在物理治疗实习期间采用监督的指导模式:绘制英国学习者的经验

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION Physiotherapy Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-16 DOI:10.1016/j.physio.2025.101463
Sarah Smith , Simon Godley , Adele Anderson , Paul K. Miller
{"title":"在物理治疗实习期间采用监督的指导模式:绘制英国学习者的经验","authors":"Sarah Smith ,&nbsp;Simon Godley ,&nbsp;Adele Anderson ,&nbsp;Paul K. Miller","doi":"10.1016/j.physio.2025.101463","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>The UK government has moved to increase pre-qualification training places across all Allied Health Professions by 50%, without any reduction in quality of education. Universities and healthcare teams are therefore being asked to change their ways of working and consider alternative practice supervision models during placements. This study explores the experiences of pre-qualifying physiotherapy learners involved in a trial of one such model, a coaching and peer-learning approach. The work described assesses its facility as an augmentation to the traditional one-to-one clinical supervision model.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>A qualitative-thematic approach using semi-structured interviews was employed. Detailed, open-ended interviews were conducted in order to ascertain the nuanced experiences of participants involved in the trial.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>An intervention in multiple sites (both hospital inpatient and community care) within a single NHS trust, administered by a single UK university.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>Participants Seventeen pre-qualifying participants involved in the trial consented to be interviewed. Of these, 11 were final year undergraduate learners, and 6 were final year postgraduates, of which 12 identified as female and 5 identified as male..</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Analysis revealed four interconnected major themes: 1. Teamwork, Camaraderie and Hierarchical Tensions in Peer-Support; 2. Adapting to Leadership and Being Led; 3. Safety Nets versus Supervisors; 4. Fast Starts and Variable Endings in Learning and Experience.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion and implications</h3><div>The model was broadly well-received by participants, and ultimately gave rise to greater workplace confidence, with potential impact for capacity, though the nuanced outcomes of the research indicated contingencies around gradual assimilation and group dynamics that should be considered in future development.</div></div><div><h3>Contribution of the Paper</h3><div><ul><li><span>•</span><span><div>The coaching model of placement supervision was broadly well-received among learners, and has facility as a part of the expansion process in physiotherapy workforce development.</div></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><div>Freedom from the need for persistent clinical scrutiny can reduce the pressure on learners and also on practice educators.</div></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><div>Social dynamics in teams are not an arbitrary contingency but need to be a core feature of the design in any given case.</div></span></li></ul></div></div>","PeriodicalId":54608,"journal":{"name":"Physiotherapy","volume":"127 ","pages":"Article 101463"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Employing a coaching model of supervision during physiotherapy placements: charting the learner experience in England\",\"authors\":\"Sarah Smith ,&nbsp;Simon Godley ,&nbsp;Adele Anderson ,&nbsp;Paul K. Miller\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.physio.2025.101463\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>The UK government has moved to increase pre-qualification training places across all Allied Health Professions by 50%, without any reduction in quality of education. Universities and healthcare teams are therefore being asked to change their ways of working and consider alternative practice supervision models during placements. This study explores the experiences of pre-qualifying physiotherapy learners involved in a trial of one such model, a coaching and peer-learning approach. The work described assesses its facility as an augmentation to the traditional one-to-one clinical supervision model.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>A qualitative-thematic approach using semi-structured interviews was employed. Detailed, open-ended interviews were conducted in order to ascertain the nuanced experiences of participants involved in the trial.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>An intervention in multiple sites (both hospital inpatient and community care) within a single NHS trust, administered by a single UK university.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>Participants Seventeen pre-qualifying participants involved in the trial consented to be interviewed. Of these, 11 were final year undergraduate learners, and 6 were final year postgraduates, of which 12 identified as female and 5 identified as male..</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Analysis revealed four interconnected major themes: 1. Teamwork, Camaraderie and Hierarchical Tensions in Peer-Support; 2. Adapting to Leadership and Being Led; 3. Safety Nets versus Supervisors; 4. Fast Starts and Variable Endings in Learning and Experience.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion and implications</h3><div>The model was broadly well-received by participants, and ultimately gave rise to greater workplace confidence, with potential impact for capacity, though the nuanced outcomes of the research indicated contingencies around gradual assimilation and group dynamics that should be considered in future development.</div></div><div><h3>Contribution of the Paper</h3><div><ul><li><span>•</span><span><div>The coaching model of placement supervision was broadly well-received among learners, and has facility as a part of the expansion process in physiotherapy workforce development.</div></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><div>Freedom from the need for persistent clinical scrutiny can reduce the pressure on learners and also on practice educators.</div></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><div>Social dynamics in teams are not an arbitrary contingency but need to be a core feature of the design in any given case.</div></span></li></ul></div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54608,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physiotherapy\",\"volume\":\"127 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101463\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physiotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S003194062500001X\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/16 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S003194062500001X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

