竞争优势:通过团队竞赛提高美国外科培训委员会考试成绩。

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY American Surgeon Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-04 DOI:10.1177/00031348251318381
Sean E Masters, Kathryn K Howard, Darci C Foote, Joshua Halka, Diane Studzinski, Rose Callahan, Felicia A Ivascu, Begum Akay
{"title":"竞争优势:通过团队竞赛提高美国外科培训委员会考试成绩。","authors":"Sean E Masters, Kathryn K Howard, Darci C Foote, Joshua Halka, Diane Studzinski, Rose Callahan, Felicia A Ivascu, Begum Akay","doi":"10.1177/00031348251318381","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundThe American Board of Surgery (ABS) In-Training Examination (ABSITE) scores are predictive of passing the ABS qualifying exam and have become a marker of residency education success. A competitive team-based approach to encourage self-studying and didactic participation is a novel method of ABSITE preparation. We aimed to determine if this method significantly improves residents' percentile performances on the ABSITE.MethodsRetrospective review of ABSITE percentile scores were compared before and after implementation of a purchased online question bank (TrueLearn LLC, Mooresville, NC), a team-based competition, and a virtual format of the team-based competition.ResultsThe median ABSITE percentile at the program level increased from 40.0 (IQR 21.0-67.0) in 2011 to 77.0 by 2022 (IQR 60.0-91.0) (<i>P</i> < 0.0001). After implementation of the team-based competition, ABSITE median percentile rose significantly from 67.0 (IQR 31.5-85.5) to 84.5 (IQR 60.8-91.0) (<i>P</i> = 0.026). This did not change significantly after a transition to a virtual format of the team-based competition in 2021 (<i>P</i> = 0.146) and 2022 (<i>P</i> = 0.335). There was no significant relationship between the number of TrueLearn questions taken and ABSITE scores specifically before and after implementation of the team-based competition (AUC = 0.0002, Spearman's r (67) 0.064, <i>P</i> = 0.605). Furthermore, the team-based competition was well received by residents and was believed to be beneficial to their studying.DiscussionThe team-based competition is easy to implement and improves ABSITE performance through means other than encouraging residents to take more practice questions. The team-based competition is well-received by residents and may prove beneficial to board examination preparation and pass rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":7782,"journal":{"name":"American Surgeon","volume":" ","pages":"933-939"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Competitive Edge: Improving American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination Scores Through a Team-Based Competition.\",\"authors\":\"Sean E Masters, Kathryn K Howard, Darci C Foote, Joshua Halka, Diane Studzinski, Rose Callahan, Felicia A Ivascu, Begum Akay\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00031348251318381\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>BackgroundThe American Board of Surgery (ABS) In-Training Examination (ABSITE) scores are predictive of passing the ABS qualifying exam and have become a marker of residency education success. A competitive team-based approach to encourage self-studying and didactic participation is a novel method of ABSITE preparation. We aimed to determine if this method significantly improves residents' percentile performances on the ABSITE.MethodsRetrospective review of ABSITE percentile scores were compared before and after implementation of a purchased online question bank (TrueLearn LLC, Mooresville, NC), a team-based competition, and a virtual format of the team-based competition.ResultsThe median ABSITE percentile at the program level increased from 40.0 (IQR 21.0-67.0) in 2011 to 77.0 by 2022 (IQR 60.0-91.0) (<i>P</i> < 0.0001). After implementation of the team-based competition, ABSITE median percentile rose significantly from 67.0 (IQR 31.5-85.5) to 84.5 (IQR 60.8-91.0) (<i>P</i> = 0.026). This did not change significantly after a transition to a virtual format of the team-based competition in 2021 (<i>P</i> = 0.146) and 2022 (<i>P</i> = 0.335). There was no significant relationship between the number of TrueLearn questions taken and ABSITE scores specifically before and after implementation of the team-based competition (AUC = 0.0002, Spearman's r (67) 0.064, <i>P</i> = 0.605). Furthermore, the team-based competition was well received by residents and was believed to be beneficial to their studying.DiscussionThe team-based competition is easy to implement and improves ABSITE performance through means other than encouraging residents to take more practice questions. The team-based competition is well-received by residents and may prove beneficial to board examination preparation and pass rates.