儿童骨盆尤文氏肉瘤的剂量递增:来自国家培训计划的见解

IF 7.4 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-03 DOI:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.11.020
L. Ollivier , F. Goudjil , S. Raucoules , C. Moignier , D. Maneval , C. Bartau , G. Hangard , D. Trauchessec , V. Anthonipillai , C. Lafond , W. Gehin , T. Lacornerie , L. Claude , G. Beldjoudi
{"title":"儿童骨盆尤文氏肉瘤的剂量递增:来自国家培训计划的见解","authors":"L. Ollivier ,&nbsp;F. Goudjil ,&nbsp;S. Raucoules ,&nbsp;C. Moignier ,&nbsp;D. Maneval ,&nbsp;C. Bartau ,&nbsp;G. Hangard ,&nbsp;D. Trauchessec ,&nbsp;V. Anthonipillai ,&nbsp;C. Lafond ,&nbsp;W. Gehin ,&nbsp;T. Lacornerie ,&nbsp;L. Claude ,&nbsp;G. Beldjoudi","doi":"10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.11.020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The Inter Ewing-1 trial investigates dose escalation in definitive radiotherapy (randomization 54Gy versus 64.8Gy). Before opening the trial, a national training initiative was conducted by the French Pediatric Radiotherapy Group (GFRP) to assess dosimetric discrepancies in definitive RT with dose escalation.</div></div><div><h3>Methods and Materials</h3><div>A large non-operated pelvic pediatric case of Ewing's sarcoma was selected. Delineated structures associated with CT-scan were distributed to participants, all of whom were accredited for pediatric radio- and/or proton-therapy. Treatment planning involved a simultaneous integrated boost: 54Gy in 30 fractions (1.80Gy/fraction) for the pre-chemotherapy tumor volume and 63.9Gy (2.13Gy/fraction) for the post-chemotherapy volume. Dose constraints for organs-at-risk and target coverage were provided. All treatment plans for photons and protons were collected, analyzed for minor and major deviations and compared using 21 dosimetric criteria.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Eleven French centers participated, submitting 14 plans (10 photon/4 proton plans). One photon plan showed a minor deviation in CTV coverage (V60.7GyCTV=98.8%, expected value=100%), and another one exhibited two minor deviations in organ-at-risk constraints (V55GyBowel=32cc [limit:28 cc] and V50GyRectum=52.4% [limit:50%]). No significant difference was observed between photons and protons in target coverage for PTV63.9Gy(p=0.95) and CTV63.9Gy(p=0.66), as well as in sparing the most critical organs. However, significant differences were reported in favor of protons regarding the integral dose criterion (p&lt;0.01), DmeanBowel(9.9±1.1Gy for photons vs 4.1±1.3 Gy for protons, p&lt;0.01), and DmeanAnalCanal(3.9±0.7Gy for photons vs 2.2±0.9Gy for protons, p&lt;0.01).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This national training initiative provided French centers conducting pediatric radio/proton-therapy with an initial insight into the Ewing-1 protocol. Analysis showed a good treatment planning homogeneity between the centers and a successful adhesion to the dose escalation arm constraints. Protons did not demonstrate considerable advantages for this particular clinical case except with respect to the limitation of integral dose.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14215,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics","volume":"121 3","pages":"Page e4"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dose Escalation in Pediatric Pelvic Ewing's Sarcoma: Insights from a National Training Initiative\",\"authors\":\"L. Ollivier ,&nbsp;F. Goudjil ,&nbsp;S. Raucoules ,&nbsp;C. Moignier ,&nbsp;D. Maneval ,&nbsp;C. Bartau ,&nbsp;G. Hangard ,&nbsp;D. Trauchessec ,&nbsp;V. Anthonipillai ,&nbsp;C. Lafond ,&nbsp;W. Gehin ,&nbsp;T. Lacornerie ,&nbsp;L. Claude ,&nbsp;G. Beldjoudi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.11.020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The Inter Ewing-1 trial investigates dose escalation in definitive radiotherapy (randomization 54Gy versus 64.8Gy). Before opening the trial, a national training initiative was conducted by the French Pediatric Radiotherapy Group (GFRP) to assess dosimetric discrepancies in definitive RT with dose escalation.</div></div><div><h3>Methods and Materials</h3><div>A large non-operated pelvic pediatric case of Ewing's sarcoma was selected. Delineated structures associated with CT-scan were distributed to participants, all of whom were accredited for pediatric radio- and/or proton-therapy. Treatment planning involved a simultaneous integrated boost: 54Gy in 30 fractions (1.80Gy/fraction) for the pre-chemotherapy tumor volume and 63.9Gy (2.13Gy/fraction) for the post-chemotherapy volume. Dose constraints for organs-at-risk and target coverage were provided. All treatment plans for photons and protons were collected, analyzed for minor and major deviations and compared using 21 dosimetric criteria.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Eleven French centers participated, submitting 14 plans (10 photon/4 proton plans). One photon plan showed a minor deviation in CTV coverage (V60.7GyCTV=98.8%, expected value=100%), and another one exhibited two minor deviations in organ-at-risk constraints (V55GyBowel=32cc [limit:28 cc] and V50GyRectum=52.4% [limit:50%]). No significant difference was observed between photons and protons in target coverage for PTV63.9Gy(p=0.95) and CTV63.9Gy(p=0.66), as well as in sparing the most critical organs. However, significant differences were reported in favor of protons regarding the integral dose criterion (p&lt;0.01), DmeanBowel(9.9±1.1Gy for photons vs 4.1±1.3 Gy for protons, p&lt;0.01), and DmeanAnalCanal(3.9±0.7Gy for photons vs 2.2±0.9Gy for protons, p&lt;0.01).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This national training initiative provided French centers conducting pediatric radio/proton-therapy with an initial insight into the Ewing-1 protocol. Analysis showed a good treatment planning homogeneity between the centers and a successful adhesion to the dose escalation arm constraints. Protons did not demonstrate considerable advantages for this particular clinical case except with respect to the limitation of integral dose.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14215,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics\",\"volume\":\"121 3\",\"pages\":\"Page e4\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360301624035946\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360301624035946","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:interwing -1试验研究最终放疗的剂量递增(随机化54Gy vs . 64.8Gy)。在试验开始之前,法国儿童放疗组(GFRP)开展了一项国家培训计划,以评估随剂量递增的最终放射治疗的剂量学差异。方法与材料选择1例未经手术治疗的大骨盆儿童尤文氏肉瘤。与ct扫描相关的描绘结构被分发给所有被认可的儿童放射和/或质子治疗的参与者。治疗计划包括同时综合增强:化疗前肿瘤体积分为30个部分54Gy (1.80Gy/部分),化疗后肿瘤体积为63.9Gy (2.13Gy/部分)。提供了危险器官和目标覆盖的剂量限制。收集所有光子和质子的治疗方案,分析轻微和主要偏差,并使用21个剂量学标准进行比较。结果6个法国中心参与,提交了14个方案(10个光子/4个质子方案)。一个光子计划在CTV覆盖范围上显示了较小的偏差(V60.7GyCTV=98.8%,预期值=100%),另一个光子计划在器官危险限制上显示了两个较小的偏差(V55GyBowel=32cc [limit: 28cc]和V50GyRectum=52.4% [limit:50%])。光子和质子在PTV63.9Gy(p=0.95)和CTV63.9Gy(p=0.66)的靶覆盖范围以及保留最关键器官方面没有显著差异。然而,在积分剂量标准(p<0.01)、DmeanBowel(光子9.9±1.1Gy vs质子4.1±1.3 Gy, p<0.01)和DmeanAnalCanal(光子3.9±0.7Gy vs质子2.2±0.9Gy, p<0.01)方面,均有显著差异。这项国家培训计划为法国开展儿科放射/质子治疗的中心提供了对Ewing-1方案的初步了解。分析显示各中心间治疗计划均质性良好,并成功遵守剂量递增臂的限制。除了整体剂量的限制外,质子在这个特殊的临床病例中没有显示出相当大的优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Dose Escalation in Pediatric Pelvic Ewing's Sarcoma: Insights from a National Training Initiative

