深度森林对高速公路碰撞风险预测的详细危险驾驶行为数据的SHapley加性解释

IF 9 2区 计算机科学 Q1 AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-06 DOI:10.1016/j.engappai.2024.109787
Xiaochi Ma , Zongxin Huo , Jian Lu , Yiik Diew Wong
{"title":"深度森林对高速公路碰撞风险预测的详细危险驾驶行为数据的SHapley加性解释","authors":"Xiaochi Ma ,&nbsp;Zongxin Huo ,&nbsp;Jian Lu ,&nbsp;Yiik Diew Wong","doi":"10.1016/j.engappai.2024.109787","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Freeway crash risk prediction is a critical component of traffic safety management, yet existing crash risk models often fail to capture complex driving behaviors and lack interpretability. This study introduces a novel freeway crash risk prediction framework based on the Deep Forest (DF) algorithm, considering the detailed risky driving behavior data. The DF model integrates multi-grained scanning and cascade forest layers, enabling it to capture the complex relationship between risky driving behavior features. SHapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) are applied to interpret the model's predictions, including both SHAP summary and interaction results. Additionally, ablation studies are conducted to evaluate the contributions of key components like multi-grained scanning and cascade structures to the model's performance. The experimental results demonstrate that the DF model outperforms traditional machine learning models. The DF model achieves an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.825, with a balanced Sensitivity of 0.75 and Specificity of 0.816, surpassing other models. The ablation studies show that removing multi-grained scanning, cascade layers, or completely random tree forest leads to performance declines, confirming the importance of each component. The SHAP analysis highlights that sharp acceleration and braking behaviors have the most significant impact on crash risk, offering clear, interpretable insights into how driving behaviors contribute to risk. Overall, the DF model's superior performance and SHAP-based interpretability provide a powerful tool for traffic safety management. These findings emphasize the value of incorporating both driving behavior intensity and model interpretability into crash risk prediction, offering practical applications for reducing crash rates.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50523,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence","volume":"141 ","pages":"Article 109787"},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Deep Forest with SHapley additive explanations on detailed risky driving behavior data for freeway crash risk prediction\",\"authors\":\"Xiaochi Ma ,&nbsp;Zongxin Huo ,&nbsp;Jian Lu ,&nbsp;Yiik Diew Wong\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.engappai.2024.109787\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Freeway crash risk prediction is a critical component of traffic safety management, yet existing crash risk models often fail to capture complex driving behaviors and lack interpretability. This study introduces a novel freeway crash risk prediction framework based on the Deep Forest (DF) algorithm, considering the detailed risky driving behavior data. The DF model integrates multi-grained scanning and cascade forest layers, enabling it to capture the complex relationship between risky driving behavior features. SHapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) are applied to interpret the model's predictions, including both SHAP summary and interaction results. Additionally, ablation studies are conducted to evaluate the contributions of key components like multi-grained scanning and cascade structures to the model's performance. The experimental results demonstrate that the DF model outperforms traditional machine learning models. The DF model achieves an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.825, with a balanced Sensitivity of 0.75 and Specificity of 0.816, surpassing other models. The ablation studies show that removing multi-grained scanning, cascade layers, or completely random tree forest leads to performance declines, confirming the importance of each component. The SHAP analysis highlights that sharp acceleration and braking behaviors have the most significant impact on crash risk, offering clear, interpretable insights into how driving behaviors contribute to risk. Overall, the DF model's superior performance and SHAP-based interpretability provide a powerful tool for traffic safety management. These findings emphasize the value of incorporating both driving behavior intensity and model interpretability into crash risk prediction, offering practical applications for reducing crash rates.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50523,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence\",\"volume\":\"141 \",\"pages\":\"Article 109787\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0952197624019468\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0952197624019468","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

高速公路碰撞风险预测是交通安全管理的重要组成部分,但现有的碰撞风险模型往往无法捕捉复杂的驾驶行为,且缺乏可解释性。本文提出了一种基于深度森林(Deep Forest, DF)算法的高速公路碰撞风险预测框架,并考虑了详细的危险驾驶行为数据。DF模型集成了多粒度扫描和级联森林层,能够捕捉危险驾驶行为特征之间的复杂关系。SHapley加性解释(SHAP)用于解释模型的预测,包括SHapley加性解释总结和相互作用结果。此外,还进行了烧蚀研究,以评估多粒度扫描和级联结构等关键部件对模型性能的贡献。实验结果表明,DF模型优于传统的机器学习模型。DF模型的受者工作特征曲线下面积为0.825,灵敏度为0.75,特异性为0.816,优于其他模型。消融研究表明,去除多粒度扫描、级联层或完全随机的树木森林会导致性能下降,这证实了每个组件的重要性。SHAP分析强调,急剧加速和制动行为对碰撞风险的影响最大,为驾驶行为如何导致风险提供了清晰、可解释的见解。总体而言,DF模型的优越性能和基于shap的可解释性为交通安全管理提供了一个强大的工具。这些发现强调了将驾驶行为强度和模型可解释性结合到碰撞风险预测中的价值,为降低碰撞率提供了实际应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Deep Forest with SHapley additive explanations on detailed risky driving behavior data for freeway crash risk prediction
Freeway crash risk prediction is a critical component of traffic safety management, yet existing crash risk models often fail to capture complex driving behaviors and lack interpretability. This study introduces a novel freeway crash risk prediction framework based on the Deep Forest (DF) algorithm, considering the detailed risky driving behavior data. The DF model integrates multi-grained scanning and cascade forest layers, enabling it to capture the complex relationship between risky driving behavior features. SHapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) are applied to interpret the model's predictions, including both SHAP summary and interaction results. Additionally, ablation studies are conducted to evaluate the contributions of key components like multi-grained scanning and cascade structures to the model's performance. The experimental results demonstrate that the DF model outperforms traditional machine learning models. The DF model achieves an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.825, with a balanced Sensitivity of 0.75 and Specificity of 0.816, surpassing other models. The ablation studies show that removing multi-grained scanning, cascade layers, or completely random tree forest leads to performance declines, confirming the importance of each component. The SHAP analysis highlights that sharp acceleration and braking behaviors have the most significant impact on crash risk, offering clear, interpretable insights into how driving behaviors contribute to risk. Overall, the DF model's superior performance and SHAP-based interpretability provide a powerful tool for traffic safety management. These findings emphasize the value of incorporating both driving behavior intensity and model interpretability into crash risk prediction, offering practical applications for reducing crash rates.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence
Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 工程技术-工程:电子与电气
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
505
审稿时长
68 days
期刊介绍: Artificial Intelligence (AI) is pivotal in driving the fourth industrial revolution, witnessing remarkable advancements across various machine learning methodologies. AI techniques have become indispensable tools for practicing engineers, enabling them to tackle previously insurmountable challenges. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence serves as a global platform for the swift dissemination of research elucidating the practical application of AI methods across all engineering disciplines. Submitted papers are expected to present novel aspects of AI utilized in real-world engineering applications, validated using publicly available datasets to ensure the replicability of research outcomes. Join us in exploring the transformative potential of AI in engineering.
期刊最新文献
A visionary dual-scale hybrid network for abdominal multi-organ segmentation Hierarchical multi-policy adversarial reinforcement learning A unified causality-enhanced separable physics-informed neural network for predicting beam and plate dynamics Network intrusion detection with edge-directed graph Multi-Head Attention Networks State of health estimation and remaining useful life prediction of Li-ion battery oriented to real-world electric vehicles: A comprehensive evaluation methodology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1