IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Acta radiologica Pub Date : 2025-02-04 DOI:10.1177/02841851241313021
Theresa Mokry, Judith Pantke, Hans-Ulrich Kauczor, Frederik B Laun, Heinz-Peter Schlemmer, Tristan A Kuder, Sebastian Bickelhaupt
{"title":"Influence of field strength on quantitative parameters and feature stability in the assessment of the ovaries using 1.5-T and 3-T MRI.","authors":"Theresa Mokry, Judith Pantke, Hans-Ulrich Kauczor, Frederik B Laun, Heinz-Peter Schlemmer, Tristan A Kuder, Sebastian Bickelhaupt","doi":"10.1177/02841851241313021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Little is known of the influence of scanner field strength on quantitative diffusivity variables, especially kurtosis in healthy ovaries.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the influence of scanner field strength on quantitative diffusion variables in pelvic MRI of the ovaries.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This prospective, single-centre study consisted of repeated 1.5-T and 3-T examinations in 30 female volunteers (mean age=27.9 years, age range=20.3-45.2 years) from July 2017 to September 2019. Multi b-value DWI 0, 50, 100, 800, 1500, 2000 s/mm<sup>2</sup> was acquired over three timepoints during the menstrual cycle. Ovaries were segmented at b = 1500 s/mm<sup>2</sup>. Median apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and advanced kurtosis parameters D<sub>app</sub> and K<sub>app</sub> were calculated. Statistical analysis was performed with the variations of diffusivity variables being compared between 1.5-T and 3-T MRI using a Mann-Whitney rank-sum test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Median ADC and D<sub>app</sub> (µm²/ms) did not statistically differ. Median ADC were 1.509 (range=1.371-1.610), 1.619 (range=1.463-1.747), and 1.511 (range=1.423-1.639) at 1.5 T; 1.542 (range=1.428-1.682), 1.658 (range=1.510-1.806), and 1.572 (range=1.455-1.709) at 3 T (<i>P</i> = 0.14, 0.19, and 0.07), whereas median D<sub>app</sub> were 2.024 (range=1.913-2.152), 2.192 (range=2.010-2.327), and 2.045 (range=1.958-2.170) at 1.5 T; 2.013 (range=1.952-2.188), 2.179 (range=2.018-2.327), and 2.082 (range=1.959-2.194) at 3 T (<i>P</i> = 0.77, 0.99, and 0.34) for timepoints 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Statistical comparison of K<sub>app</sub> revealed significant differences for all timepoints: 0.629 (range=0.595-0.652), 0.604 (range=0.574-0.651), and 0.622 (range=0.581-0.664) at 1.5 T; 0.601 (range=0.563-0.626), 0.567 (range=0.526-0.633), and 0.599 (range=0.541-0.650) at 3 T (<i>P</i> < 0.001, 0.005, and 0.03).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Diffusivity mapping in the ovaries provides similar absolute median diffusion values, but statistically significant differences in absolute kurtosis values between 1.5 T and 3 T.</p>","PeriodicalId":7143,"journal":{"name":"Acta radiologica","volume":" ","pages":"2841851241313021"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta radiologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02841851241313021","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:目的:评估扫描仪场强对卵巢盆腔 MRI 定量弥散变量的影响:这项前瞻性、单中心研究包括2017年7月至2019年9月对30名女性志愿者(平均年龄=27.9岁,年龄范围=20.3-45.2岁)重复进行1.5T和3T检查。在月经周期的三个时间点采集了0、50、100、800、1500、2000 s/mm2的多b值DWI。卵巢在 b = 1500 s/mm2 时被分割。计算中位表观扩散系数(ADC)和高级峰度参数 Dapp 和 Kapp。使用 Mann-Whitney 秩和检验对 1.5-T 和 3-T MRI 的扩散变量变化进行比较,并进行统计分析:结果:中位 ADC 和 Dapp(µm²/ms)没有统计学差异。1.5 T 的 ADC 中位数分别为 1.509(范围=1.371-1.610)、1.619(范围=1.463-1.747)和 1.511(范围=1.423-1.639);1.542(范围=1.428-1.682)、1.658(范围=1.510-1.806)和1.572(范围=1.455-1.709)(P=0.14、0.19和0.07),而Dapp中值为2.1.5T时分别为2.024(范围=1.913-2.152)、2.192(范围=2.010-2.327)和2.045(范围=1.958-2.170);3T时分别为2.013(范围=1.952-2.188)、2.179(范围=2.018-2.327)和2.082(范围=1.959-2.194)(P=0.77、0.99和0.34)。对 Kapp 的统计比较显示,所有时间点均存在显著差异:在 1.5 T 时为 0.629(范围=0.595-0.652)、0.604(范围=0.574-0.651)和 0.622(范围=0.581-0.664);在 3 T 时为 0.601(范围=0.563-0.626)、0.567(范围=0.526-0.633)和 0.599(范围=0.541-0.650)(P 结论):卵巢弥散分布图提供了相似的绝对中位弥散值,但 1.5 T 和 3 T 的绝对峰度值在统计学上存在显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Influence of field strength on quantitative parameters and feature stability in the assessment of the ovaries using 1.5-T and 3-T MRI.

