一些引力理论中星系团的流体静力质量

IF 2.8 3区 物理与天体物理 Q2 PHYSICS, PARTICLES & FIELDS Nuclear Physics B Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-07 DOI:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2024.116790
Feri Apryandi , M. Lawrence Pattersons
{"title":"一些引力理论中星系团的流体静力质量","authors":"Feri Apryandi ,&nbsp;M. Lawrence Pattersons","doi":"10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2024.116790","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The mass of galaxy clusters (GCs) can be determined by calculating the hydrostatic equilibrium equation. In this work, we derive the hydrostatic mass of GCs within Eddington-inspired Born-Infeld (EiBI) theory, beyond Horndeski gravity (BHG), and modified emergent Newtonian gravity (MENG) with generalized uncertainty principle (GUP) correction. We apply the formulations on the masses of 10 GCs. We compare our results with the Newtonian mass of GCs. Within a regime, we get an insight that all formulations could match the Newtonian mass. Thus, the impact of the modified theories of gravity used in this work can be neglected in this regime. The noteworthy impact starts if we set <span><math><mi>κ</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>5</mn><mo>×</mo><msup><mrow><mn>10</mn></mrow><mrow><mn>40</mn></mrow></msup></math></span> m<sup>2</sup> for EiBI theory, <span><math><mi>ϒ</mi><mo>=</mo><mo>−</mo><mn>0.1655</mn><mo>×</mo><msup><mrow><mn>10</mn></mrow><mrow><mn>69</mn></mrow></msup></math></span> for BHG, and <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>β</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>0</mn></mrow></msub><mo>=</mo><mo>−</mo><mn>1.656</mn><mo>×</mo><msup><mrow><mn>10</mn></mrow><mrow><mn>110</mn></mrow></msup></math></span> for MENG. We also compare our results from EiBI theory and BHG with the baryonic masses <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>M</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>b</mi><mi>a</mi><mi>r</mi></mrow></msub></math></span> of the GCs. A better linear fit is achieved by EiBI theory with <span><math><mi>κ</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>5.80</mn><mo>×</mo><msup><mrow><mn>10</mn></mrow><mrow><mn>40</mn></mrow></msup></math></span> m<sup>2</sup>, which gives the slope <span><math><mi>M</mi></math></span> of <span><math><mn>0.126</mn><mo>±</mo><mn>0.086</mn></math></span>. This value is closer to unity than the one of BHG. This leads us to the fact that EiBI theory is more effective than BHG in alleviating the mass discrepancy between hydrostatic mass and baryonic mass in GCs. Nevertheless, neither EiBI theory nor BHG completely addresses the mass discrepancy problem.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54712,"journal":{"name":"Nuclear Physics B","volume":"1011 ","pages":"Article 116790"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hydrostatic mass of galaxy clusters within some theories of gravity\",\"authors\":\"Feri Apryandi ,&nbsp;M. Lawrence Pattersons\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2024.116790\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The mass of galaxy clusters (GCs) can be determined by calculating the hydrostatic equilibrium equation. In this work, we derive the hydrostatic mass of GCs within Eddington-inspired Born-Infeld (EiBI) theory, beyond Horndeski gravity (BHG), and modified emergent Newtonian gravity (MENG) with generalized uncertainty principle (GUP) correction. We apply the formulations on the masses of 10 GCs. We compare our results with the Newtonian mass of GCs. Within a regime, we get an insight that all formulations could match the Newtonian mass. Thus, the impact of the modified theories of gravity used in this work can be neglected in this regime. The noteworthy impact starts if we set <span><math><mi>κ</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>5</mn><mo>×</mo><msup><mrow><mn>10</mn></mrow><mrow><mn>40</mn></mrow></msup></math></span> m<sup>2</sup> for EiBI theory, <span><math><mi>ϒ</mi><mo>=</mo><mo>−</mo><mn>0.1655</mn><mo>×</mo><msup><mrow><mn>10</mn></mrow><mrow><mn>69</mn></mrow></msup></math></span> for BHG, and <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>β</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>0</mn></mrow></msub><mo>=</mo><mo>−</mo><mn>1.656</mn><mo>×</mo><msup><mrow><mn>10</mn></mrow><mrow><mn>110</mn></mrow></msup></math></span> for MENG. We also compare our results from EiBI theory and BHG with the baryonic masses <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>M</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>b</mi><mi>a</mi><mi>r</mi></mrow></msub></math></span> of the GCs. A better linear fit is achieved by EiBI theory with <span><math><mi>κ</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>5.80</mn><mo>×</mo><msup><mrow><mn>10</mn></mrow><mrow><mn>40</mn></mrow></msup></math></span> m<sup>2</sup>, which gives the slope <span><math><mi>M</mi></math></span> of <span><math><mn>0.126</mn><mo>±</mo><mn>0.086</mn></math></span>. This value is closer to unity than the one of BHG. This leads us to the fact that EiBI theory is more effective than BHG in alleviating the mass discrepancy between hydrostatic mass and baryonic mass in GCs. Nevertheless, neither EiBI theory nor BHG completely addresses the mass discrepancy problem.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54712,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nuclear Physics B\",\"volume\":\"1011 \",\"pages\":\"Article 116790\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nuclear Physics B\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"101\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0550321324003560\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"物理与天体物理\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHYSICS, PARTICLES & FIELDS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nuclear Physics B","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0550321324003560","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHYSICS, PARTICLES & FIELDS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

星系团的质量可以通过计算流体静力平衡方程来确定。在这项工作中,我们在Eddington-inspired Born-Infeld (EiBI)理论中推导出了GCs的流体静力质量,超越了Horndeski引力(BHG),并通过广义不确定性原理(GUP)修正了新兴牛顿引力(孟)。我们将公式应用于10个gc的质量。我们将我们的结果与gc的牛顿质量进行比较。在一个体系中,我们发现所有的公式都符合牛顿质量。因此,这项工作中使用的修正的引力理论的影响在这个制度中可以忽略不计。如果我们为EiBI理论设置κ=5×1040 m2,为BHG设置γ = - 0.1655×1069,为孟设置β0= - 1.656×10110,那么显著的影响就开始了。我们还将EiBI理论和BHG的结果与GCs的重子质量Mbar进行了比较。通过EiBI理论,κ=5.80×1040 m2得到了较好的线性拟合,斜率M为0.126±0.086。这个值比BHG的值更接近于1。这导致我们认为EiBI理论比BHG理论更有效地缓解了GCs中流体静力质量和重子质量之间的质量差异。然而,EiBI理论和BHG理论都没有完全解决质量差异问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Hydrostatic mass of galaxy clusters within some theories of gravity
The mass of galaxy clusters (GCs) can be determined by calculating the hydrostatic equilibrium equation. In this work, we derive the hydrostatic mass of GCs within Eddington-inspired Born-Infeld (EiBI) theory, beyond Horndeski gravity (BHG), and modified emergent Newtonian gravity (MENG) with generalized uncertainty principle (GUP) correction. We apply the formulations on the masses of 10 GCs. We compare our results with the Newtonian mass of GCs. Within a regime, we get an insight that all formulations could match the Newtonian mass. Thus, the impact of the modified theories of gravity used in this work can be neglected in this regime. The noteworthy impact starts if we set κ=5×1040 m2 for EiBI theory, ϒ=0.1655×1069 for BHG, and β0=1.656×10110 for MENG. We also compare our results from EiBI theory and BHG with the baryonic masses Mbar of the GCs. A better linear fit is achieved by EiBI theory with κ=5.80×1040 m2, which gives the slope M of 0.126±0.086. This value is closer to unity than the one of BHG. This leads us to the fact that EiBI theory is more effective than BHG in alleviating the mass discrepancy between hydrostatic mass and baryonic mass in GCs. Nevertheless, neither EiBI theory nor BHG completely addresses the mass discrepancy problem.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nuclear Physics B
Nuclear Physics B 物理-物理:粒子与场物理
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
302
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Nuclear Physics B focuses on the domain of high energy physics, quantum field theory, statistical systems, and mathematical physics, and includes four main sections: high energy physics - phenomenology, high energy physics - theory, high energy physics - experiment, and quantum field theory, statistical systems, and mathematical physics. The emphasis is on original research papers (Frontiers Articles or Full Length Articles), but Review Articles are also welcome.
期刊最新文献
Dynamical symmetries of the Calogero–Coulomb model W-mode oscillation of neutron star in a new relativistic hybrid model Thick oriented and nonoriented center-vortex SU(N) configurations with fractional topological charge lumps Localized helical spin texture in ferromagnetic thin films Quantum stability at one loop for BPS membranes in a Lorentz-covariant RVPD matrix model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1