对人工智能聊天机器人的信任:系统回顾

IF 7.6 2区 管理学 Q1 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Telematics and Informatics Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.tele.2025.102240
Sheryl Wei Ting Ng , Renwen Zhang
{"title":"对人工智能聊天机器人的信任:系统回顾","authors":"Sheryl Wei Ting Ng ,&nbsp;Renwen Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.tele.2025.102240","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) have enabled increasingly natural and human-like interactions with conversational agents (chatbots). However, the processes and outcomes of trust in AI chatbots remain underexplored. This study provides a systematic review of how trust in AI chatbots is defined, operationalised, and studied, synthesizing factors influencing trust development and its outcomes. An analysis of 40 articles revealed notable variations and inconsistencies in trust conceptualisations and operationalisations. Predictors of trust are categorized into five groups: user, machine, interaction, social, and context-related factors. Trust in AI chatbots leads to diverse outcomes that span affective, relational, behavioural, cognitive, and psychological domains. The review underscores the need for longitudinal studies to better understand the dynamics and boundary conditions of trust development. These findings offer valuable insights for advancing human–machine communication (HMC) research and informing the design of trustworthy AI systems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48257,"journal":{"name":"Telematics and Informatics","volume":"97 ","pages":"Article 102240"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trust in AI chatbots: A systematic review\",\"authors\":\"Sheryl Wei Ting Ng ,&nbsp;Renwen Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tele.2025.102240\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) have enabled increasingly natural and human-like interactions with conversational agents (chatbots). However, the processes and outcomes of trust in AI chatbots remain underexplored. This study provides a systematic review of how trust in AI chatbots is defined, operationalised, and studied, synthesizing factors influencing trust development and its outcomes. An analysis of 40 articles revealed notable variations and inconsistencies in trust conceptualisations and operationalisations. Predictors of trust are categorized into five groups: user, machine, interaction, social, and context-related factors. Trust in AI chatbots leads to diverse outcomes that span affective, relational, behavioural, cognitive, and psychological domains. The review underscores the need for longitudinal studies to better understand the dynamics and boundary conditions of trust development. These findings offer valuable insights for advancing human–machine communication (HMC) research and informing the design of trustworthy AI systems.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48257,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Telematics and Informatics\",\"volume\":\"97 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102240\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Telematics and Informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0736585325000024\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Telematics and Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0736585325000024","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人工智能(AI)的进步使人们与对话代理(聊天机器人)之间的互动越来越自然,越来越像人与人之间的互动。然而,人工智能聊天机器人的信任过程和结果仍未得到充分探索。本研究对如何定义、操作和研究人工智能聊天机器人中的信任进行了系统回顾,综合了影响信任发展及其结果的因素。对 40 篇文章的分析表明,信任概念和操作方法存在明显的差异和不一致。信任的预测因素分为五类:用户、机器、交互、社会和情境相关因素。对人工智能聊天机器人的信任会导致情感、关系、行为、认知和心理领域的各种结果。综述强调了进行纵向研究的必要性,以便更好地了解信任发展的动态和边界条件。这些发现为推进人机交流(HMC)研究和设计值得信赖的人工智能系统提供了宝贵的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Trust in AI chatbots: A systematic review
Advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) have enabled increasingly natural and human-like interactions with conversational agents (chatbots). However, the processes and outcomes of trust in AI chatbots remain underexplored. This study provides a systematic review of how trust in AI chatbots is defined, operationalised, and studied, synthesizing factors influencing trust development and its outcomes. An analysis of 40 articles revealed notable variations and inconsistencies in trust conceptualisations and operationalisations. Predictors of trust are categorized into five groups: user, machine, interaction, social, and context-related factors. Trust in AI chatbots leads to diverse outcomes that span affective, relational, behavioural, cognitive, and psychological domains. The review underscores the need for longitudinal studies to better understand the dynamics and boundary conditions of trust development. These findings offer valuable insights for advancing human–machine communication (HMC) research and informing the design of trustworthy AI systems.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Telematics and Informatics
Telematics and Informatics INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
17.00
自引率
4.70%
发文量
104
审稿时长
24 days
期刊介绍: Telematics and Informatics is an interdisciplinary journal that publishes cutting-edge theoretical and methodological research exploring the social, economic, geographic, political, and cultural impacts of digital technologies. It covers various application areas, such as smart cities, sensors, information fusion, digital society, IoT, cyber-physical technologies, privacy, knowledge management, distributed work, emergency response, mobile communications, health informatics, social media's psychosocial effects, ICT for sustainable development, blockchain, e-commerce, and e-government.
期刊最新文献
Who wants to be a YouTuber? Personality traits predict the desire to become a social media influencer Nurture over nature? The effects of inferred personality traits and structural social capital on individual resilience Overloaded yet addicted? A meta-analysis of the outcomes of social media overload Artificial humanity: A multi-method exploration of user responses to AI influencer affordances in short video platform Trust in AI chatbots: A systematic review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1