IF 1.7 2区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Journal of Endovascular Therapy Pub Date : 2025-02-05 DOI:10.1177/15266028251316375
Theodosios Bisdas, Neophytos Zambas, Marios Zertalis, George Kanellopoulos, Apostolos Roubelakis, Georgios P Georghiou, Stylianos Pappas, Panagiotis Theodoridis, Christos Dimopoulos, Nikolaos Iatrou, Nikolas Charalambous
{"title":"Early Experience With the Nexus Aortic Arch Endograft for Endovascular Treatment of Complex Aortic Arch Pathologies Beyond Standard Indications.","authors":"Theodosios Bisdas, Neophytos Zambas, Marios Zertalis, George Kanellopoulos, Apostolos Roubelakis, Georgios P Georghiou, Stylianos Pappas, Panagiotis Theodoridis, Christos Dimopoulos, Nikolaos Iatrou, Nikolas Charalambous","doi":"10.1177/15266028251316375","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Nexus stent graft offers a minimally-invasive option for treating aortic arch aneurysms (AArA). Despite strict instructions for use (IFU), it is sometimes applied in complex anatomies for patients who are surgically inoperable or unsuitable for other devices. This study evaluates outcomes in patients treated outside the IFU, providing real-world insights.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed patients treated with the Nexus endograft outside its IFU between January 2022 and August 2024. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebral events (MACCE) such as death, stroke, or myocardial infarction. Secondary endpoints included the reasons for outside-IFU implantation, technical success, any aortic-related adverse events and postoperative endoleaks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen patients underwent endovascular treatment for AArA outside IFU. Five (38.5%) had a post-type A dissection, 5 had de novo AArA (38.5%), and 3 (23%) lacked a landing zone in zones 1 to 3 of the aortic arch for thoracoabdominal aortic repair. Seven patients (54%) received the Nexus One device, while 6 (46%) received the Nexus Duo endograft. No perioperative MACCE occurred. Mean follow-up was 17 ± 12 months, with a 79% survival rate at 1 year. Primary reasons for outside IFU use included an inner ascending length <30 mm and a descending aortic diameter >40 mm in 46% of patients accordingly. Technical success was achieved in all cases. A type Ic endoleak (7%) due to aneurysmatic degeneration of the brachiocephalic artery was identified at 2 years. No further aortic-related adverse events were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Nexus endograft demonstrated a favorable safety profile and promising clinical outcomes at 1 year, even in patients treated outside IFU criteria, with high technical success and no evidence of stroke. Reassessment of certain IFU criteria could enhance the device's applicability.</p><p><strong>Clinical impact: </strong>Our findings highlight the potential for expanding the clinical use of the Nexus stent-graft beyond its current IFU, offering a safe and effective alternative for complex aortic arch anatomies. With high technical success and no perioperative cerebrovascular events, these results suggest that carefully selected patients who are otherwise ineligible for surgery may still benefit from endovascular repair. This study provides real-world evidence supporting the reconsideration of IFU criteria, potentially broadening treatment options. The innovation lies in demonstrating that even outside IFU conditions, the Nexus endograft maintains a strong safety profile, paving the way for more inclusive patient selection.</p>","PeriodicalId":50210,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Endovascular Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"15266028251316375"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Endovascular Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15266028251316375","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:Nexus 支架移植物为治疗主动脉弓动脉瘤(AArA)提供了一种微创选择。尽管有严格的使用说明(IFU),但它有时也用于解剖结构复杂、无法手术或不适合使用其他装置的患者。本研究评估了在 IFU 之外接受治疗的患者的疗效,提供了真实世界的见解:我们分析了 2022 年 1 月至 2024 年 8 月期间在 IFU 之外使用 Nexus 内植物治疗的患者。主要终点是主要不良心脑血管事件(MACCE)的发生率,如死亡、中风或心肌梗死。次要终点包括外部-IFU植入的原因、技术成功率、任何主动脉相关不良事件和术后内漏:13名患者接受了IFU外AArA血管内治疗。5名患者(38.5%)为A型夹层后患者,5名患者为新发AArA患者(38.5%),3名患者(23%)在主动脉弓1至3区缺乏胸腹主动脉修复的着床区。7 名患者(54%)接受了 Nexus One 装置,6 名患者(46%)接受了 Nexus Duo 内植物移植。围手术期未发生 MACCE。平均随访时间为 17 ± 12 个月,1 年存活率为 79%。使用外部 IFU 的主要原因包括 46% 的患者内升段长度为 40 毫米。所有病例都取得了技术成功。2年后发现了一个因肱动脉瘤变性引起的Ic型内漏(7%)。没有再发生与主动脉相关的不良事件:结论:Nexus内植物移植术的安全性良好,1年后的临床结果令人满意,即使是在不符合IFU标准的患者中也是如此,而且技术成功率高,无中风迹象。重新评估某些 IFU 标准可提高该设备的适用性:临床影响:我们的研究结果突出表明,Nexus 支架移植物的临床应用有可能扩大到目前的 IFU 以外,为复杂的主动脉弓解剖提供了一种安全有效的替代方案。由于技术成功率高且围手术期未发生脑血管事件,这些结果表明,经过精心挑选的不符合手术条件的患者仍可从血管内修复术中获益。这项研究提供了支持重新考虑 IFU 标准的真实证据,有可能扩大治疗选择范围。其创新之处在于证明了即使在IFU条件之外,Nexus内植物移植也能保持很高的安全性,从而为更广泛地选择患者铺平了道路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Early Experience With the Nexus Aortic Arch Endograft for Endovascular Treatment of Complex Aortic Arch Pathologies Beyond Standard Indications.

