手术肥胖和代谢手术(PSPOSO)的端口位置和结果清单:基于套管针数量和位置的证据评估的新报告清单。

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Obesity Surgery Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-04 DOI:10.1007/s11695-025-07694-y
Mohamed H Zidan, Hassan El-Masry, Ahmed Amgad, Hashem Altabbaa, Marwan Emad Abdou, Samar A Amer, Nour Zayed, Haidy Osama Ismail, Mohammed Alokl, Ahmed Abokhozima
{"title":"手术肥胖和代谢手术(PSPOSO)的端口位置和结果清单:基于套管针数量和位置的证据评估的新报告清单。","authors":"Mohamed H Zidan, Hassan El-Masry, Ahmed Amgad, Hashem Altabbaa, Marwan Emad Abdou, Samar A Amer, Nour Zayed, Haidy Osama Ismail, Mohammed Alokl, Ahmed Abokhozima","doi":"10.1007/s11695-025-07694-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Since the early 1980s, efforts to standardize ergonomic practices in laparoscopic surgeries have aimed to improve procedural efficiency and reduce complications, but clinical validation remains limited. In metabolic and bariatric surgeries (MBS), innovations in trocar site placements, driven by the popularity of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG), have advanced surgical techniques. However, practices often vary based on individual surgeon preferences rather than standardized evidence-based criteria. This study introduces the Port Site Placement and Outcomes for Surgical Obesity and Metabolic Surgeries (PSPOSO) checklist, aiming to standardize port placements and improve reporting consistency. A systematic review and meta-analysis of LSG studies were conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Data were extracted from 34 studies involving 7173 cases. Key variables included port configurations, manipulation angles, and outcomes such as operative time and excess weight loss percentage (EWL%). Innovative methods were used to estimate manipulation and azimuth angles from available intraoperative images. Statistical analyses and meta-regression were performed to identify associations between port configurations and surgical outcomes. Findings revealed substantial variability in port placements, with no significant effect of manipulation angles or port numbers on operative time or EWL% at 6, 12, and 24 months (p-values > 0.05). High residual heterogeneity suggests that factors beyond manipulation angles and port counts contribute to outcome variability. The PSPOSO checklist provides a framework for standardizing port placement and ergonomic parameters in MBS, enhancing reproducibility and safety. Future studies should validate the checklist across diverse clinical settings to refine surgical approaches and improve patient outcomes. PROSPERO: CRD42024598674.</p>","PeriodicalId":19460,"journal":{"name":"Obesity Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"1086-1108"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11906533/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Port Site Placement and Outcomes for Surgical Obesity and Metabolic Surgeries (PSPOSO) Checklist: A New Reporting Checklist Based on Evidential Assessment of the Number of Trocars and Positions.\",\"authors\":\"Mohamed H Zidan, Hassan El-Masry, Ahmed Amgad, Hashem Altabbaa, Marwan Emad Abdou, Samar A Amer, Nour Zayed, Haidy Osama Ismail, Mohammed Alokl, Ahmed Abokhozima\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11695-025-07694-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Since the early 1980s, efforts to standardize ergonomic practices in laparoscopic surgeries have aimed to improve procedural efficiency and reduce complications, but clinical validation remains limited. In metabolic and bariatric surgeries (MBS), innovations in trocar site placements, driven by the popularity of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG), have advanced surgical techniques. However, practices often vary based on individual surgeon preferences rather than standardized evidence-based criteria. This study introduces the Port Site Placement and Outcomes for Surgical Obesity and Metabolic Surgeries (PSPOSO) checklist, aiming to standardize port placements and improve reporting consistency. A systematic review and meta-analysis of LSG studies were conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Data were extracted from 34 studies involving 7173 cases. Key variables included port configurations, manipulation angles, and outcomes such as operative time and excess weight loss percentage (EWL%). Innovative methods were used to estimate manipulation and azimuth angles from available intraoperative images. Statistical analyses and meta-regression were performed to identify associations between port configurations and surgical outcomes. Findings revealed substantial variability in port placements, with no significant effect of manipulation angles or port numbers on operative time or EWL% at 6, 12, and 24 months (p-values > 0.05). High residual heterogeneity suggests that factors beyond manipulation angles and port counts contribute to outcome variability. The PSPOSO checklist provides a framework for standardizing port placement and ergonomic parameters in MBS, enhancing reproducibility and safety. Future studies should validate the checklist across diverse clinical settings to refine surgical approaches and improve patient outcomes. PROSPERO: CRD42024598674.