{"title":"印度梅加拉亚邦滑坡易感性制图的地理空间评价和综合多模型方法","authors":"Naveen Badavath, Smrutirekha Sahoo","doi":"10.1016/j.asr.2024.11.052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Landslides in Meghalaya, India, inflict severe property and life damage due to mountains, steep slopes, and heavy rains. Landslide Susceptibility (LS) maps are extremely useful for disaster management. The primary goal of this work is to generate an LS map for the state of Meghalaya. In the first phase, a Landslide Inventory (LI) map was created, which included 855 landslides that occurred from 2019 to 2023. The LI map was then split into 70 % (601) and 30 % (254) for training and testing, respectively. In the second phase, the study selected fourteen conditioning factors as thematic layers for LS mapping and performed multicollinearity and Pearson’s correlation analysis; all the parameters were identified as optimal for the prediction model. Eight different scenario models (Frequency Ratio (FR), Evidence Belief Function (EBF), FR + EBF, FR*EBF, (FR*EBF)/2, (2*FR) + EBF, (2*EBF) + FR and (EBF + FR)/3) have been used to generate LS maps. The created maps were validated using Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) curve and the corresponding Area Under the Curve (AUC) value, statistical measures (recall, precision, F1 score, overall accuracy, and balanced accuracy) and on-site verification with recent landslides. Finally, the result of the best scenario was compared with the outcome of the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method. Results showed that scenario 4 (EBF*FR) has an overall accuracy of 82.3 %, whereas AHP has an overall accuracy of 77.6 %. It is indicated that scenario 4 achieved 4.7 % higher overall accuracy than that of the AHP method. Recent landslides selected for on-site verification occurred in an area classified as very highly susceptible by the scenario 4 model. These maps provide vital conceptions of landslide mechanisms, assisting land use planning and disaster management. This approach can be applied in similar areas by investigators, which indicates the originality of the study, and the result of this study will be beneficial for the Meghalaya region.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50850,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Space Research","volume":"75 3","pages":"Pages 2764-2791"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Geospatial assessment and integrated multi-model approach for landslide susceptibility mapping in Meghalaya, India\",\"authors\":\"Naveen Badavath, Smrutirekha Sahoo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.asr.2024.11.052\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Landslides in Meghalaya, India, inflict severe property and life damage due to mountains, steep slopes, and heavy rains. Landslide Susceptibility (LS) maps are extremely useful for disaster management. The primary goal of this work is to generate an LS map for the state of Meghalaya. In the first phase, a Landslide Inventory (LI) map was created, which included 855 landslides that occurred from 2019 to 2023. The LI map was then split into 70 % (601) and 30 % (254) for training and testing, respectively. In the second phase, the study selected fourteen conditioning factors as thematic layers for LS mapping and performed multicollinearity and Pearson’s correlation analysis; all the parameters were identified as optimal for the prediction model. Eight different scenario models (Frequency Ratio (FR), Evidence Belief Function (EBF), FR + EBF, FR*EBF, (FR*EBF)/2, (2*FR) + EBF, (2*EBF) + FR and (EBF + FR)/3) have been used to generate LS maps. The created maps were validated using Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) curve and the corresponding Area Under the Curve (AUC) value, statistical measures (recall, precision, F1 score, overall accuracy, and balanced accuracy) and on-site verification with recent landslides. Finally, the result of the best scenario was compared with the outcome of the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method. Results showed that scenario 4 (EBF*FR) has an overall accuracy of 82.3 %, whereas AHP has an overall accuracy of 77.6 %. It is indicated that scenario 4 achieved 4.7 % higher overall accuracy than that of the AHP method. Recent landslides selected for on-site verification occurred in an area classified as very highly susceptible by the scenario 4 model. These maps provide vital conceptions of landslide mechanisms, assisting land use planning and disaster management. This approach can be applied in similar areas by investigators, which indicates the originality of the study, and the result of this study will be beneficial for the Meghalaya region.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50850,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Space Research\",\"volume\":\"75 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 2764-2791\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Space Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0273117724011748\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/24 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Space Research","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0273117724011748","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Geospatial assessment and integrated multi-model approach for landslide susceptibility mapping in Meghalaya, India
Landslides in Meghalaya, India, inflict severe property and life damage due to mountains, steep slopes, and heavy rains. Landslide Susceptibility (LS) maps are extremely useful for disaster management. The primary goal of this work is to generate an LS map for the state of Meghalaya. In the first phase, a Landslide Inventory (LI) map was created, which included 855 landslides that occurred from 2019 to 2023. The LI map was then split into 70 % (601) and 30 % (254) for training and testing, respectively. In the second phase, the study selected fourteen conditioning factors as thematic layers for LS mapping and performed multicollinearity and Pearson’s correlation analysis; all the parameters were identified as optimal for the prediction model. Eight different scenario models (Frequency Ratio (FR), Evidence Belief Function (EBF), FR + EBF, FR*EBF, (FR*EBF)/2, (2*FR) + EBF, (2*EBF) + FR and (EBF + FR)/3) have been used to generate LS maps. The created maps were validated using Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) curve and the corresponding Area Under the Curve (AUC) value, statistical measures (recall, precision, F1 score, overall accuracy, and balanced accuracy) and on-site verification with recent landslides. Finally, the result of the best scenario was compared with the outcome of the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method. Results showed that scenario 4 (EBF*FR) has an overall accuracy of 82.3 %, whereas AHP has an overall accuracy of 77.6 %. It is indicated that scenario 4 achieved 4.7 % higher overall accuracy than that of the AHP method. Recent landslides selected for on-site verification occurred in an area classified as very highly susceptible by the scenario 4 model. These maps provide vital conceptions of landslide mechanisms, assisting land use planning and disaster management. This approach can be applied in similar areas by investigators, which indicates the originality of the study, and the result of this study will be beneficial for the Meghalaya region.
期刊介绍:
The COSPAR publication Advances in Space Research (ASR) is an open journal covering all areas of space research including: space studies of the Earth''s surface, meteorology, climate, the Earth-Moon system, planets and small bodies of the solar system, upper atmospheres, ionospheres and magnetospheres of the Earth and planets including reference atmospheres, space plasmas in the solar system, astrophysics from space, materials sciences in space, fundamental physics in space, space debris, space weather, Earth observations of space phenomena, etc.
NB: Please note that manuscripts related to life sciences as related to space are no more accepted for submission to Advances in Space Research. Such manuscripts should now be submitted to the new COSPAR Journal Life Sciences in Space Research (LSSR).
All submissions are reviewed by two scientists in the field. COSPAR is an interdisciplinary scientific organization concerned with the progress of space research on an international scale. Operating under the rules of ICSU, COSPAR ignores political considerations and considers all questions solely from the scientific viewpoint.