通过应用dall - e2优化野生蓝莓自动化中机器学习模型的数据采集需求

IF 5.7 Q1 AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING Smart agricultural technology Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-28 DOI:10.1016/j.atech.2024.100764
Connor C. Mullins, Travis J. Esau, Qamar U. Zaman, Patrick J. Hennessy
{"title":"通过应用dall - e2优化野生蓝莓自动化中机器学习模型的数据采集需求","authors":"Connor C. Mullins,&nbsp;Travis J. Esau,&nbsp;Qamar U. Zaman,&nbsp;Patrick J. Hennessy","doi":"10.1016/j.atech.2024.100764","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This research developed a workflow to assess the viability of AI-generated imagery in training machine learning models for detecting ripe wild blueberries (<em>Vaccinium angustifolium</em> Ait.), hair fescue weeds (<em>Festuca filiformis</em> Pourr.), and red leaf disease (<em>Exobasidium vaccinii</em>). Ground truth images were collected and augmented with AI-generated variations using DALL-E 2 to expand the dataset. Models were trained on three datasets: ground truth, generated, and a combination (40% generated images). Evaluation metrics included precision, recall, mAP<sub>50</sub>, and mAP<sub>50–95</sub>, analyzed using ANOVA multiple mean comparisons and Tukey's HSD test (α = 0.05). For ripe wild blueberries, combination models achieved the highest performance across all metrics (mAP<sub>50</sub>: 0.834), significantly outperforming the ground truth model (mAP<sub>50</sub>: 0.806) in terms of mAP<sub>50–95</sub> (0.478 compared to 0.424). For hair fescue weeds, the combination dataset outperformed others with the highest mAP<sub>50</sub> (0.983), closely followed by the ground truth dataset (mAP<sub>50</sub>: 0.969). In detecting red leaf disease, the combination dataset showed the best performance (mAP<sub>50</sub>: 0.848 ± 0.140, mAP<sub>50–95</sub>: 0.607 ± 0.219), compared to the ground truth (mAP<sub>50</sub>: 0.615 ± 0.092, mAP<sub>50–95</sub>: 0.417 ± 0.045) and generated datasets (mAP<sub>50</sub>: 0.245 ± 0.088, mAP<sub>50–95</sub>: 0.144 ± 0.059). Models trained solely on generated images showed significantly lower performance across all categories except the precision metric for red leaf, where performance was comparable to ground truth. This indicated that while AI-generated images can augment datasets and improve generalization, they cannot fully replace ground truth data while maintaining model performance. Integrating AI-generated images with real-world data significantly improved model performance, reduced labor-intensive data collection processes, and provided a more diverse and comprehensive dataset for training, underscoring the importance of a balanced approach to optimizing data collection protocols for wild blueberry cultivation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74813,"journal":{"name":"Smart agricultural technology","volume":"10 ","pages":"Article 100764"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimizing data collection requirements for machine learning models in wild blueberry automation through the application of DALL-E 2\",\"authors\":\"Connor C. Mullins,&nbsp;Travis J. Esau,&nbsp;Qamar U. Zaman,&nbsp;Patrick J. Hennessy\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.atech.2024.100764\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This research developed a workflow to assess the viability of AI-generated imagery in training machine learning models for detecting ripe wild blueberries (<em>Vaccinium angustifolium</em> Ait.), hair fescue weeds (<em>Festuca filiformis</em> Pourr.), and red leaf disease (<em>Exobasidium vaccinii</em>). Ground truth images were collected and augmented with AI-generated variations using DALL-E 2 to expand the dataset. Models were trained on three datasets: ground truth, generated, and a combination (40% generated images). Evaluation metrics included precision, recall, mAP<sub>50</sub>, and mAP<sub>50–95</sub>, analyzed using ANOVA multiple mean comparisons and Tukey's HSD test (α = 0.05). For ripe wild blueberries, combination models achieved the highest performance across all metrics (mAP<sub>50</sub>: 0.834), significantly outperforming the ground truth model (mAP<sub>50</sub>: 0.806) in terms of mAP<sub>50–95</sub> (0.478 compared to 0.424). For hair fescue weeds, the combination dataset outperformed others with the highest mAP<sub>50</sub> (0.983), closely followed by the ground truth dataset (mAP<sub>50</sub>: 0.969). In detecting red leaf disease, the combination dataset showed the best performance (mAP<sub>50</sub>: 0.848 ± 0.140, mAP<sub>50–95</sub>: 0.607 ± 0.219), compared to the ground truth (mAP<sub>50</sub>: 0.615 ± 0.092, mAP<sub>50–95</sub>: 0.417 ± 0.045) and generated datasets (mAP<sub>50</sub>: 0.245 ± 0.088, mAP<sub>50–95</sub>: 0.144 ± 0.059). Models trained solely on generated images showed significantly lower performance across all categories except the precision metric for red leaf, where performance was comparable to ground truth. This indicated that while AI-generated images can augment datasets and improve generalization, they cannot fully replace ground truth data while maintaining model performance. Integrating AI-generated images with real-world data significantly improved model performance, reduced labor-intensive data collection processes, and provided a more diverse and comprehensive dataset for training, underscoring the importance of a balanced approach to optimizing data collection protocols for wild blueberry cultivation.