Background: The Nexus stent graft offers a minimally-invasive option for treating aortic arch aneurysms (AArA). Despite strict instructions for use (IFU), it is sometimes applied in complex anatomies for patients who are surgically inoperable or unsuitable for other devices. This study evaluates outcomes in patients treated outside the IFU, providing real-world insights.

Methods: We analyzed patients treated with the Nexus endograft outside its IFU between January 2022 and August 2024. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebral events (MACCE) such as death, stroke, or myocardial infarction. Secondary endpoints included the reasons for outside-IFU implantation, technical success, any aortic-related adverse events and postoperative endoleaks.

Results: Thirteen patients underwent endovascular treatment for AArA outside IFU. Five (38.5%) had a post-type A dissection, 5 had de novo AArA (38.5%), and 3 (23%) lacked a landing zone in zones 1 to 3 of the aortic arch for thoracoabdominal aortic repair. Seven patients (54%) received the Nexus One device, while 6 (46%) received the Nexus Duo endograft. No perioperative MACCE occurred. Mean follow-up was 17 ± 12 months, with a 79% survival rate at 1 year. Primary reasons for outside IFU use included an inner ascending length <30 mm and a descending aortic diameter >40 mm in 46% of patients accordingly. Technical success was achieved in all cases. A type Ic endoleak (7%) due to aneurysmatic degeneration of the brachiocephalic artery was identified at 2 years. No further aortic-related adverse events were reported.

Conclusions: The Nexus endograft demonstrated a favorable safety profile and promising clinical outcomes at 1 year, even in patients treated outside IFU criteria, with high technical success and no evidence of stroke. Reassessment of certain IFU criteria could enhance the device's applicability.

Clinical impact: Our findings highlight the potential for expanding the clinical use of the Nexus stent-graft beyond its current IFU, offering a safe and effective alternative for complex aortic arch anatomies. With high technical success and no perioperative cerebrovascular events, these results suggest that carefully selected patients who are otherwise ineligible for surgery may still benefit from endovascular repair. This study provides real-world evidence supporting the reconsideration of IFU criteria, potentially broadening treatment options. The innovation lies in demonstrating that even outside IFU conditions, the Nexus endograft maintains a strong safety profile, paving the way for more inclusive patient selection.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
15.40%
发文量
203
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Endovascular Therapy (formerly the Journal of Endovascular Surgery) was established in 1994 as a forum for all physicians, scientists, and allied healthcare professionals who are engaged or interested in peripheral endovascular techniques and technology. An official publication of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists (ISEVS), the Journal of Endovascular Therapy publishes peer-reviewed articles of interest to clinicians and researchers in the field of peripheral endovascular interventions.
期刊最新文献
Electrosurgical In Situ Fenestration of Aortic Endograft. Videolaparoscopic-Guided Saccography and Direct Sac Embolization After Standard EVAR. In Vitro Investigation of Microcatheter Behavior During Microsphere Injection in Transarterial Radioembolization. Gore Tag Thoracic Branch Endoprosthesis in Acute Aortic Syndromes: A Case Series. Radiographic Characterization of Inferior Vena Cava and Its Reaction Following Filter Placement: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1