腹腔镜和机器人袖胃切除术中钉线加固围手术期结果:一项284,580例患者的MBSAQIP队列研究

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Obesity Surgery Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-04 DOI:10.1007/s11695-025-07727-6
Sebastian Leon, Armaun D Rouhi, Sara P Ginzberg, Juan E Perez, Colleen M Tewksbury, Victoria M Gershuni, Maria S Altieri, Noel N Williams, Kristoffel R Dumon
{"title":"腹腔镜和机器人袖胃切除术中钉线加固围手术期结果:一项284,580例患者的MBSAQIP队列研究","authors":"Sebastian Leon, Armaun D Rouhi, Sara P Ginzberg, Juan E Perez, Colleen M Tewksbury, Victoria M Gershuni, Maria S Altieri, Noel N Williams, Kristoffel R Dumon","doi":"10.1007/s11695-025-07727-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study evaluated the association between staple line reinforcement (SLR) and 30-day outcomes in patients undergoing laparoscopic (LSG) or robotic sleeve gastrectomy (RSG).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adults undergoing primary LSG or RSG with and without SLR were analyzed from the 2018-2019 Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement (MBSAQIP) database. Baseline characteristic differences by SLR status for LSG and RSG were adjusted using entropy balancing. Multivariable weighted logistic and linear regression was then performed to examine the association between SLR and primary and secondary outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 284,580 patients, 88.6% (n = 252,035) had LSG and 11.4% (n = 32,545) had RSG, of which 63.7% (n = 160,545) and 50.8% (n = 16,541) had SLR, respectively. Compared to LSG and RSG without SLR, both LSG and RSG with SLR encountered higher adjusted odds of emergency department visit (AOR 1.08, 95%CI 1.03-1.10, p < 0.001; AOR 1.10, 95%CI 1.01-1.20, p = 0.029, respectively) as well as lower adjusted odds of leakage (AOR 0.85, 95%CI 0.76-0.94, p = 0.002; AOR 0.71, 95%CI 0.54-0.92, p = 0.011, respectively) and gastrointestinal bleeding (AOR 0.79, 95%CI 0.77-0.91, p < 0.001; AOR 0.77, 95%CI 0.70-0.84, p < 0.001, respectively). LSG with SLR was also associated with greater odds of unplanned intubation (AOR 1.52, 95%CI 1.16-1.99, p = 0.002) and mechanical ventilation (AOR 1.74, 95%CI 1.22-2.50, p = 0.002). RSG with SLR was associated with higher odds of intraoperative conversion (AOR 1.71, 95%CI 1.15-2.54, p = 0.008), and lower odds of acute renal failure (AOR 0.27, 95%CI 0.11-0.65, p = 0.003).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This entropy-balanced analysis of the MBSAQIP registry demonstrated an overall association between SLR and lower postoperative leakage and bleeding after RSG and LSG.</p>","PeriodicalId":19460,"journal":{"name":"Obesity Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"992-1000"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perioperative Outcomes of Staple Line Reinforcement During Laparoscopic and Robotic Sleeve Gastrectomy: An MBSAQIP Cohort Study of 284,580 Patients.\",\"authors\":\"Sebastian Leon, Armaun D Rouhi, Sara P Ginzberg, Juan E Perez, Colleen M Tewksbury, Victoria M Gershuni, Maria S Altieri, Noel N Williams, Kristoffel R Dumon\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11695-025-07727-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study evaluated the association between staple line reinforcement (SLR) and 30-day outcomes in patients undergoing laparoscopic (LSG) or robotic sleeve gastrectomy (RSG).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adults undergoing primary LSG or RSG with and without SLR were analyzed from the 2018-2019 Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement (MBSAQIP) database. Baseline characteristic differences by SLR status for LSG and RSG were adjusted using entropy balancing. Multivariable weighted logistic and linear regression was then performed to examine the association between SLR and primary and secondary outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 284,580 patients, 88.6% (n = 252,035) had LSG and 11.4% (n = 32,545) had RSG, of which 63.7% (n = 160,545) and 50.8% (n = 16,541) had SLR, respectively. Compared to LSG and RSG without SLR, both LSG and RSG with SLR encountered higher adjusted odds of emergency department visit (AOR 1.08, 95%CI 1.03-1.10, p < 0.001; AOR 1.10, 95%CI 1.01-1.20, p = 0.029, respectively) as well as lower adjusted odds of leakage (AOR 0.85, 95%CI 0.76-0.94, p = 0.002; AOR 0.71, 95%CI 0.54-0.92, p = 0.011, respectively) and gastrointestinal bleeding (AOR 0.79, 95%CI 0.77-0.91, p < 0.001; AOR 0.77, 95%CI 0.70-0.84, p < 0.001, respectively). LSG with SLR was also associated with greater odds of unplanned intubation (AOR 1.52, 95%CI 1.16-1.99, p = 0.002) and mechanical ventilation (AOR 1.74, 95%CI 1.22-2.50, p = 0.002). RSG with SLR was associated with higher odds of intraoperative conversion (AOR 1.71, 95%CI 1.15-2.54, p = 0.008), and lower odds of acute renal failure (AOR 0.27, 95%CI 0.11-0.65, p = 0.003).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This entropy-balanced analysis of the MBSAQIP registry demonstrated an overall association between SLR and lower postoperative leakage and bleeding after RSG and LSG.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19460,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Obesity Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"992-1000\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Obesity Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-025-07727-6\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obesity Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-025-07727-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本研究评估了腹腔镜(LSG)或机器人袖胃切除术(RSG)患者的钉线加固(SLR)与30天预后之间的关系。方法:从2018-2019年代谢与减肥手术认证与质量改进(MBSAQIP)数据库中分析合并或不合并SLR的原发性LSG或RSG成人。采用熵平衡法调整LSG和RSG的SLR状态基线特征差异。然后进行多变量加权逻辑回归和线性回归来检验SLR与主要和次要结局之间的关系。结果:284,580例患者中,88.6% (n = 252,035)为LSG, 11.4% (n = 32,545)为RSG,其中63.7% (n = 160545)为SLR, 50.8% (n = 16,541)为SLR。与LSG和没有SLR的RSG相比,LSG和有SLR的RSG都有更高的急诊就诊调整几率(AOR 1.08, 95%CI 1.03-1.10, p)。结论:MBSAQIP注册表的熵平衡分析表明,RSG和LSG术后SLR与较低的术后漏出血之间存在总体关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Perioperative Outcomes of Staple Line Reinforcement During Laparoscopic and Robotic Sleeve Gastrectomy: An MBSAQIP Cohort Study of 284,580 Patients.