英国政府已采取行动,在不降低教育质量的前提下,将所有专职医疗职业的资格预审培训名额增加50%。因此,大学和医疗团队被要求改变他们的工作方式,并在实习期间考虑替代的实践监督模式。本研究探讨了预审资格的物理治疗学习者参与一个这样的模式,教练和同伴学习方法的试验的经验。工作描述评估其设施作为传统的一对一临床监督模式的增强。设计采用半结构化访谈的定性-主题方法。为了确定参与试验的参与者的细微体验,进行了详细的开放式访谈。在由一所英国大学管理的单一NHS信托内的多个地点(包括医院住院病人和社区护理)进行干预。参与试验的17名资格预审的参与者同意接受采访。其中,11人是本科最后一年的学习者,6人是研究生最后一年的学习者,其中12人是女性,5人是男性。同伴支持中的团队合作、同志情谊和等级关系2. 适应领导与被领导3. 安全网vs监督者;4. 学习和经验的快速开始和可变结束。结论和启示该模型受到了参与者的广泛欢迎,并最终提高了工作场所的信心,对能力有潜在的影响,尽管研究的细微差别结果表明,在未来的发展中应该考虑到逐渐同化和群体动态的偶然性。•安置监督的教练模式在学习者中广受欢迎,并作为物理治疗劳动力发展扩展过程的一部分。•不需要持续的临床审查可以减轻学习者和实践教育者的压力。•团队中的社交动态并不是一种随意的偶然性,而是在任何情况下都需要成为设计的核心特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Employing a coaching model of supervision during physiotherapy placements: charting the learner experience in England

Objectives

The UK government has moved to increase pre-qualification training places across all Allied Health Professions by 50%, without any reduction in quality of education. Universities and healthcare teams are therefore being asked to change their ways of working and consider alternative practice supervision models during placements. This study explores the experiences of pre-qualifying physiotherapy learners involved in a trial of one such model, a coaching and peer-learning approach. The work described assesses its facility as an augmentation to the traditional one-to-one clinical supervision model.

Design

A qualitative-thematic approach using semi-structured interviews was employed. Detailed, open-ended interviews were conducted in order to ascertain the nuanced experiences of participants involved in the trial.

Setting

An intervention in multiple sites (both hospital inpatient and community care) within a single NHS trust, administered by a single UK university.

Participants

Participants Seventeen pre-qualifying participants involved in the trial consented to be interviewed. Of these, 11 were final year undergraduate learners, and 6 were final year postgraduates, of which 12 identified as female and 5 identified as male..

Results

Analysis revealed four interconnected major themes: 1. Teamwork, Camaraderie and Hierarchical Tensions in Peer-Support; 2. Adapting to Leadership and Being Led; 3. Safety Nets versus Supervisors; 4. Fast Starts and Variable Endings in Learning and Experience.

Conclusion and implications

The model was broadly well-received by participants, and ultimately gave rise to greater workplace confidence, with potential impact for capacity, though the nuanced outcomes of the research indicated contingencies around gradual assimilation and group dynamics that should be considered in future development.

Contribution of the Paper

  • The coaching model of placement supervision was broadly well-received among learners, and has facility as a part of the expansion process in physiotherapy workforce development.
  • Freedom from the need for persistent clinical scrutiny can reduce the pressure on learners and also on practice educators.
  • Social dynamics in teams are not an arbitrary contingency but need to be a core feature of the design in any given case.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Physiotherapy
Physiotherapy 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
3.00%
发文量
377
审稿时长
82 days
期刊介绍: Physiotherapy aims to publish original research and facilitate continuing professional development for physiotherapists and other health professions worldwide. Dedicated to the advancement of physiotherapy through publication of research and scholarly work concerned with, but not limited to, its scientific basis and clinical application, education of practitioners, management of services and policy. We are pleased to receive articles reporting original scientific research, systematic reviews or meta-analyses, theoretical or debate articles, brief reports and technical reports. All papers should demonstrate methodological rigour.
期刊最新文献
Factors affecting mobility in the transition period from childhood to adolescence in cerebral palsy: A prospective longitudinal study Embedding physiotherapy in general practice: Global challenges, local solutions, and the role of First Contact Physiotherapy Exploring physiotherapists' role in work-focused health care and fit note use: Barriers, facilitators, and recommendations In neonates, how effective is lung ultrasonography in directing chest physiotherapy intervention when compared to the combination of chest x-ray and auscultation? The use of normal saline instillation as part of endotracheal suction in mechanically ventilated patients: A scoping review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1