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19460,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Obesity Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1086-1108\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11906533/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Obesity Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-025-07694-y\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obesity Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-025-07694-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自20世纪80年代初以来,在腹腔镜手术中标准化人体工程学实践的努力旨在提高手术效率和减少并发症,但临床验证仍然有限。在代谢和减肥手术(MBS)中,由于腹腔镜袖式胃切除术(LSG)的普及,套管针位置的创新具有先进的手术技术。然而,实践往往根据个别外科医生的喜好而不是标准化的循证标准而变化。本研究引入了外科肥胖和代谢手术(PSPOSO)的港口位置和结果清单,旨在规范港口位置和提高报告的一致性。根据PRISMA指南对LSG研究进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析。数据来自34项研究,涉及7173例病例。关键变量包括端口配置、操作角度和结果,如手术时间和超重减重百分比(EWL%)。创新的方法用于估计操作和方位角从可用的术中图像。进行统计分析和meta回归以确定端口配置与手术结果之间的关联。研究结果显示,在6、12和24个月时,操作角度或端口数对手术时间或EWL%没有显著影响(p值> 0.05)。高残差异质性表明,操作角度和端口数以外的因素有助于结果的可变性。PSPOSO清单为MBS中端口放置和人体工程学参数的标准化提供了框架,提高了可重复性和安全性。未来的研究应该在不同的临床环境中验证检查表,以改进手术方法和改善患者的预后。普洛斯彼罗:CRD42024598674。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Port Site Placement and Outcomes for Surgical Obesity and Metabolic Surgeries (PSPOSO) Checklist: A New Reporting Checklist Based on Evidential Assessment of the Number of Trocars and Positions.

Since the early 1980s, efforts to standardize ergonomic practices in laparoscopic surgeries have aimed to improve procedural efficiency and reduce complications, but clinical validation remains limited. In metabolic and bariatric surgeries (MBS), innovations in trocar site placements, driven by the popularity of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG), have advanced surgical techniques. However, practices often vary based on individual surgeon preferences rather than standardized evidence-based criteria. This study introduces the Port Site Placement and Outcomes for Surgical Obesity and Metabolic Surgeries (PSPOSO) checklist, aiming to standardize port placements and improve reporting consistency. A systematic review and meta-analysis of LSG studies were conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Data were extracted from 34 studies involving 7173 cases. Key variables included port configurations, manipulation angles, and outcomes such as operative time and excess weight loss percentage (EWL%). Innovative methods were used to estimate manipulation and azimuth angles from available intraoperative images. Statistical analyses and meta-regression were performed to identify associations between port configurations and surgical outcomes. Findings revealed substantial variability in port placements, with no significant effect of manipulation angles or port numbers on operative time or EWL% at 6, 12, and 24 months (p-values > 0.05). High residual heterogeneity suggests that factors beyond manipulation angles and port counts contribute to outcome variability. The PSPOSO checklist provides a framework for standardizing port placement and ergonomic parameters in MBS, enhancing reproducibility and safety. Future studies should validate the checklist across diverse clinical settings to refine surgical approaches and improve patient outcomes. PROSPERO: CRD42024598674.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Obesity Surgery
Obesity Surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
24.10%
发文量
567
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Obesity Surgery is the official journal of the International Federation for the Surgery of Obesity and metabolic disorders (IFSO). A journal for bariatric/metabolic surgeons, Obesity Surgery provides an international, interdisciplinary forum for communicating the latest research, surgical and laparoscopic techniques, for treatment of massive obesity and metabolic disorders. Topics covered include original research, clinical reports, current status, guidelines, historical notes, invited commentaries, letters to the editor, medicolegal issues, meeting abstracts, modern surgery/technical innovations, new concepts, reviews, scholarly presentations and opinions. Obesity Surgery benefits surgeons performing obesity/metabolic surgery, general surgeons and surgical residents, endoscopists, anesthetists, support staff, nurses, dietitians, psychiatrists, psychologists, plastic surgeons, internists including endocrinologists and diabetologists, nutritional scientists, and those dealing with eating disorders.
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of the Allurion® Gastric Balloon in 300 Patients from a Single Metabolic Center in Ecuador : Gastric Balloon in Ecuador - Efficacy & Safety. Laparoscopic Transcystic Common Bile Duct Exploration for the Treatment of Choledocholithiasis Following Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass. Laparoscopic Greater Curvature Plication versus Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty: A Comparative Analysis of Outcomes at a Single Center. Effects of Hybrid-Type Multicomponent Exercise Training on Cardiopulmonary Capacity, Resting Metabolic Rate, and Muscle Strength Following Bariatric Surgery. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass with the Maestro™ System: a Novel Collaborative Robotic Platform.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1