆盖正常和异常的患者之间,AI测量的准确性没有显著差异。结论应用人工智能测量骨盆和髋关节参数在AP和假位片上具有良好的效果。结果表明,这些人工智能测量提供了准确的估计,并与专家手动测量结果高度一致。最终,作为髋关节综合评估的一部分,人工智能的使用有可能提高测量的可重复性,从而提高诊断的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Validation of AI-driven measurements for hip morphology assessment

Rationale and Objectives

Accurate assessment of hip morphology is crucial for the diagnosis and management of hip pathologies. Traditional manual measurements are prone to mistakes and inter- and intra-reader variability. Artificial intelligence (AI) could mitigate such issues by providing accurate and reproducible measurements. The aim of this study was to compare the performance of BoneMetrics (Gleamer, Paris, France) in measuring pelvic and hip parameters on anteroposterior (AP) and false profile radiographs to expert manual measurements.

Materials and Methods

This retrospective study included AP and false profile pelvic radiographs collected from private practices in France. Pelvic and hip measurements included the femoral neck shaft angle, lateral center edge angle, acetabular roof angle, pelvic obliquity, and vertical center anterior angle. AI measurements were compared to a ground truth established by two expert radiologists. Performance metrics included mean absolute error (MAE), Bland-Altman analysis, and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC).

Results

AI measurements were performed on AP views from 88 patients and on false profile views from 60 patients. They demonstrated high accuracy, with MAE values inferior to 0.5 mm for pelvic obliquity and inferior to 4.2° for all pelvic angles on both views. ICC values indicated good to excellent agreement between AI measurements and the ground truth (0.78–0.99). Notably, no significant differences were found in AI measurement accuracy between patients with normal and abnormal acetabular coverage.

Conclusion

The application of AI in measuring pelvic and hip parameters on AP and false profile radiographs demonstrates promising outcomes. The results reveal that these AI-powered measurements provide accurate estimations and show strong agreement with expert manual measurements. Ultimately, the use of AI has the potential to enhance the reproducibility of measurements as part of comprehensive hip assessments, thereby improving diagnostic accuracy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
3.00%
发文量
398
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: European Journal of Radiology is an international journal which aims to communicate to its readers, state-of-the-art information on imaging developments in the form of high quality original research articles and timely reviews on current developments in the field. Its audience includes clinicians at all levels of training including radiology trainees, newly qualified imaging specialists and the experienced radiologist. Its aim is to inform efficient, appropriate and evidence-based imaging practice to the benefit of patients worldwide.
期刊最新文献
Deep learning reconstruction for liver DWI: impact on image quality and ADC quantification Simultaneous multi-slice diffusion weighted imaging of hepatocellular carcinoma at 3.0 T: Comparison of breath-hold, free-breathing, and respiratory-triggered techniques Artificial intelligence denoising in cardiac photon-counting CT: mitigating BMI-related noise degradation while maintaining clinical interchangeability Structured MRI reporting in patients with deep pelvic endometriosis: performance and clinical impact of the deep pelvic endometriosis index (dPEI) Use of Artificial Intelligence in prostate MRI: A rapid scoping review highlighting limited evidence in screening context
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1