IF 7.6 2区 管理学 Q1 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Telematics and Informatics Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.tele.2025.102242
Qiaoyi Xue , Yu-Chi Lee
{"title":"How emojis and relationships shape sarcasm perception in computer-mediated communication","authors":"Qiaoyi Xue ,&nbsp;Yu-Chi Lee","doi":"10.1016/j.tele.2025.102242","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Previous studies have reported that the ‘Wink’ emoji <figure><img></figure> is considered an effective indicator of sarcasm in computer-mediated communication. However, few studies have compared the effects of different emojis on perceptions of sarcasm and available information about how emojis and relationships jointly affect perceptions of sarcasm. Thus, this study investigates how emojis and sender-receiver relationships influence the perception of sarcasm in ambiguous texts, whether positive or negative. A total of 127 Chinese participants rated sarcasm, unfriendliness, and humour across 36 communication scenarios (six emojis × three relationships × two sentence valences). The three-way analysis of variance results indicated that the use of the ‘Unamused’ emoji <figure><img></figure> significantly affects the sarcasm perception and emotional responses to ambiguous text replies, where it is an effective indicator of sarcastic criticism. The use of the ‘Wink’ emoji <figure><img></figure> affects sarcasm perceptions and emotional responses to ambiguous messages. In Eastern cultures, using a ‘Wink’ emoji <figure><img></figure> in positive ambiguous replies tends to reduce the sarcastic tone, which contrasts with the findings from Western contexts. The ‘Tears of joy’ <figure><img></figure>, ‘Smirk’<figure><img></figure>, and ‘Smiling’ <figure><img></figure>emojis provide only limited enhancement, resulting in ambiguous interpretations. In addition, the effects of relationship and sentence valence were significant for emotional perception. These findings may support clearer communication and more harmonious relationships.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48257,"journal":{"name":"Telematics and Informatics","volume":"97 ","pages":"Article 102242"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Telematics and Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0736585325000048","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

以往的研究表明,在以计算机为媒介的交流中,"眨眼 "表情符号被认为是讽刺意味的有效指标。然而,很少有研究比较过不同表情符号对讽刺感知的影响,也很少有研究提供关于表情符号和人际关系如何共同影响讽刺感知的信息。因此,本研究探讨了表情符号和发件人与收件人之间的关系如何影响对含混文本中讽刺意味的感知,无论是正面的还是负面的。共有 127 名中国受试者对 36 个交流场景(6 个表情符号 × 3 种关系 × 2 种句子价值)中的讽刺、不友好和幽默进行了评分。三因素方差分析结果表明,使用 "不开心 "表情符号会显著影响对暧昧文本回复的讽刺感知和情绪反应,它是讽刺性批评的有效指标。眨眼 "表情符号的使用会影响对含糊信息的讽刺感知和情感反应。在东方文化中,在正面的模棱两可的回复中使用 "眨眼 "表情符号往往会减少讽刺的语气,这与西方的研究结果形成了鲜明的对比。喜极而泣"、"傻笑 "和 "微笑 "表情符号只能提供有限的增强效果,从而导致模棱两可的解释。此外,关系和句子效价对情绪感知的影响也很显著。这些发现可能有助于更清晰的沟通和更和谐的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
How emojis and relationships shape sarcasm perception in computer-mediated communication
Previous studies have reported that the ‘Wink’ emoji
is considered an effective indicator of sarcasm in computer-mediated communication. However, few studies have compared the effects of different emojis on perceptions of sarcasm and available information about how emojis and relationships jointly affect perceptions of sarcasm. Thus, this study investigates how emojis and sender-receiver relationships influence the perception of sarcasm in ambiguous texts, whether positive or negative. A total of 127 Chinese participants rated sarcasm, unfriendliness, and humour across 36 communication scenarios (six emojis × three relationships × two sentence valences). The three-way analysis of variance results indicated that the use of the ‘Unamused’ emoji
significantly affects the sarcasm perception and emotional responses to ambiguous text replies, where it is an effective indicator of sarcastic criticism. The use of the ‘Wink’ emoji
affects sarcasm perceptions and emotional responses to ambiguous messages. In Eastern cultures, using a ‘Wink’ emoji
in positive ambiguous replies tends to reduce the sarcastic tone, which contrasts with the findings from Western contexts. The ‘Tears of joy’
, ‘Smirk’
, and ‘Smiling’
emojis provide only limited enhancement, resulting in ambiguous interpretations. In addition, the effects of relationship and sentence valence were significant for emotional perception. These findings may support clearer communication and more harmonious relationships.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Telematics and Informatics
Telematics and Informatics INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
17.00
自引率
4.70%
发文量
104
审稿时长
24 days
期刊介绍: Telematics and Informatics is an interdisciplinary journal that publishes cutting-edge theoretical and methodological research exploring the social, economic, geographic, political, and cultural impacts of digital technologies. It covers various application areas, such as smart cities, sensors, information fusion, digital society, IoT, cyber-physical technologies, privacy, knowledge management, distributed work, emergency response, mobile communications, health informatics, social media's psychosocial effects, ICT for sustainable development, blockchain, e-commerce, and e-government.
期刊最新文献
Who wants to be a YouTuber? Personality traits predict the desire to become a social media influencer Nurture over nature? The effects of inferred personality traits and structural social capital on individual resilience Overloaded yet addicted? A meta-analysis of the outcomes of social media overload Artificial humanity: A multi-method exploration of user responses to AI influencer affordances in short video platform Trust in AI chatbots: A systematic review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1