Yufei Qiu , Man Wu , Jiali Liu , Chaoyang Li , Yiqing Yu , Lijuan Zeng , Fen Yang , Xiaohong Zhang , Gang Chen
{"title":"基于信息技术的认知行为疗法对老年人抑郁和焦虑症状的疗效:系统回顾和荟萃分析","authors":"Yufei Qiu , Man Wu , Jiali Liu , Chaoyang Li , Yiqing Yu , Lijuan Zeng , Fen Yang , Xiaohong Zhang , Gang Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2024.12.022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Depression and anxiety are prevalent among older adults. However, most older adults have poor access to age-specific mental health services. While Information technology-based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (ICBT) has shown promise as an accessible alternative to face-to-face interventions, its effectiveness specifically within the older adults warrants further investigation.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To evaluate the effectiveness of ICBT on depression and anxiety symptoms among older adults.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Research articles retrieved from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, PsycINFO, and MEDLINE from inception to April 10, 2024, were reviewed. The search was designed to identify Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) that examined the efficacy of ICBT in reducing self-reported depression or anxiety symptoms in older adults. The quality of included studies was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials, version 2.0. Posttreatment means and standard deviations (SDs) were compared between intervention and control groups, and pooled effect sizes (Hedges' g) were calculated.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 11 RCTs were eligible for inclusion in this review. Compared to control groups, ICBT yielded small to medium post-treatment pooled effect sizes regarding depressive symptoms (Hedges' g = −0.65, 95 % CI −0.95 to −0.35; <em>P</em> < 0.001) and anxiety symptoms (Hedges' g = −0.47, 95 % CI −0.74 to −0.19; <em>P</em> < 0.001). Subgroup analyses showed that: (1) interventions lasting ≥8 weeks (Hedges' g = −0.88, 95 % CI −1.37 to −0.39; <em>P</em> < 0.001) were more effective than <8 weeks for depressive symptoms; however, <8 weeks (Hedges' g = −0.52, 95 % CI −0.93 to −0.10; <em>P =</em> 0.014) was more effective for anxiety symptoms; (2) ICBT delivered through slideshows was more effective than through other digital platforms for both depressive (Hedges' g = −1.36, 95 % CI −2.40 to −0.31; <em>P</em> = 0.011) and anxiety symptoms (Hedges' g = −1.00, 95 % CI −1.30 to −0.70; <em>P</em> <em><</em> 0.001); and (3) non-tailored ICBT was more effective than tailored versions for both depressive (Hedges' g = −1.06, 95 % CI −2.03 to −0.09; <em>P =</em> 0.032) and anxiety symptoms (Hedges' g = −0.70, 95 % CI −1.14 to −0.27; <em>P</em> = 0.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This meta-analysis reinforces the effectiveness of ICBT in relieving depression and anxiety symptoms among older adults. Future research should identify the most effective components of ICBT to optimize their development.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12517,"journal":{"name":"General hospital psychiatry","volume":"93 ","pages":"Pages 9-19"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of information technology-based cognitive behavioral therapy on depression and anxiety symptoms among older adults: Systematic review and meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Yufei Qiu , Man Wu , Jiali Liu , Chaoyang Li , Yiqing Yu , Lijuan Zeng , Fen Yang , Xiaohong Zhang , Gang Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2024.12.022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Depression and anxiety are prevalent among older adults. However, most older adults have poor access to age-specific mental health services. While Information technology-based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (ICBT) has shown promise as an accessible alternative to face-to-face interventions, its effectiveness specifically within the older adults warrants further investigation.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To evaluate the effectiveness of ICBT on depression and anxiety symptoms among older adults.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Research articles retrieved from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, PsycINFO, and MEDLINE from inception to April 10, 2024, were reviewed. The search was designed to identify Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) that examined the efficacy of ICBT in reducing self-reported depression or anxiety symptoms in older adults. The quality of included studies was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials, version 2.0. Posttreatment means and standard deviations (SDs) were compared between intervention and control groups, and pooled effect sizes (Hedges' g) were calculated.