生态数据揭示了由于两个人的社会互动而导致的人与人之间避碰的不平衡

IF 4.4 2区 工程技术 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-06 DOI:10.1016/j.trf.2025.01.039
Adrien Gregorj , Zeynep Yücel , Francesco Zanlungo , Takayuki Kanda
{"title":"生态数据揭示了由于两个人的社会互动而导致的人与人之间避碰的不平衡","authors":"Adrien Gregorj ,&nbsp;Zeynep Yücel ,&nbsp;Francesco Zanlungo ,&nbsp;Takayuki Kanda","doi":"10.1016/j.trf.2025.01.039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Humans navigate public spaces safely and smoothly using complex collision avoidance strategies. Traditional models of human–human collision avoidance often draw from physics, relying on repulsive forces, but the effect of social factors on these strategies is not well understood. This study examines frontal encounters between single pedestrians and two-person groups (dyads), investigating the contributions of each party to collision avoidance and the impact of social interaction within the group. Using an ecological dataset of pedestrian trajectories, we measured deviations from a straight path as a proxy for collision avoidance. Our findings reveal a systematic imbalance and significant effects of social interaction on collision avoidance. Single pedestrians tend to prioritise trajectory efficiency in undisturbed situations and are the primary contributors to avoidance during encounters, adjusting their paths according to the dyad's interaction level. For dyads, social interaction correlates with lower efficiency in undisturbed cases and reduced responsiveness during encounters. An analysis of the impact parameter further shows that collision risk influences path deviations: individuals demonstrate larger deviations in response to highly interactive dyads, both in high-risk and less critical encounters. For dyads, the difference in deviation between low and high interaction levels is most pronounced when the single pedestrian is on a near-collision course. These results deepen our understanding of human pedestrian navigation, illustrating dynamical and social implications of group dynamics.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48355,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour","volume":"109 ","pages":"Pages 1313-1333"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ecological data reveal imbalances in human–human collision avoidance due to dyads' social interaction\",\"authors\":\"Adrien Gregorj ,&nbsp;Zeynep Yücel ,&nbsp;Francesco Zanlungo ,&nbsp;Takayuki Kanda\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.trf.2025.01.039\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Humans navigate public spaces safely and smoothly using complex collision avoidance strategies. Traditional models of human–human collision avoidance often draw from physics, relying on repulsive forces, but the effect of social factors on these strategies is not well understood. This study examines frontal encounters between single pedestrians and two-person groups (dyads), investigating the contributions of each party to collision avoidance and the impact of social interaction within the group. Using an ecological dataset of pedestrian trajectories, we measured deviations from a straight path as a proxy for collision avoidance. Our findings reveal a systematic imbalance and significant effects of social interaction on collision avoidance. Single pedestrians tend to prioritise trajectory efficiency in undisturbed situations and are the primary contributors to avoidance during encounters, adjusting their paths according to the dyad's interaction level. For dyads, social interaction correlates with lower efficiency in undisturbed cases and reduced responsiveness during encounters. An analysis of the impact parameter further shows that collision risk influences path deviations: individuals demonstrate larger deviations in response to highly interactive dyads, both in high-risk and less critical encounters. For dyads, the difference in deviation between low and high interaction levels is most pronounced when the single pedestrian is on a near-collision course. These results deepen our understanding of human pedestrian navigation, illustrating dynamical and social implications of group dynamics.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48355,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour\",\"volume\":\"109 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 1313-1333\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369847825000373\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369847825000373","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人类使用复杂的避碰策略在公共空间中安全、平稳地航行。传统的人与人避碰模型通常基于物理学,依赖于排斥力,但社会因素对这些策略的影响尚未得到很好的理解。本研究考察了单人行人和双人组(二人组)的正面碰撞,调查了每一方对避免碰撞的贡献以及群体内社会互动的影响。使用行人轨迹的生态数据集,我们测量了从直线路径的偏差,作为避免碰撞的代理。我们的研究结果揭示了社会互动对避碰的系统性不平衡和显著影响。在不受干扰的情况下,单个行人倾向于优先考虑轨迹效率,并且是相遇时回避的主要贡献者,根据双行人的互动水平调整他们的路径。对于二人组来说,在不受干扰的情况下,社会互动与较低的效率相关,并且在遇到时反应性降低。对冲击参数的分析进一步表明,碰撞风险影响路径偏差:在高风险和不太关键的遭遇中,个体在对高度互动的二联体的反应中表现出更大的偏差。对于二人组来说,当单个行人处于接近碰撞的过程中时,低交互水平和高交互水平之间的偏差差异最为明显。这些结果加深了我们对人类行人导航的理解,说明了群体动力学的动力学和社会意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Ecological data reveal imbalances in human–human collision avoidance due to dyads' social interaction
Humans navigate public spaces safely and smoothly using complex collision avoidance strategies. Traditional models of human–human collision avoidance often draw from physics, relying on repulsive forces, but the effect of social factors on these strategies is not well understood. This study examines frontal encounters between single pedestrians and two-person groups (dyads), investigating the contributions of each party to collision avoidance and the impact of social interaction within the group. Using an ecological dataset of pedestrian trajectories, we measured deviations from a straight path as a proxy for collision avoidance. Our findings reveal a systematic imbalance and significant effects of social interaction on collision avoidance. Single pedestrians tend to prioritise trajectory efficiency in undisturbed situations and are the primary contributors to avoidance during encounters, adjusting their paths according to the dyad's interaction level. For dyads, social interaction correlates with lower efficiency in undisturbed cases and reduced responsiveness during encounters. An analysis of the impact parameter further shows that collision risk influences path deviations: individuals demonstrate larger deviations in response to highly interactive dyads, both in high-risk and less critical encounters. For dyads, the difference in deviation between low and high interaction levels is most pronounced when the single pedestrian is on a near-collision course. These results deepen our understanding of human pedestrian navigation, illustrating dynamical and social implications of group dynamics.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
14.60%
发文量
239
审稿时长
71 days
期刊介绍: Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour focuses on the behavioural and psychological aspects of traffic and transport. The aim of the journal is to enhance theory development, improve the quality of empirical studies and to stimulate the application of research findings in practice. TRF provides a focus and a means of communication for the considerable amount of research activities that are now being carried out in this field. The journal provides a forum for transportation researchers, psychologists, ergonomists, engineers and policy-makers with an interest in traffic and transport psychology.
期刊最新文献
Effects of augmented reality head-up displays and cognitive workload on takeovers in semi-automated driving A population-based survey of street racing and stunt driving during COVID-19 in Ontario, Canada: a test of the Person-Situation Interactionist Model Exploiting the benevolent machine: Psychological antecedents of human drivers' strategic exploitation intentions toward autonomous vehicles in mixed traffic Integrated training to improve young novice drivers' hazard management and speed management skills: a driving simulator study Motorcycle safety in Vietnam: Revising and expanding the MRBQ to reflect emerging urban risks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1