多层次学生感知教学实践概况:与能力信念、任务价值、行为参与和学业成就的关联

IF 9 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL Learning and Individual Differences Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-21 DOI:10.1016/j.lindif.2025.102631
Elizabeth Olivier , Benoit Galand , Jessica Bélanger , Alexandre J.S. Morin
{"title":"多层次学生感知教学实践概况:与能力信念、任务价值、行为参与和学业成就的关联","authors":"Elizabeth Olivier ,&nbsp;Benoit Galand ,&nbsp;Jessica Bélanger ,&nbsp;Alexandre J.S. Morin","doi":"10.1016/j.lindif.2025.102631","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The study assesses student perceptions of their teachers' practices and their associations with motivational and academic achievement. Multilevel latent profile analyses (3710 grade 9 students, 245 classrooms) identified five profiles at the student level: <em>Average with focus on rules</em> (20.50 %), <em>Average with focus on need-support</em> (30.45 %), <em>Differential treatment</em> (18.86 %), <em>Need-support and differential treatment</em> (11.70 %), and <em>High-on-all</em> (18.50 %). Students corresponding to the <em>High-on-all</em> profile reported the most positive outcomes. We identified three profiles at the classroom level: <em>Mostly differential treatment</em> (20.75 %), which was associated with the worst outcomes, <em>Average and high-on-all</em> (41.20 %), and <em>Mostly need-supportive</em> (38.06 %).</div></div><div><h3>Educational Relevance Statement</h3><div>This study has implications for initial and continuing teacher training. By identifying profiles of teaching practices perceived by students and classrooms, the study informs what combinations of practices are positively associated with different aspects of student motivation and achievement, according to their perceptions. The findings also contribute to understanding that some practices (e.g., differential treatment), generally thought to deplete student motivation, might not need to be proscribed as long as they are counterbalanced with high levels of other positive practices (e.g., need supportive practices and rule enforcement).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48336,"journal":{"name":"Learning and Individual Differences","volume":"118 ","pages":"Article 102631"},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multilevel student-perceived teaching practices profiles: Associations with competence beliefs, task value, behavioral engagement, and academic achievement\",\"authors\":\"Elizabeth Olivier ,&nbsp;Benoit Galand ,&nbsp;Jessica Bélanger ,&nbsp;Alexandre J.S. Morin\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.lindif.2025.102631\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The study assesses student perceptions of their teachers' practices and their associations with motivational and academic achievement. Multilevel latent profile analyses (3710 grade 9 students, 245 classrooms) identified five profiles at the student level: <em>Average with focus on rules</em> (20.50 %), <em>Average with focus on need-support</em> (30.45 %), <em>Differential treatment</em> (18.86 %), <em>Need-support and differential treatment</em> (11.70 %), and <em>High-on-all</em> (18.50 %). Students corresponding to the <em>High-on-all</em> profile reported the most positive outcomes. We identified three profiles at the classroom level: <em>Mostly differential treatment</em> (20.75 %), which was associated with the worst outcomes, <em>Average and high-on-all</em> (41.20 %), and <em>Mostly need-supportive</em> (38.06 %).</div></div><div><h3>Educational Relevance Statement</h3><div>This study has implications for initial and continuing teacher training. By identifying profiles of teaching practices perceived by students and classrooms, the study informs what combinations of practices are positively associated with different aspects of student motivation and achievement, according to their perceptions. The findings also contribute to understanding that some practices (e.g., differential treatment), generally thought to deplete student motivation, might not need to be proscribed as long as they are counterbalanced with high levels of other positive practices (e.g., need supportive practices and rule enforcement).</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48336,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Learning and Individual Differences\",\"volume\":\"118 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102631\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Learning and Individual Differences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1041608025000068\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning and Individual Differences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1041608025000068","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

该研究评估了学生对教师实践的看法及其与动机和学业成就的联系。多层次潜在特征分析(3710名九年级学生,245个教室)确定了学生层面的五种特征:平均关注规则(20.50%),平均关注需求支持(30.45%),差异待遇(18.86%),需求支持和差异待遇(11.70%),以及高水平(18.50%)。所有人都高调的学生报告了最积极的结果。我们在课堂层面确定了三种情况:主要是差别待遇(20.75%),这与最差的结果有关,平均和高(41.20%),主要是需要支持(38.06%)。教育相关性声明本研究对教师的初始和继续培训具有启示意义。通过识别学生和课堂所感知的教学实践概况,该研究告知哪些实践组合与学生动机和成就的不同方面呈正相关,根据他们的感知。研究结果还有助于理解,一些通常被认为会耗尽学生动力的做法(例如,差别待遇),可能不需要被禁止,只要它们与其他高水平的积极做法(例如,需要支持性做法和规则执行)相平衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Multilevel student-perceived teaching practices profiles: Associations with competence beliefs, task value, behavioral engagement, and academic achievement
The study assesses student perceptions of their teachers' practices and their associations with motivational and academic achievement. Multilevel latent profile analyses (3710 grade 9 students, 245 classrooms) identified five profiles at the student level: Average with focus on rules (20.50 %), Average with focus on need-support (30.45 %), Differential treatment (18.86 %), Need-support and differential treatment (11.70 %), and High-on-all (18.50 %). Students corresponding to the High-on-all profile reported the most positive outcomes. We identified three profiles at the classroom level: Mostly differential treatment (20.75 %), which was associated with the worst outcomes, Average and high-on-all (41.20 %), and Mostly need-supportive (38.06 %).

Educational Relevance Statement

This study has implications for initial and continuing teacher training. By identifying profiles of teaching practices perceived by students and classrooms, the study informs what combinations of practices are positively associated with different aspects of student motivation and achievement, according to their perceptions. The findings also contribute to understanding that some practices (e.g., differential treatment), generally thought to deplete student motivation, might not need to be proscribed as long as they are counterbalanced with high levels of other positive practices (e.g., need supportive practices and rule enforcement).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Learning and Individual Differences
Learning and Individual Differences PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL-
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
2.80%
发文量
86
期刊介绍: Learning and Individual Differences is a research journal devoted to publishing articles of individual differences as they relate to learning within an educational context. The Journal focuses on original empirical studies of high theoretical and methodological rigor that that make a substantial scientific contribution. Learning and Individual Differences publishes original research. Manuscripts should be no longer than 7500 words of primary text (not including tables, figures, references).
期刊最新文献
Early nonsymbolic proportional estimation strategies and their contributions to math achievement Multimodally assessed adaptive reactions to errors in primary school students and their relation to knowledge acquisition Heterogeneity in developmental trajectories of early literacy: The role of child demographics and emergent literacy skills Reducing educational inequalities through metacognition? Evidence from an early childhood teachers' training program Does reflecting one's own ideas affect creativity? Metacognitive monitoring activation shows no effect on divergent thinking
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1