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 11 RCTs were eligible for inclusion in this review. Compared to control groups, ICBT yielded small to medium post-treatment pooled effect sizes regarding depressive symptoms (Hedges' g = −0.65, 95 % CI −0.95 to −0.35; <em>P</em> < 0.001) and anxiety symptoms (Hedges' g = −0.47, 95 % CI −0.74 to −0.19; <em>P</em> < 0.001). Subgroup analyses showed that: (1) interventions lasting ≥8 weeks (Hedges' g = −0.88, 95 % CI −1.37 to −0.39; <em>P</em> < 0.001) were more effective than <8 weeks for depressive symptoms; however, <8 weeks (Hedges' g = −0.52, 95 % CI −0.93 to −0.10; <em>P =</em> 0.014) was more effective for anxiety symptoms; (2) ICBT delivered through slideshows was more effective than through other digital platforms for both depressive (Hedges' g = −1.36, 95 % CI −2.40 to −0.31; <em>P</em> = 0.011) and anxiety symptoms (Hedges' g = −1.00, 95 % CI −1.30 to −0.70; <em>P</em> <em><</em> 0.001); and (3) non-tailored ICBT was more effective than tailored versions for both depressive (Hedges' g = −1.06, 95 % CI −2.03 to −0.09; <em>P =</em> 0.032) and anxiety symptoms (Hedges' g = −0.70, 95 % CI −1.14 to −0.27; <em>P</em> = 0.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This meta-analysis reinforces the effectiveness of ICBT in relieving depression and anxiety symptoms among older adults. Future research should identify the most effective components of ICBT to optimize their development.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12517,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"General hospital psychiatry\",\"volume\":\"93 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 9-19\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"General hospital psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0163834324002676\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"General hospital psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0163834324002676","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:抑郁和焦虑在老年人中很普遍。然而,大多数老年人很难获得针对其年龄的心理健康服务。虽然基于信息技术的认知行为疗法(ICBT)已经显示出作为面对面干预的一种可访问的替代方案的希望,但其在老年人中的有效性值得进一步研究。目的评价ICBT对老年人抑郁、焦虑症状的治疗效果。方法对从PubMed、EMBASE、Cochrane Library、Web of Science、PsycINFO、MEDLINE等数据库中检索到的从建站到2024年4月10日的研究文章进行分析。该研究旨在确定随机对照试验(RCTs),以检验ICBT在减少老年人自我报告的抑郁或焦虑症状方面的功效。纳入研究的质量采用Cochrane随机试验风险偏倚工具2.0版进行评估。比较干预组和对照组的治疗后均值和标准差(sd),并计算合并效应量(Hedges’g)。结果共有11项rct符合纳入本综述的条件。与对照组相比,ICBT对抑郁症状产生了小到中等的治疗后综合效应(Hedges’g = - 0.65, 95% CI - 0.95至- 0.35;P & lt;0.001)和焦虑症状(Hedges' g = - 0.47, 95% CI - 0.74至- 0.19;P & lt;0.001)。亚组分析显示:(1)干预持续≥8周(Hedges’g = - 0.88, 95% CI = - 1.37 ~ - 0.39);P & lt;0.001)治疗抑郁症状的效果优于8周治疗;然而,<;8周(对冲系数g = - 0.52, 95% CI - 0.93至- 0.10;P = 0.014)对焦虑症状更有效;(2)通过幻灯片提供的ICBT比通过其他数字平台对两种抑郁症更有效(赫奇斯的g = - 1.36, 95% CI为- 2.40至- 0.31;P = 0.011)和焦虑症状(Hedges' g = - 1.00, 95% CI = - 1.30 ~ - 0.70;P & lt;0.001);(3)对于两种抑郁症,非定制ICBT比定制ICBT更有效(Hedges' g = - 1.06, 95% CI为- 2.03至- 0.09;P = 0.032)和焦虑症状(Hedges' g = - 0.70, 95% CI = - 1.14至- 0.27;p = 0.001)。结论:本荟萃分析强化了ICBT在缓解老年人抑郁和焦虑症状方面的有效性。未来的研究应确定ICBT最有效的组成部分,以优化其发展。
Effectiveness of information technology-based cognitive behavioral therapy on depression and anxiety symptoms among older adults: Systematic review and meta-analysis
Background
Depression and anxiety are prevalent among older adults. However, most older adults have poor access to age-specific mental health services. While Information technology-based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (ICBT) has shown promise as an accessible alternative to face-to-face interventions, its effectiveness specifically within the older adults warrants further investigation.
Objective
To evaluate the effectiveness of ICBT on depression and anxiety symptoms among older adults.
Methods
Research articles retrieved from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, PsycINFO, and MEDLINE from inception to April 10, 2024, were reviewed. The search was designed to identify Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) that examined the efficacy of ICBT in reducing self-reported depression or anxiety symptoms in older adults. The quality of included studies was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials, version 2.0. Posttreatment means and standard deviations (SDs) were compared between intervention and control groups, and pooled effect sizes (Hedges' g) were calculated.
Results
A total of 11 RCTs were eligible for inclusion in this review. Compared to control groups, ICBT yielded small to medium post-treatment pooled effect sizes regarding depressive symptoms (Hedges' g = −0.65, 95 % CI −0.95 to −0.35; P < 0.001) and anxiety symptoms (Hedges' g = −0.47, 95 % CI −0.74 to −0.19; P < 0.001). Subgroup analyses showed that: (1) interventions lasting ≥8 weeks (Hedges' g = −0.88, 95 % CI −1.37 to −0.39; P < 0.001) were more effective than <8 weeks for depressive symptoms; however, <8 weeks (Hedges' g = −0.52, 95 % CI −0.93 to −0.10; P = 0.014) was more effective for anxiety symptoms; (2) ICBT delivered through slideshows was more effective than through other digital platforms for both depressive (Hedges' g = −1.36, 95 % CI −2.40 to −0.31; P = 0.011) and anxiety symptoms (Hedges' g = −1.00, 95 % CI −1.30 to −0.70; P< 0.001); and (3) non-tailored ICBT was more effective than tailored versions for both depressive (Hedges' g = −1.06, 95 % CI −2.03 to −0.09; P = 0.032) and anxiety symptoms (Hedges' g = −0.70, 95 % CI −1.14 to −0.27; P = 0.001).
Conclusions
This meta-analysis reinforces the effectiveness of ICBT in relieving depression and anxiety symptoms among older adults. Future research should identify the most effective components of ICBT to optimize their development.
期刊介绍:
General Hospital Psychiatry explores the many linkages among psychiatry, medicine, and primary care. In emphasizing a biopsychosocial approach to illness and health, the journal provides a forum for professionals with clinical, academic, and research interests in psychiatry''s role in the mainstream of medicine.