印度梅加拉亚邦滑坡易感性制图的地理空间评价和综合多模型方法

IF 3.2 3区 地球科学 Q2 ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS Advances in Space Research Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-24 DOI:10.1016/j.asr.2024.11.052
Naveen Badavath, Smrutirekha Sahoo
{"title":"印度梅加拉亚邦滑坡易感性制图的地理空间评价和综合多模型方法","authors":"Naveen Badavath,&nbsp;Smrutirekha Sahoo","doi":"10.1016/j.asr.2024.11.052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Landslides in Meghalaya, India, inflict severe property and life damage due to mountains, steep slopes, and heavy rains. Landslide Susceptibility (LS) maps are extremely useful for disaster management. The primary goal of this work is to generate an LS map for the state of Meghalaya. In the first phase, a Landslide Inventory (LI) map was created, which included 855 landslides that occurred from 2019 to 2023. The LI map was then split into 70 % (601) and 30 % (254) for training and testing, respectively. In the second phase, the study selected fourteen conditioning factors as thematic layers for LS mapping and performed multicollinearity and Pearson’s correlation analysis; all the parameters were identified as optimal for the prediction model. Eight different scenario models (Frequency Ratio (FR), Evidence Belief Function (EBF), FR + EBF, FR*EBF, (FR*EBF)/2, (2*FR) + EBF, (2*EBF) + FR and (EBF + FR)/3) have been used to generate LS maps. The created maps were validated using Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) curve and the corresponding Area Under the Curve (AUC) value, statistical measures (recall, precision, F1 score, overall accuracy, and balanced accuracy) and on-site verification with recent landslides. Finally, the result of the best scenario was compared with the outcome of the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method. Results showed that scenario 4 (EBF*FR) has an overall accuracy of 82.3 %, whereas AHP has an overall accuracy of 77.6 %. It is indicated that scenario 4 achieved 4.7 % higher overall accuracy than that of the AHP method. Recent landslides selected for on-site verification occurred in an area classified as very highly susceptible by the scenario 4 model. These maps provide vital conceptions of landslide mechanisms, assisting land use planning and disaster management. This approach can be applied in similar areas by investigators, which indicates the originality of the study, and the result of this study will be beneficial for the Meghalaya region.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50850,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Space Research","volume":"75 3","pages":"Pages 2764-2791"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Geospatial assessment and integrated multi-model approach for landslide susceptibility mapping in Meghalaya, India\",\"authors\":\"Naveen Badavath,&nbsp;Smrutirekha Sahoo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.asr.2024.11.052\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Landslides in Meghalaya, India, inflict severe property and life damage due to mountains, steep slopes, and heavy rains. Landslide Susceptibility (LS) maps are extremely useful for disaster management. The primary goal of this work is to generate an LS map for the state of Meghalaya. In the first phase, a Landslide Inventory (LI) map was created, which included 855 landslides that occurred from 2019 to 2023. The LI map was then split into 70 % (601) and 30 % (254) for training and testing, respectively. In the second phase, the study selected fourteen conditioning factors as thematic layers for LS mapping and performed multicollinearity and Pearson’s correlation analysis; all the parameters were identified as optimal for the prediction model. Eight different scenario models (Frequency Ratio (FR), Evidence Belief Function (EBF), FR + EBF, FR*EBF, (FR*EBF)/2, (2*FR) + EBF, (2*EBF) + FR and (EBF + FR)/3) have been used to generate LS maps. The created maps were validated using Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) curve and the corresponding Area Under the Curve (AUC) value, statistical measures (recall, precision, F1 score, overall accuracy, and balanced accuracy) and on-site verification with recent landslides. Finally, the result of the best scenario was compared with the outcome of the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method. Results showed that scenario 4 (EBF*FR) has an overall accuracy of 82.3 %, whereas AHP has an overall accuracy of 77.6 %. It is indicated that scenario 4 achieved 4.7 % higher overall accuracy than that of the AHP method. Recent landslides selected for on-site verification occurred in an area classified as very highly susceptible by the scenario 4 model. These maps provide vital conceptions of landslide mechanisms, assisting land use planning and disaster management. This approach can be applied in similar areas by investigators, which indicates the originality of the study, and the result of this study will be beneficial for the Meghalaya region.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50850,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Space Research\",\"volume\":\"75 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 2764-2791\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Space Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0273117724011748\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/24 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Space Research","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0273117724011748","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

