Crg Torres, M C Mailart, Dms Ávila, Arcm Barbosa, Rfa Pinatti, S R Lopes, Tma Santos, S E Moecke, R Di Nicoló, A B Borges
{"title":"玻璃离子黏结剂对氧化锆牙冠临床成功率的影响:随机临床试验。","authors":"Crg Torres, M C Mailart, Dms Ávila, Arcm Barbosa, Rfa Pinatti, S R Lopes, Tma Santos, S E Moecke, R Di Nicoló, A B Borges","doi":"10.2341/24-066-C","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study evaluated the influence of two types of glass ionomer-based luting agent on the clinical performance of metal-free zirconia crowns.</p><p><strong>Methods and materials: </strong>Thirty participants received two full crown restorations in either anterior or posterior teeth, in a split-mouth design. After tooth preparation, impressions with addition-cured silicone were made and casts were obtained. The casts were scanned and 3Y-TZP zirconia copings (Ceramill ZI - Amann Girrbach) were milled using a CAD/CAM system. Glass ceramic (IPS E.max Ceram, Ivoclar Vivadent) was used to create the crown shape. For each participant, one crown was cemented using a conventional glass ionomer (GIC - Meron, Voco), while the other received a resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC - Meron Plus QM, Voco). The restorations were evaluated by two calibrated examiners after seven days, one year, and two years. The parameters at each evaluated time were analyzed by the Fisher exact test (α=0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At two years postoperatively, 24 participants attended the recall, and 46 (76.67%) restorations were evaluated. No fractures or secondary caries were diagnosed. Minimal marginal staining was verified in both cements. During the follow-up period, only two anterior crowns cemented with conventional glass ionomer showed loss of retention. No loss of retention was detected in posterior crowns.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>After two years of intraoral service, the crowns cemented with either conventional glass ionomer cement or resin-modified glass ionomer presented acceptable and similar clinical performance for all parameters analyzed in both anterior and posterior teeth.</p>","PeriodicalId":19502,"journal":{"name":"Operative dentistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence of Glass Ionomer-based Luting Cements on the Clinical Success of Zirconia Crowns: Randomized Clinical Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Crg Torres, M C Mailart, Dms Ávila, Arcm Barbosa, Rfa Pinatti, S R Lopes, Tma Santos, S E Moecke, R Di Nicoló, A B Borges\",\"doi\":\"10.2341/24-066-C\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study evaluated the influence of two types of glass ionomer-based luting agent on the clinical performance of metal-free zirconia crowns.</p><p><strong>Methods and materials: </strong>Thirty participants received two full crown restorations in either anterior or posterior teeth, in a split-mouth design. After tooth preparation, impressions with addition-cured silicone were made and casts were obtained. The casts were scanned and 3Y-TZP zirconia copings (Ceramill ZI - Amann Girrbach) were milled using a CAD/CAM system. Glass ceramic (IPS E.max Ceram, Ivoclar Vivadent) was used to create the crown shape. For each participant, one crown was cemented using a conventional glass ionomer (GIC - Meron, Voco), while the other received a resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC - Meron Plus QM, Voco). The restorations were evaluated by two calibrated examiners after seven days, one year, and two years. The parameters at each evaluated time were analyzed by the Fisher exact test (α=0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At two years postoperatively, 24 participants attended the recall, and 46 (76.67%) restorations were evaluated. No fractures or secondary caries were diagnosed. Minimal marginal staining was verified in both cements. During the follow-up period, only two anterior crowns cemented with conventional glass ionomer showed loss of retention. No loss of retention was detected in posterior crowns.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>After two years of intraoral service, the crowns cemented with either conventional glass ionomer cement or resin-modified glass ionomer presented acceptable and similar clinical performance for all parameters analyzed in both anterior and posterior teeth.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19502,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Operative dentistry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Operative dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2341/24-066-C\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Operative dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2341/24-066-C","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Influence of Glass Ionomer-based Luting Cements on the Clinical Success of Zirconia Crowns: Randomized Clinical Trial.
Objective: This study evaluated the influence of two types of glass ionomer-based luting agent on the clinical performance of metal-free zirconia crowns.
Methods and materials: Thirty participants received two full crown restorations in either anterior or posterior teeth, in a split-mouth design. After tooth preparation, impressions with addition-cured silicone were made and casts were obtained. The casts were scanned and 3Y-TZP zirconia copings (Ceramill ZI - Amann Girrbach) were milled using a CAD/CAM system. Glass ceramic (IPS E.max Ceram, Ivoclar Vivadent) was used to create the crown shape. For each participant, one crown was cemented using a conventional glass ionomer (GIC - Meron, Voco), while the other received a resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC - Meron Plus QM, Voco). The restorations were evaluated by two calibrated examiners after seven days, one year, and two years. The parameters at each evaluated time were analyzed by the Fisher exact test (α=0.05).
Results: At two years postoperatively, 24 participants attended the recall, and 46 (76.67%) restorations were evaluated. No fractures or secondary caries were diagnosed. Minimal marginal staining was verified in both cements. During the follow-up period, only two anterior crowns cemented with conventional glass ionomer showed loss of retention. No loss of retention was detected in posterior crowns.
Conclusion: After two years of intraoral service, the crowns cemented with either conventional glass ionomer cement or resin-modified glass ionomer presented acceptable and similar clinical performance for all parameters analyzed in both anterior and posterior teeth.
期刊介绍:
Operative Dentistry is a refereed, international journal published bi-monthly and distributed to subscribers in over 50 countries. In 2012, we printed 84 articles (672 pages). Papers were submitted by authors from 45 countries, in the categories of Clinical Research, Laboratory Research, Clinical Techniques/Case Presentations and Invited Papers, as well as Editorials and Abstracts.
One of the strong points of our journal is that our current publication time for accepted manuscripts is 4 to 6 months from the date of submission. Clinical Techniques/Case Presentations have a very quick turnaround time, which allows for very rapid publication of clinical based concepts. We also provide color for those papers that would benefit from its use.
The journal does not accept any advertising but you will find postings for faculty positions. Additionally, the journal also does not rent, sell or otherwise allow its subscriber list to be used by any other entity