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74813,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Smart agricultural technology\",\"volume\":\"10 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100764\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Smart agricultural technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S277237552400368X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Smart agricultural technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S277237552400368X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究开发了一个工作流程,以评估人工智能生成的图像在训练机器学习模型中检测成熟野生蓝莓(Vaccinium angustifolium Ait.)、毛茅杂草(Festuca filiformis Pourr.)和红叶病(Exobasidium vaccinii)的可行性。收集地面真实图像,并使用dall - e2对人工智能生成的变化进行增强,以扩展数据集。模型在三个数据集上进行训练:ground truth, generated和combination(40%生成图像)。评价指标包括精密度、召回率、mAP50和mAP50 - 95,采用方差分析多均值比较和Tukey’s HSD检验(α = 0.05)进行分析。对于成熟的野生蓝莓,组合模型在所有指标上都取得了最高的性能(mAP50: 0.834),在mAP50 - 95(0.478比0.424)方面显著优于基础真值模型(mAP50: 0.806)。对于毛茅杂草,组合数据集的mAP50最高(0.983),紧随其后的是地面真相数据集(mAP50: 0.969)。在红叶病检测中,组合数据集(mAP50: 0.848±0.140,mAP50 - 95: 0.607±0.219)优于地面真实数据集(mAP50: 0.615±0.092,mAP50 - 95: 0.417±0.045)和生成数据集(mAP50: 0.245±0.088,mAP50 - 95: 0.144±0.059)。仅在生成的图像上训练的模型在所有类别中都表现出明显较低的性能,除了红叶的精度指标,其性能与地面真实值相当。这表明,虽然人工智能生成的图像可以增强数据集并提高泛化,但它们不能在保持模型性能的同时完全取代地面真实数据。将人工智能生成的图像与现实世界的数据相结合,显著提高了模型的性能,减少了劳动密集型的数据收集过程,并为训练提供了更多样化和全面的数据集,强调了平衡方法对优化野生蓝莓种植数据收集协议的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Optimizing data collection requirements for machine learning models in wild blueberry automation through the application of DALL-E 2
This research developed a workflow to assess the viability of AI-generated imagery in training machine learning models for detecting ripe wild blueberries (Vaccinium angustifolium Ait.), hair fescue weeds (Festuca filiformis Pourr.), and red leaf disease (Exobasidium vaccinii). Ground truth images were collected and augmented with AI-generated variations using DALL-E 2 to expand the dataset. Models were trained on three datasets: ground truth, generated, and a combination (40% generated images). Evaluation metrics included precision, recall, mAP50, and mAP50–95, analyzed using ANOVA multiple mean comparisons and Tukey's HSD test (α = 0.05). For ripe wild blueberries, combination models achieved the highest performance across all metrics (mAP50: 0.834), significantly outperforming the ground truth model (mAP50: 0.806) in terms of mAP50–95 (0.478 compared to 0.424). For hair fescue weeds, the combination dataset outperformed others with the highest mAP50 (0.983), closely followed by the ground truth dataset (mAP50: 0.969). In detecting red leaf disease, the combination dataset showed the best performance (mAP50: 0.848 ± 0.140, mAP50–95: 0.607 ± 0.219), compared to the ground truth (mAP50: 0.615 ± 0.092, mAP50–95: 0.417 ± 0.045) and generated datasets (mAP50: 0.245 ± 0.088, mAP50–95: 0.144 ± 0.059). Models trained solely on generated images showed significantly lower performance across all categories except the precision metric for red leaf, where performance was comparable to ground truth. This indicated that while AI-generated images can augment datasets and improve generalization, they cannot fully replace ground truth data while maintaining model performance. Integrating AI-generated images with real-world data significantly improved model performance, reduced labor-intensive data collection processes, and provided a more diverse and comprehensive dataset for training, underscoring the importance of a balanced approach to optimizing data collection protocols for wild blueberry cultivation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Detection and gradation of sweet potato storage roots by machine vision and deep learning YOLO-EHS: A lightweight deep learning framework for Xinmei detection and Multi-scale integration in orchard Smart insemination protocols based on CHAID decision trees for precision reproductive management and improved prolificacy in Murciano-Granadina does A field-deployable smart phenotyping system for fine-grained chili variety identification from leaf morphology Spectral preprocessing methods combined with data downscaling techniques improved the prediction accuracy of soil structure indicators
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1