Objective

The Inter Ewing-1 trial investigates dose escalation in definitive radiotherapy (randomization 54Gy versus 64.8Gy). Before opening the trial, a national training initiative was conducted by the French Pediatric Radiotherapy Group (GFRP) to assess dosimetric discrepancies in definitive RT with dose escalation.

Methods and Materials

A large non-operated pelvic pediatric case of Ewing's sarcoma was selected. Delineated structures associated with CT-scan were distributed to participants, all of whom were accredited for pediatric radio- and/or proton-therapy. Treatment planning involved a simultaneous integrated boost: 54Gy in 30 fractions (1.80Gy/fraction) for the pre-chemotherapy tumor volume and 63.9Gy (2.13Gy/fraction) for the post-chemotherapy volume. Dose constraints for organs-at-risk and target coverage were provided. All treatment plans for photons and protons were collected, analyzed for minor and major deviations and compared using 21 dosimetric criteria.

Results

Eleven French centers participated, submitting 14 plans (10 photon/4 proton plans). One photon plan showed a minor deviation in CTV coverage (V60.7GyCTV=98.8%, expected value=100%), and another one exhibited two minor deviations in organ-at-risk constraints (V55GyBowel=32cc [limit:28 cc] and V50GyRectum=52.4% [limit:50%]). No significant difference was observed between photons and protons in target coverage for PTV63.9Gy(p=0.95) and CTV63.9Gy(p=0.66), as well as in sparing the most critical organs. However, significant differences were reported in favor of protons regarding the integral dose criterion (p<0.01), DmeanBowel(9.9±1.1Gy for photons vs 4.1±1.3 Gy for protons, p<0.01), and DmeanAnalCanal(3.9±0.7Gy for photons vs 2.2±0.9Gy for protons, p<0.01).

Conclusion

This national training initiative provided French centers conducting pediatric radio/proton-therapy with an initial insight into the Ewing-1 protocol. Analysis showed a good treatment planning homogeneity between the centers and a successful adhesion to the dose escalation arm constraints. Protons did not demonstrate considerable advantages for this particular clinical case except with respect to the limitation of integral dose.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
7.10%
发文量
2538
审稿时长
6.6 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Radiation Oncology • Biology • Physics (IJROBP), known in the field as the Red Journal, publishes original laboratory and clinical investigations related to radiation oncology, radiation biology, medical physics, and both education and health policy as it relates to the field. This journal has a particular interest in original contributions of the following types: prospective clinical trials, outcomes research, and large database interrogation. In addition, it seeks reports of high-impact innovations in single or combined modality treatment, tumor sensitization, normal tissue protection (including both precision avoidance and pharmacologic means), brachytherapy, particle irradiation, and cancer imaging. Technical advances related to dosimetry and conformal radiation treatment planning are of interest, as are basic science studies investigating tumor physiology and the molecular biology underlying cancer and normal tissue radiation response.
期刊最新文献
The Critical Role of Dose Homogeneity in Modern Breast Hypofractionation Radiation Dose and Lymphedema Risk After Immediate Lymphatic Reconstruction and Axillary Lymph Node Dissection Geographic and Sociodemographic Disparities in Access to Radiation Therapy in Brazil: A Nationwide Cross-Sectional Study (2017-2022) In Reply to Acharya Cancer as a Chronic Disease and the Role of Reirradiation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1