Background: Little is known of the influence of scanner field strength on quantitative diffusivity variables, especially kurtosis in healthy ovaries.

Purpose: To evaluate the influence of scanner field strength on quantitative diffusion variables in pelvic MRI of the ovaries.

Material and methods: This prospective, single-centre study consisted of repeated 1.5-T and 3-T examinations in 30 female volunteers (mean age=27.9 years, age range=20.3-45.2 years) from July 2017 to September 2019. Multi b-value DWI 0, 50, 100, 800, 1500, 2000 s/mm2 was acquired over three timepoints during the menstrual cycle. Ovaries were segmented at b = 1500 s/mm2. Median apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and advanced kurtosis parameters Dapp and Kapp were calculated. Statistical analysis was performed with the variations of diffusivity variables being compared between 1.5-T and 3-T MRI using a Mann-Whitney rank-sum test.

Results: Median ADC and Dapp (µm²/ms) did not statistically differ. Median ADC were 1.509 (range=1.371-1.610), 1.619 (range=1.463-1.747), and 1.511 (range=1.423-1.639) at 1.5 T; 1.542 (range=1.428-1.682), 1.658 (range=1.510-1.806), and 1.572 (range=1.455-1.709) at 3 T (P = 0.14, 0.19, and 0.07), whereas median Dapp were 2.024 (range=1.913-2.152), 2.192 (range=2.010-2.327), and 2.045 (range=1.958-2.170) at 1.5 T; 2.013 (range=1.952-2.188), 2.179 (range=2.018-2.327), and 2.082 (range=1.959-2.194) at 3 T (P = 0.77, 0.99, and 0.34) for timepoints 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Statistical comparison of Kapp revealed significant differences for all timepoints: 0.629 (range=0.595-0.652), 0.604 (range=0.574-0.651), and 0.622 (range=0.581-0.664) at 1.5 T; 0.601 (range=0.563-0.626), 0.567 (range=0.526-0.633), and 0.599 (range=0.541-0.650) at 3 T (P < 0.001, 0.005, and 0.03).

Conclusion: Diffusivity mapping in the ovaries provides similar absolute median diffusion values, but statistically significant differences in absolute kurtosis values between 1.5 T and 3 T.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta radiologica
Acta radiologica 医学-核医学
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
170
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Radiologica publishes articles on all aspects of radiology, from clinical radiology to experimental work. It is known for articles based on experimental work and contrast media research, giving priority to scientific original papers. The distinguished international editorial board also invite review articles, short communications and technical and instrumental notes.
期刊最新文献
Patients with ACL injury have lower and more posterior position of proximal tibiofibular joint than patients with intact ACL. Association of gray and white matter volumes, clinical features, neurofilament light chain, and glial fibrillary acidic protein in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Radiomics analysis of substantia nigra on multi-echo susceptibility map-weighted imaging for differentiating Parkinson's disease from atypical parkinsonian syndromes. Some common statistical methods for assessing rater agreement in radiological studies. Stage pT0-T1 rectal cancers: emphasis on submucosal high intensity on high-resolution T2-weighted imaging and other morphological features.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1