{"title":"非接触式血压计Mark II的临床评价。","authors":"B C Chauhan, D B Henson","doi":"10.1097/00006324-198809000-00010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of this investigation was to test the reliability of the American Optical Non-Contact Tonometer Mark II (NCT II) using the Goldmann Applanation Tonometer (GAT) as the validating instrument. The sample contained 102 consecutive patients from our University Eye Clinic, of whom one-half had 4 NCT II measurements first, followed by 4 GAT measurements; the other one-half had 4 GAT measurements first, followed by 4 NCT II measurements. No significant change in intraocular pressure (IOP) was noted over the measurement sequence with either instrument. There was no significant difference between paired NCT II and GAT readings when the NCT II was used first; however, a highly significant difference between paired readings was obtained when the GAT was used first, indicating that the GAT measurement produced a delayed reduction in the IOP. This effect did not occur with the NCT II. Although the NCT II is shown to have a good overall reliability when compared to the GAT in both protocols, the agreement between any two tonometers may be influenced greatly by the very process of taking a measurement and by the dynamic nature of the IOP.</p>","PeriodicalId":7700,"journal":{"name":"American journal of optometry and physiological optics","volume":"65 9","pages":"751-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1988-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/00006324-198809000-00010","citationCount":"16","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical evaluation of the Non-Contact Tonometer Mark II.\",\"authors\":\"B C Chauhan, D B Henson\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/00006324-198809000-00010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The purpose of this investigation was to test the reliability of the American Optical Non-Contact Tonometer Mark II (NCT II) using the Goldmann Applanation Tonometer (GAT) as the validating instrument. The sample contained 102 consecutive patients from our University Eye Clinic, of whom one-half had 4 NCT II measurements first, followed by 4 GAT measurements; the other one-half had 4 GAT measurements first, followed by 4 NCT II measurements. No significant change in intraocular pressure (IOP) was noted over the measurement sequence with either instrument. There was no significant difference between paired NCT II and GAT readings when the NCT II was used first; however, a highly significant difference between paired readings was obtained when the GAT was used first, indicating that the GAT measurement produced a delayed reduction in the IOP. This effect did not occur with the NCT II. Although the NCT II is shown to have a good overall reliability when compared to the GAT in both protocols, the agreement between any two tonometers may be influenced greatly by the very process of taking a measurement and by the dynamic nature of the IOP.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7700,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of optometry and physiological optics\",\"volume\":\"65 9\",\"pages\":\"751-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1988-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/00006324-198809000-00010\",\"citationCount\":\"16\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of optometry and physiological optics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/00006324-198809000-00010\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of optometry and physiological optics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/00006324-198809000-00010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16
摘要
本研究的目的是测试美国光学非接触式眼压计Mark II (NCT II)的可靠性,使用Goldmann压平眼压计(GAT)作为验证仪器。样本包含102名来自我们大学眼科诊所的连续患者,其中一半患者首先进行4次NCT II测量,然后进行4次GAT测量;另一半先进行4次GAT测量,然后进行4次NCT II测量。两种仪器在测量过程中均未观察到眼压(IOP)的显著变化。当第一次使用NCT II时,配对的NCT II和GAT读数没有显著差异;然而,当首次使用GAT时,配对读数之间的差异非常显著,这表明GAT测量产生了延迟的IOP降低。这种效应在NCT II中没有发生。尽管在两种方案中,与GAT相比,NCT II显示出良好的总体可靠性,但任何两个眼压计之间的一致性可能会受到测量过程和眼压的动态特性的极大影响。
Clinical evaluation of the Non-Contact Tonometer Mark II.
The purpose of this investigation was to test the reliability of the American Optical Non-Contact Tonometer Mark II (NCT II) using the Goldmann Applanation Tonometer (GAT) as the validating instrument. The sample contained 102 consecutive patients from our University Eye Clinic, of whom one-half had 4 NCT II measurements first, followed by 4 GAT measurements; the other one-half had 4 GAT measurements first, followed by 4 NCT II measurements. No significant change in intraocular pressure (IOP) was noted over the measurement sequence with either instrument. There was no significant difference between paired NCT II and GAT readings when the NCT II was used first; however, a highly significant difference between paired readings was obtained when the GAT was used first, indicating that the GAT measurement produced a delayed reduction in the IOP. This effect did not occur with the NCT II. Although the NCT II is shown to have a good overall reliability when compared to the GAT in both protocols, the agreement between any two tonometers may be influenced greatly by the very process of taking a measurement and by the dynamic nature of the IOP.