Xiaoye Li, Jiefu Fan, Lei Zhang, Chao Song, Hao Zhang, Shibo Xia, Haiyan Li, Qingsheng Lu
{"title":"Castor 2区单支支架在胸主动脉内修复主动脉弓穿透性动脉粥样硬化性溃疡。","authors":"Xiaoye Li, Jiefu Fan, Lei Zhang, Chao Song, Hao Zhang, Shibo Xia, Haiyan Li, Qingsheng Lu","doi":"10.1177/15266028251315015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study evaluated the feasibility and safety of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for aortic arch penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer (PAU) using Castor single-branched stent-graft with zone 2 landing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between May 2020 and April 2022, a total of 25 aortic arch PAU patients were treated by TEVAR with Castor single-branched stent-graft. Outcomes included technical success, perioperative and follow-up morbidity and mortality, and patency of left subclavian artery (LSA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All patients had aortic arch PAU with intramural hematoma (IMH). The proximal landing zone for all patients was in zone 2, which was between the distal edge of the left common carotid artery and proximal edge of LSA, in all cases. Technical success was achieved in all cases. During hospitalization after the operation, 1 patient died of gastrointestinal bleeding, and 2 patients (8.0%) had ischemic stroke. At a median follow-up of 29 months (interquartile range [IQR], 24-30 months), 2 (8.0%) patients died, including 1 ischemic stroke and 1 hemorrhagic stroke. One patient (4.0%) had reintervention owing to retrograde type A aortic dissection (RTAD) 2 months after the operation, and was successfully treated with aortic root remodeling, ascending aorta and total aortic arch replacement and frozen elephant trunk procedure. No endoleak or LSA occlusion occurred. The maximal diameter of aorta at proximal (30.2±2.4 mm vs 31.2±3.0 mm; p>0.05) and distal (25.7±2.8 mm vs 24.5±2.3 mm; p>0.05) landing zone showed no significant difference before and after the operation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The TEVAR for aortic arch PAU using Castor single-branched stent-graft is a safe and efficient option with zone 2 landing.</p><p><strong>Clinical impact: </strong>For patients with diagnosis of PAU with IMH, TEVAR with Castor single-branched stent-graft presents low mid-term mortality and morbidity rate, which should be considered as an optimal option when proximal landing zone is insufficient and revascularization of left subclavian artery (LSA) is needed. With Castor single-branched stent-graft, LSA could be revascularized easily and accurately.</p>","PeriodicalId":50210,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Endovascular Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"15266028251315015"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair for Aortic Arch Penetrating Atherosclerotic Ulcer Using Castor Single-Branched Stent-Graft With Zone 2 Landing.\",\"authors\":\"Xiaoye Li, Jiefu Fan, Lei Zhang, Chao Song, Hao Zhang, Shibo Xia, Haiyan Li, Qingsheng Lu\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15266028251315015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study evaluated the feasibility and safety of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for aortic arch penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer (PAU) using Castor single-branched stent-graft with zone 2 landing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between May 2020 and April 2022, a total of 25 aortic arch PAU patients were treated by TEVAR with Castor single-branched stent-graft. Outcomes included technical success, perioperative and follow-up morbidity and mortality, and patency of left subclavian artery (LSA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All patients had aortic arch PAU with intramural hematoma (IMH). The proximal landing zone for all patients was in zone 2, which was between the distal edge of the left common carotid artery and proximal edge of LSA, in all cases. Technical success was achieved in all cases. During hospitalization after the operation, 1 patient died of gastrointestinal bleeding, and 2 patients (8.0%) had ischemic stroke. At a median follow-up of 29 months (interquartile range [IQR], 24-30 months), 2 (8.0%) patients died, including 1 ischemic stroke and 1 hemorrhagic stroke. One patient (4.0%) had reintervention owing to retrograde type A aortic dissection (RTAD) 2 months after the operation, and was successfully treated with aortic root remodeling, ascending aorta and total aortic arch replacement and frozen elephant trunk procedure. No endoleak or LSA occlusion occurred. The maximal diameter of aorta at proximal (30.2±2.4 mm vs 31.2±3.0 mm; p>0.05) and distal (25.7±2.8 mm vs 24.5±2.3 mm; p>0.05) landing zone showed no significant difference before and after the operation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The TEVAR for aortic arch PAU using Castor single-branched stent-graft is a safe and efficient option with zone 2 landing.