印度梅加拉亚邦发生山体滑坡,由于山脉、陡坡和暴雨,造成了严重的财产和生命损失。滑坡易感性(LS)地图对灾害管理非常有用。这项工作的主要目标是生成梅加拉亚邦的LS地图。在第一阶段,创建了滑坡清单(LI)地图,其中包括2019年至2023年发生的855次滑坡。然后,LI地图分别被分成70%(601)和30%(254)用于训练和测试。第二阶段,选取14个条件因子作为LS映射的主题层,进行多重共线性和Pearson相关分析;所有参数均为预测模型的最优参数。8种不同的情景模型(频率比(FR)、证据信念函数(EBF)、FR + EBF、FR*EBF、(FR*EBF)/2、(2*FR) + EBF、(2*EBF) + FR和(EBF + FR)/3)被用于生成LS地图。使用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线和相应的曲线下面积(AUC)值、统计指标(召回率、精度、F1评分、总体精度和平衡精度)以及最近山体滑坡的现场验证来验证所创建的地图。最后,将最佳方案的结果与层次分析法(AHP)的结果进行比较。结果表明,情景4 (EBF*FR)的总体准确率为82.3%,而AHP的总体准确率为77.6%。结果表明,情景4的总体准确率比AHP方法高4.7%。最近选择进行现场验证的滑坡发生在情景4模型列为非常高度易感的地区。这些地图提供了滑坡机制的重要概念,有助于土地利用规划和灾害管理。这种方法可以应用于类似领域的研究人员,这表明该研究的原创性,本研究的结果将有利于梅加拉亚邦地区。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Geospatial assessment and integrated multi-model approach for landslide susceptibility mapping in Meghalaya, India
Landslides in Meghalaya, India, inflict severe property and life damage due to mountains, steep slopes, and heavy rains. Landslide Susceptibility (LS) maps are extremely useful for disaster management. The primary goal of this work is to generate an LS map for the state of Meghalaya. In the first phase, a Landslide Inventory (LI) map was created, which included 855 landslides that occurred from 2019 to 2023. The LI map was then split into 70 % (601) and 30 % (254) for training and testing, respectively. In the second phase, the study selected fourteen conditioning factors as thematic layers for LS mapping and performed multicollinearity and Pearson’s correlation analysis; all the parameters were identified as optimal for the prediction model. Eight different scenario models (Frequency Ratio (FR), Evidence Belief Function (EBF), FR + EBF, FR*EBF, (FR*EBF)/2, (2*FR) + EBF, (2*EBF) + FR and (EBF + FR)/3) have been used to generate LS maps. The created maps were validated using Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) curve and the corresponding Area Under the Curve (AUC) value, statistical measures (recall, precision, F1 score, overall accuracy, and balanced accuracy) and on-site verification with recent landslides. Finally, the result of the best scenario was compared with the outcome of the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method. Results showed that scenario 4 (EBF*FR) has an overall accuracy of 82.3 %, whereas AHP has an overall accuracy of 77.6 %. It is indicated that scenario 4 achieved 4.7 % higher overall accuracy than that of the AHP method. Recent landslides selected for on-site verification occurred in an area classified as very highly susceptible by the scenario 4 model. These maps provide vital conceptions of landslide mechanisms, assisting land use planning and disaster management. This approach can be applied in similar areas by investigators, which indicates the originality of the study, and the result of this study will be beneficial for the Meghalaya region.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in Space Research
Advances in Space Research 地学天文-地球科学综合
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
11.50%
发文量
800
审稿时长
5.8 months
期刊介绍: The COSPAR publication Advances in Space Research (ASR) is an open journal covering all areas of space research including: space studies of the Earth''s surface, meteorology, climate, the Earth-Moon system, planets and small bodies of the solar system, upper atmospheres, ionospheres and magnetospheres of the Earth and planets including reference atmospheres, space plasmas in the solar system, astrophysics from space, materials sciences in space, fundamental physics in space, space debris, space weather, Earth observations of space phenomena, etc. NB: Please note that manuscripts related to life sciences as related to space are no more accepted for submission to Advances in Space Research. Such manuscripts should now be submitted to the new COSPAR Journal Life Sciences in Space Research (LSSR). All submissions are reviewed by two scientists in the field. COSPAR is an interdisciplinary scientific organization concerned with the progress of space research on an international scale. Operating under the rules of ICSU, COSPAR ignores political considerations and considers all questions solely from the scientific viewpoint.
期刊最新文献
High precision and high spatial-resolution daily fusion PWV dataset in China over the period 2019–2024 Integrating remote sensing, geophysical and geochemical approach for targeting intrusion-associated hydrothermal gold deposits: insights from Northeastern Desert in Egypt Design and analysis of controllable domain for point return orbits using velocity surfaces Influence of solar activity on the formation of sporadic-E layers over the Ouagadougou station, near the African geomagnetic equator A gravity-height fusion planning, control method based on deep reinforcement learning for small celestial body exploration robots
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1