基于数据分割和堆叠卷积自编码器的核电厂多系统相似故障鲁棒诊断方法

IF 2.3 3区 工程技术 Q1 NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Annals of Nuclear Energy Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-28 DOI:10.1016/j.anucene.2024.111178
Xin Ai, Yongkuo Liu, Longfei Shan, Jiarong Gao, Wanzhou Zhang
{"title":"基于数据分割和堆叠卷积自编码器的核电厂多系统相似故障鲁棒诊断方法","authors":"Xin Ai,&nbsp;Yongkuo Liu,&nbsp;Longfei Shan,&nbsp;Jiarong Gao,&nbsp;Wanzhou Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.anucene.2024.111178","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Nuclear power plants consist of multiple subsystems characterized by nonlinear correlations, numerous monitoring parameters, and faults with similar characteristics. These similar faults often exhibit closely distributed data points, resulting in unclear classification boundaries and reduced diagnostic accuracy for fault detection algorithms. A single deep learning model cannot establish a diagnostic model that is broad in scope, highly accurate, and robust. This paper proposes a robust, multi-system similar fault diagnosis model for nuclear power plants, combining K-Means and Stacked Convolutional Autoencoders (KSCAE). First, K-Means data segmentation model partitions complex multi-system fault data into several similar data clusters. Then, specialized diagnostic models are developed for each cluster using powerful stacked convolutional autoencoders to focus on learning and classifying similar faults. Testing across three nuclear power plant fault diagnosis scenarios based on data from the Fuqing nuclear power plant simulator demonstrates that KSCAE outperforms single deep learning models in diagnostic accuracy, particularly when fault severity differs between training and testing sets. The results show that the KSCAE algorithm achieves a maximum accuracy of 99.31% and a minimum accuracy of 79.11% under severe noise and data distribution differences. Compared to the baseline algorithms, KSCAE achieves an average accuracy improvement of up to approximately 20% across multiple tests, particularly in Scenario 2. This study demonstrates the effectiveness and robustness of the proposed model for diagnosing similar faults, providing a reliable approach for multi-system fault diagnosis in nuclear power plants.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8006,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Nuclear Energy","volume":"213 ","pages":"Article 111178"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A robust diagnosis method specifically for similar faults in nuclear power plant multi-systems based on data segmentation and stacked convolutional autoencoders\",\"authors\":\"Xin Ai,&nbsp;Yongkuo Liu,&nbsp;Longfei Shan,&nbsp;Jiarong Gao,&nbsp;Wanzhou Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.anucene.2024.111178\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Nuclear power plants consist of multiple subsystems characterized by nonlinear correlations, numerous monitoring parameters, and faults with similar characteristics. These similar faults often exhibit closely distributed data points, resulting in unclear classification boundaries and reduced diagnostic accuracy for fault detection algorithms. A single deep learning model cannot establish a diagnostic model that is broad in scope, highly accurate, and robust. This paper proposes a robust, multi-system similar fault diagnosis model for nuclear power plants, combining K-Means and Stacked Convolutional Autoencoders (KSCAE). First, K-Means data segmentation model partitions complex multi-system fault data into several similar data clusters. Then, specialized diagnostic models are developed for each cluster using powerful stacked convolutional autoencoders to focus on learning and classifying similar faults. Testing across three nuclear power plant fault diagnosis scenarios based on data from the Fuqing nuclear power plant simulator demonstrates that KSCAE outperforms single deep learning models in diagnostic accuracy, particularly when fault severity differs between training and testing sets. The results show that the KSCAE algorithm achieves a maximum accuracy of 99.31% and a minimum accuracy of 79.11% under severe noise and data distribution differences. Compared to the baseline algorithms, KSCAE achieves an average accuracy improvement of up to approximately 20% across multiple tests, particularly in Scenario 2. This study demonstrates the effectiveness and robustness of the proposed model for diagnosing similar faults, providing a reliable approach for multi-system fault diagnosis in nuclear power plants.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8006,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Nuclear Energy\",\"volume\":\"213 \",\"pages\":\"Article 111178\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Nuclear Energy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306454924008417\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Nuclear Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306454924008417","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