</p><p><strong>Clinical impact: </strong>For patients with diagnosis of PAU with IMH, TEVAR with Castor single-branched stent-graft presents low mid-term mortality and morbidity rate, which should be considered as an optimal option when proximal landing zone is insufficient and revascularization of left subclavian artery (LSA) is needed. With Castor single-branched stent-graft, LSA could be revascularized easily and accurately.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50210,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Endovascular Therapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"15266028251315015\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Endovascular Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15266028251315015\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Endovascular Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15266028251315015","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:本研究评估了Castor单支支架2区着落治疗主动脉弓穿透性动脉粥样硬化性溃疡(PAU)的可行性和安全性。方法:于2020年5月至2022年4月,对25例主动脉弓PAU患者行TEVAR联合Castor单支支架移植治疗。结果包括技术成功,围手术期和随访的发病率和死亡率,左锁骨下动脉(LSA)通畅。结果:所有患者均有主动脉弓PAU合并壁内血肿(IMH)。所有患者的近端着陆区均在2区,位于左侧颈总动脉远端边缘与LSA近端边缘之间。在所有情况下都取得了技术上的成功。术后住院期间消化道出血死亡1例,缺血性脑卒中2例(8.0%)。中位随访29个月(四分位间距[IQR], 24-30个月),2例(8.0%)患者死亡,包括1例缺血性卒中和1例出血性卒中。1例(4.0%)术后2个月因逆行性A型主动脉夹层(RTAD)再次介入治疗,经主动脉根重塑、升主动脉及全主动脉弓置换术及冷冻象鼻手术治疗成功。未发生内漏或LSA阻塞。近端主动脉最大直径(30.2±2.4 mm vs 31.2±3.0 mm);P < 0.05)和远端(25.7±2.8 mm vs 24.5±2.3 mm;手术前后着陆区差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。结论:采用Castor单支支架植入TEVAR治疗主动脉弓PAU是一种安全有效的2区着陆选择。临床影响:对于诊断为PAU合并IMH的患者,TEVAR联合Castor单支支架移植中期死亡率和发病率较低,当近端着陆区不足,需要行左锁骨下动脉(LSA)血运重建时,应考虑TEVAR联合Castor单支支架移植是最佳选择。Castor单支支架可以方便、准确地重建LSA。
Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair for Aortic Arch Penetrating Atherosclerotic Ulcer Using Castor Single-Branched Stent-Graft With Zone 2 Landing.
Background: This study evaluated the feasibility and safety of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for aortic arch penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer (PAU) using Castor single-branched stent-graft with zone 2 landing.
Methods: Between May 2020 and April 2022, a total of 25 aortic arch PAU patients were treated by TEVAR with Castor single-branched stent-graft. Outcomes included technical success, perioperative and follow-up morbidity and mortality, and patency of left subclavian artery (LSA).
Results: All patients had aortic arch PAU with intramural hematoma (IMH). The proximal landing zone for all patients was in zone 2, which was between the distal edge of the left common carotid artery and proximal edge of LSA, in all cases. Technical success was achieved in all cases. During hospitalization after the operation, 1 patient died of gastrointestinal bleeding, and 2 patients (8.0%) had ischemic stroke. At a median follow-up of 29 months (interquartile range [IQR], 24-30 months), 2 (8.0%) patients died, including 1 ischemic stroke and 1 hemorrhagic stroke. One patient (4.0%) had reintervention owing to retrograde type A aortic dissection (RTAD) 2 months after the operation, and was successfully treated with aortic root remodeling, ascending aorta and total aortic arch replacement and frozen elephant trunk procedure. No endoleak or LSA occlusion occurred. The maximal diameter of aorta at proximal (30.2±2.4 mm vs 31.2±3.0 mm; p>0.05) and distal (25.7±2.8 mm vs 24.5±2.3 mm; p>0.05) landing zone showed no significant difference before and after the operation.
Conclusions: The TEVAR for aortic arch PAU using Castor single-branched stent-graft is a safe and efficient option with zone 2 landing.
Clinical impact: For patients with diagnosis of PAU with IMH, TEVAR with Castor single-branched stent-graft presents low mid-term mortality and morbidity rate, which should be considered as an optimal option when proximal landing zone is insufficient and revascularization of left subclavian artery (LSA) is needed. With Castor single-branched stent-graft, LSA could be revascularized easily and accurately.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Endovascular Therapy (formerly the Journal of Endovascular Surgery) was established in 1994 as a forum for all physicians, scientists, and allied healthcare professionals who are engaged or interested in peripheral endovascular techniques and technology. An official publication of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists (ISEVS), the Journal of Endovascular Therapy publishes peer-reviewed articles of interest to clinicians and researchers in the field of peripheral endovascular interventions.