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7782,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Surgeon\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"933-939\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Surgeon\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00031348251318381\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Surgeon","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00031348251318381","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:美国外科委员会(ABS)培训考试(ABSITE)分数是通过ABS资格考试的预测指标,已成为住院医师教育成功的标志。一个竞争性的团队为基础的方法,鼓励自学和教学参与是ABSITE准备的一种新方法。我们的目的是确定这种方法是否能显著提高居民在ABSITE上的百分位数表现。方法:采用购买在线题库(TrueLearn LLC, Mooresville, NC)、以团队为基础的竞赛和以团队为基础的虚拟形式的竞赛,前后比较ABSITE百分位分数的回顾性分析。结果:项目水平ABSITE中位数从2011年的40.0 (IQR 21.0-67.0)上升到2022年的77.0 (IQR 60.0-91.0) (P < 0.0001)。实施团队竞赛后,ABSITE中位数从67.0 (IQR 31.5-85.5)显著上升至84.5 (IQR 60.8-91.0) (P = 0.026)。在2021年(P = 0.146)和2022年(P = 0.335)过渡到以团队为基础的虚拟形式后,这一情况没有明显变化。在实施团队竞赛前后,TrueLearn的出题数与ABSITE分数之间没有显著关系(AUC = 0.0002, Spearman’s r (67) 0.064, P = 0.605)。此外,这个以团队为基础的比赛受到居民的欢迎,并认为对他们的学习有益。讨论:以团队为基础的竞赛易于实施,并通过鼓励居民多做练习题以外的方式提高ABSITE的绩效。这项以团队为基础的比赛受到居民的欢迎,并可能有助于委员会考试的准备和通过率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Competitive Edge: Improving American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination Scores Through a Team-Based Competition.

BackgroundThe American Board of Surgery (ABS) In-Training Examination (ABSITE) scores are predictive of passing the ABS qualifying exam and have become a marker of residency education success. A competitive team-based approach to encourage self-studying and didactic participation is a novel method of ABSITE preparation. We aimed to determine if this method significantly improves residents' percentile performances on the ABSITE.MethodsRetrospective review of ABSITE percentile scores were compared before and after implementation of a purchased online question bank (TrueLearn LLC, Mooresville, NC), a team-based competition, and a virtual format of the team-based competition.ResultsThe median ABSITE percentile at the program level increased from 40.0 (IQR 21.0-67.0) in 2011 to 77.0 by 2022 (IQR 60.0-91.0) (P < 0.0001). After implementation of the team-based competition, ABSITE median percentile rose significantly from 67.0 (IQR 31.5-85.5) to 84.5 (IQR 60.8-91.0) (P = 0.026). This did not change significantly after a transition to a virtual format of the team-based competition in 2021 (P = 0.146) and 2022 (P = 0.335). There was no significant relationship between the number of TrueLearn questions taken and ABSITE scores specifically before and after implementation of the team-based competition (AUC = 0.0002, Spearman's r (67) 0.064, P = 0.605). Furthermore, the team-based competition was well received by residents and was believed to be beneficial to their studying.DiscussionThe team-based competition is easy to implement and improves ABSITE performance through means other than encouraging residents to take more practice questions. The team-based competition is well-received by residents and may prove beneficial to board examination preparation and pass rates.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American Surgeon
American Surgeon 医学-外科
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
623
期刊介绍: The American Surgeon is a monthly peer-reviewed publication published by the Southeastern Surgical Congress. Its area of concentration is clinical general surgery, as defined by the content areas of the American Board of Surgery: alimentary tract (including bariatric surgery), abdomen and its contents, breast, skin and soft tissue, endocrine system, solid organ transplantation, pediatric surgery, surgical critical care, surgical oncology (including head and neck surgery), trauma and emergency surgery, and vascular surgery.
期刊最新文献
The Operation that Saved a Future King: Henry V from Shrewsbury to Agincourt. Letter re: Reply to the Letter to the Editor: "Can American Board of Surgery in Training Examinations Be Passed by Large Language Models? Comparative Assessment of Gemini, Copilot, and ChatGPT". An Explorative Cross-Sectional Study Using Patient-Reported Outcome Measures to Assess How Food Insecurity Impacts Eating-Related Behavior, Distress, and Symptoms for Patients Considering Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery. Simple Postoperative Markers for Early Identification of Low-Risk Patients After Gastric or Colorectal Cancer Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study. The Role of Ligation in Portal Vein Trauma: A Historical Case Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1