核电厂由多个子系统组成,这些子系统具有非线性相关性,监测参数众多,故障特征相似。这些相似的故障往往表现出紧密分布的数据点,导致分类边界不明确,降低了故障检测算法的诊断准确性。单一的深度学习模型无法建立范围广泛、高度准确和鲁棒的诊断模型。本文提出了一种结合k均值和堆叠卷积自编码器(KSCAE)的核电厂鲁棒多系统相似故障诊断模型。首先,K-Means数据分割模型将复杂的多系统故障数据划分为几个相似的数据簇。然后,使用强大的堆叠卷积自编码器为每个聚类建立专门的诊断模型,专注于学习和分类相似故障。基于福清核电站模拟器数据的三种核电站故障诊断场景测试表明,KSCAE在诊断准确性方面优于单一深度学习模型,特别是当训练集和测试集的故障严重程度不同时。结果表明,在噪声和数据分布差异较大的情况下,KSCAE算法的最大准确率为99.31%,最小准确率为79.11%。与基线算法相比,KSCAE在多个测试中的平均准确率提高了约20%,特别是在场景2中。研究结果表明,该模型对相似故障诊断的有效性和鲁棒性,为核电厂多系统故障诊断提供了一种可靠的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A robust diagnosis method specifically for similar faults in nuclear power plant multi-systems based on data segmentation and stacked convolutional autoencoders
Nuclear power plants consist of multiple subsystems characterized by nonlinear correlations, numerous monitoring parameters, and faults with similar characteristics. These similar faults often exhibit closely distributed data points, resulting in unclear classification boundaries and reduced diagnostic accuracy for fault detection algorithms. A single deep learning model cannot establish a diagnostic model that is broad in scope, highly accurate, and robust. This paper proposes a robust, multi-system similar fault diagnosis model for nuclear power plants, combining K-Means and Stacked Convolutional Autoencoders (KSCAE). First, K-Means data segmentation model partitions complex multi-system fault data into several similar data clusters. Then, specialized diagnostic models are developed for each cluster using powerful stacked convolutional autoencoders to focus on learning and classifying similar faults. Testing across three nuclear power plant fault diagnosis scenarios based on data from the Fuqing nuclear power plant simulator demonstrates that KSCAE outperforms single deep learning models in diagnostic accuracy, particularly when fault severity differs between training and testing sets. The results show that the KSCAE algorithm achieves a maximum accuracy of 99.31% and a minimum accuracy of 79.11% under severe noise and data distribution differences. Compared to the baseline algorithms, KSCAE achieves an average accuracy improvement of up to approximately 20% across multiple tests, particularly in Scenario 2. This study demonstrates the effectiveness and robustness of the proposed model for diagnosing similar faults, providing a reliable approach for multi-system fault diagnosis in nuclear power plants.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Nuclear Energy
Annals of Nuclear Energy 工程技术-核科学技术
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
21.10%
发文量
632
审稿时长
7.3 months
期刊介绍: Annals of Nuclear Energy provides an international medium for the communication of original research, ideas and developments in all areas of the field of nuclear energy science and technology. Its scope embraces nuclear fuel reserves, fuel cycles and cost, materials, processing, system and component technology (fission only), design and optimization, direct conversion of nuclear energy sources, environmental control, reactor physics, heat transfer and fluid dynamics, structural analysis, fuel management, future developments, nuclear fuel and safety, nuclear aerosol, neutron physics, computer technology (both software and hardware), risk assessment, radioactive waste disposal and reactor thermal hydraulics. Papers submitted to Annals need to demonstrate a clear link to nuclear power generation/nuclear engineering. Papers which deal with pure nuclear physics, pure health physics, imaging, or attenuation and shielding properties of concretes and various geological materials are not within the scope of the journal. Also, papers that deal with policy or economics are not within the scope of the journal.
期刊最新文献
Design of cross-coupled conditional sliding fuzzy control and high gain observer for robust control of pressurized heavy water reactor A set of fictitious fuel cycle test cases for simulator demonstration and benchmarking Flow instability characteristics of supercritical water in parallel vertical tubes under semicircular heating conditions Numerical study of plate-type fuel melting and melt migration behavior caused by flow blockage accidents Mechanism and engineering evaluation of multi-element removal in lead-bismuth fast reactor concentrate using commercial ion exchange resins
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1