IF 5.4 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Environmental and Sustainability Indicators Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.indic.2025.100583
Adila Ainiwaerjiang , Xueying Jin , Zhen Xie , Tian Tian , Yuxuan Dang
{"title":"Research on the multi-agent motivation coupling evolution and synergy improvement for farmland ecological protection in China","authors":"Adila Ainiwaerjiang ,&nbsp;Xueying Jin ,&nbsp;Zhen Xie ,&nbsp;Tian Tian ,&nbsp;Yuxuan Dang","doi":"10.1016/j.indic.2025.100583","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The global ecology movement of the 1960s gave rise to international efforts to of farmland ecological protection. In these systematic, multi-agent projects, the long-term viability of farmland ecological protection rests significantly upon the alignment and synergistic interaction of the primary agents involved. Beginning in 2017, the Chinese government prioritized farmland ecological protection, instituting a collaborative governance structure involving policymakers, policy implementers, and agricultural producers. To appraise the characteristics of this structure, this study develops a multi-agent theoretical framework according to a “motivation-behavior” model for farmland ecological protection. Analyzing the motivations of these agents and the resultant synergy across the 2000–2020 period, this research indicates a significant rise in the motivation of Chinese policymakers toward farmland ecological protection, coupled with a significant decline in motivation among agricultural producers. Policy implementers’ motivation, however, has remained consistent. Employing a coupling and coordination model to assess the collaborative effectiveness among these actors, this study identifies a downward trend in synergistic effectiveness across three phases: primary coupling, approaching decoupling, and mild decoupling. To further explore the collaborative effectiveness of policy implementers and agricultural producers, a Tapio decoupling model is utilized to analyze changes in their synergistic activity. The temporal analysis of motivational shifts indicates a stabilizing trend among policy implementers and fluctuating efforts from agricultural producers. Spatially, high-value areas for policy implementers have experienced a significant decline, migrating from the left to the right of the Hu Line; whereas, high-value areas for agricultural producers have steadily decreased. Specifically, areas where synergistic efforts between implementers and producers in farmland ecological protection are being observed have expanded, while areas exhibiting decaying synergy have contracted. Areas initially indicating synergy decay demonstrate an initial increase followed by a decrease. This study concludes that China must develop a compensation structure for farmland ecological protection targeted at business actors, execute region-specific protection plans, and strengthen multi-agent motivation to cultivate more robust synergistic outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36171,"journal":{"name":"Environmental and Sustainability Indicators","volume":"25 ","pages":"Article 100583"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental and Sustainability Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665972725000042","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

20 世纪 60 年代的全球生态运动催生了农田生态保护的国际努力。在这些系统的、多主体的项目中,农田生态保护的长期可行性在很大程度上取决于参与其中的主要主体之间的协调和协同互动。从 2017 年开始,中国政府将耕地生态保护放在优先位置,建立了由政策制定者、政策执行者和农业生产者共同参与的协同治理结构。为了评估这一结构的特点,本研究根据农田生态保护的 "动机-行为 "模型,建立了一个多主体理论框架。通过分析 2000-2020 年间这些主体的动机及其协同作用,本研究表明中国政策制定者的耕地生态保护动机显著上升,而农业生产者的动机显著下降。然而,政策执行者的动机却保持一致。本研究采用耦合与协调模型来评估这些行动者之间的协作效果,发现在三个阶段中,协同效果呈下降趋势:初级耦合、接近脱钩和轻度脱钩。为了进一步探讨政策执行者和农业生产者的协作效率,本研究利用塔皮奥脱钩模型分析了他们协同活动的变化。对动机转变的时间分析表明,政策实施者的努力呈稳定趋势,而农业生产者的努力则起伏不定。从空间上看,政策执行者的高价值区域出现了显著下降,从胡线的左侧向右侧迁移;而农业生产者的高价值区域则稳步下降。具体而言,政策执行者与农业生产者在农田生态保护方面协同努力的区域有所扩大,而协同作用衰减的区域则有所收缩。最初显示协同作用衰减的地区在最初增加后又有所减少。本研究的结论是,中国必须制定针对企业行为者的耕地生态保护补偿结构,执行特定区域的保护计划,并加强多主体激励,以培育更强大的协同成果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Research on the multi-agent motivation coupling evolution and synergy improvement for farmland ecological protection in China
The global ecology movement of the 1960s gave rise to international efforts to of farmland ecological protection. In these systematic, multi-agent projects, the long-term viability of farmland ecological protection rests significantly upon the alignment and synergistic interaction of the primary agents involved. Beginning in 2017, the Chinese government prioritized farmland ecological protection, instituting a collaborative governance structure involving policymakers, policy implementers, and agricultural producers. To appraise the characteristics of this structure, this study develops a multi-agent theoretical framework according to a “motivation-behavior” model for farmland ecological protection. Analyzing the motivations of these agents and the resultant synergy across the 2000–2020 period, this research indicates a significant rise in the motivation of Chinese policymakers toward farmland ecological protection, coupled with a significant decline in motivation among agricultural producers. Policy implementers’ motivation, however, has remained consistent. Employing a coupling and coordination model to assess the collaborative effectiveness among these actors, this study identifies a downward trend in synergistic effectiveness across three phases: primary coupling, approaching decoupling, and mild decoupling. To further explore the collaborative effectiveness of policy implementers and agricultural producers, a Tapio decoupling model is utilized to analyze changes in their synergistic activity. The temporal analysis of motivational shifts indicates a stabilizing trend among policy implementers and fluctuating efforts from agricultural producers. Spatially, high-value areas for policy implementers have experienced a significant decline, migrating from the left to the right of the Hu Line; whereas, high-value areas for agricultural producers have steadily decreased. Specifically, areas where synergistic efforts between implementers and producers in farmland ecological protection are being observed have expanded, while areas exhibiting decaying synergy have contracted. Areas initially indicating synergy decay demonstrate an initial increase followed by a decrease. This study concludes that China must develop a compensation structure for farmland ecological protection targeted at business actors, execute region-specific protection plans, and strengthen multi-agent motivation to cultivate more robust synergistic outcomes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental and Sustainability Indicators
Environmental and Sustainability Indicators Environmental Science-Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
2.30%
发文量
49
审稿时长
57 days
期刊最新文献
Soil quality dynamics in response to land-use management types and slope positions in northeastern highlands of Ethiopia Understanding flood and drought extremes under a changing climate in the Blue Nile Basin: A review Determinants of carbon dioxide emissions in technology revolution 5.0: New insights in Vietnam The carbon footprint of football fans: Emotional and rational correlates of home and away game travel Fisheries performance indicators for assessing the ecological sustainability of wild-caught seafood products in Europe
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1