Background: This study evaluated the association between staple line reinforcement (SLR) and 30-day outcomes in patients undergoing laparoscopic (LSG) or robotic sleeve gastrectomy (RSG).

Methods: Adults undergoing primary LSG or RSG with and without SLR were analyzed from the 2018-2019 Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement (MBSAQIP) database. Baseline characteristic differences by SLR status for LSG and RSG were adjusted using entropy balancing. Multivariable weighted logistic and linear regression was then performed to examine the association between SLR and primary and secondary outcomes.

Results: Of 284,580 patients, 88.6% (n = 252,035) had LSG and 11.4% (n = 32,545) had RSG, of which 63.7% (n = 160,545) and 50.8% (n = 16,541) had SLR, respectively. Compared to LSG and RSG without SLR, both LSG and RSG with SLR encountered higher adjusted odds of emergency department visit (AOR 1.08, 95%CI 1.03-1.10, p < 0.001; AOR 1.10, 95%CI 1.01-1.20, p = 0.029, respectively) as well as lower adjusted odds of leakage (AOR 0.85, 95%CI 0.76-0.94, p = 0.002; AOR 0.71, 95%CI 0.54-0.92, p = 0.011, respectively) and gastrointestinal bleeding (AOR 0.79, 95%CI 0.77-0.91, p < 0.001; AOR 0.77, 95%CI 0.70-0.84, p < 0.001, respectively). LSG with SLR was also associated with greater odds of unplanned intubation (AOR 1.52, 95%CI 1.16-1.99, p = 0.002) and mechanical ventilation (AOR 1.74, 95%CI 1.22-2.50, p = 0.002). RSG with SLR was associated with higher odds of intraoperative conversion (AOR 1.71, 95%CI 1.15-2.54, p = 0.008), and lower odds of acute renal failure (AOR 0.27, 95%CI 0.11-0.65, p = 0.003).

Conclusions: This entropy-balanced analysis of the MBSAQIP registry demonstrated an overall association between SLR and lower postoperative leakage and bleeding after RSG and LSG.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Obesity Surgery
Obesity Surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
24.10%
发文量
567
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Obesity Surgery is the official journal of the International Federation for the Surgery of Obesity and metabolic disorders (IFSO). A journal for bariatric/metabolic surgeons, Obesity Surgery provides an international, interdisciplinary forum for communicating the latest research, surgical and laparoscopic techniques, for treatment of massive obesity and metabolic disorders. Topics covered include original research, clinical reports, current status, guidelines, historical notes, invited commentaries, letters to the editor, medicolegal issues, meeting abstracts, modern surgery/technical innovations, new concepts, reviews, scholarly presentations and opinions. Obesity Surgery benefits surgeons performing obesity/metabolic surgery, general surgeons and surgical residents, endoscopists, anesthetists, support staff, nurses, dietitians, psychiatrists, psychologists, plastic surgeons, internists including endocrinologists and diabetologists, nutritional scientists, and those dealing with eating disorders.
期刊最新文献
Impact of Weight Bias, Stigma and Discrimination on Physical, Mental, and Quality of Life Outcomes of Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery: A Systematic Review. The Effect of Acute Aerobic Exercise On the Time Spent in Hypoglycaemia After Bariatric Surgery (The BariEX Study). Predictability of Same-Day Discharge Candidacy After Bariatric Surgery with Machine Learning. Correction: Machine Learning Prediction Models for Weight Loss Outcomes after Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Food Consumption by Processing Levels in Adults Two or More Years After Sleeve Gastrectomy: Associations with Surgical Outcomes and Eating Behaviors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1