血清甲状腺素、游离甲状腺素和促甲状腺素测定在甲状腺功能筛查中的比较评价。

Annals of clinical research Pub Date : 1988-01-01
P Nuutila, K Irjala, J Viikari, V P Prinssi, H L Kaihola
{"title":"血清甲状腺素、游离甲状腺素和促甲状腺素测定在甲状腺功能筛查中的比较评价。","authors":"P Nuutila,&nbsp;K Irjala,&nbsp;J Viikari,&nbsp;V P Prinssi,&nbsp;H L Kaihola","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We assessed a highly sensitive immunoradiometric thyrotropin (TSH) assay in screening thyroid dysfunction in 130 consecutive outpatients from a department of medicine and 224 patients from a municipal health centre. In addition to clinical examination, three routine tests were done: a thyroxine radioimmunoassay, an analogue-based free thyroxine assay and an immunoradiometric TSH assay. Triiodothyronine and the TRH test were done, if the findings were discrepant. Discrepancy existed in 24% of cases. The TSH assay had no false negative results (sensitivity 100%). Therefore TSH could screen all patients with thyroid dysfunction. Free thyroxine was the most specific assay (specificity 96%), but many subclinically or overtly hypothyroid patients would have been missed, if that assay had been used alone. We conclude that TSH(IRMA) is the best first-line measurement for thyroid dysfunction testing among outpatients. An abnormal TSH result alone is not diagnostic, but should be followed by the measurement of thyroxine or free thyroxine.</p>","PeriodicalId":8084,"journal":{"name":"Annals of clinical research","volume":"20 3","pages":"158-63"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1988-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative evaluation of serum thyroxine, free thyroxine and thyrotropin determinations in screening of thyroid function.\",\"authors\":\"P Nuutila,&nbsp;K Irjala,&nbsp;J Viikari,&nbsp;V P Prinssi,&nbsp;H L Kaihola\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>We assessed a highly sensitive immunoradiometric thyrotropin (TSH) assay in screening thyroid dysfunction in 130 consecutive outpatients from a department of medicine and 224 patients from a municipal health centre. In addition to clinical examination, three routine tests were done: a thyroxine radioimmunoassay, an analogue-based free thyroxine assay and an immunoradiometric TSH assay. Triiodothyronine and the TRH test were done, if the findings were discrepant. Discrepancy existed in 24% of cases. The TSH assay had no false negative results (sensitivity 100%). Therefore TSH could screen all patients with thyroid dysfunction. Free thyroxine was the most specific assay (specificity 96%), but many subclinically or overtly hypothyroid patients would have been missed, if that assay had been used alone. We conclude that TSH(IRMA) is the best first-line measurement for thyroid dysfunction testing among outpatients. An abnormal TSH result alone is not diagnostic, but should be followed by the measurement of thyroxine or free thyroxine.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8084,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of clinical research\",\"volume\":\"20 3\",\"pages\":\"158-63\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1988-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of clinical research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of clinical research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们评估了一种高度敏感的免疫放射促甲状腺素(TSH)测定在筛查甲状腺功能障碍中的作用,该检测包括来自内科的130名连续门诊患者和来自市卫生中心的224名患者。除临床检查外,还进行了三项常规检查:甲状腺素放射免疫测定、基于类似物的游离甲状腺素测定和免疫放射TSH测定。如果结果不一致,则进行三碘甲状腺原氨酸和TRH试验。24%的病例存在差异。TSH试验无假阴性结果(灵敏度100%)。因此TSH可筛查所有甲状腺功能障碍患者。游离甲状腺素是最特异性的检测方法(特异性96%),但如果单独使用该检测方法,许多亚临床或明显甲状腺功能减退的患者可能会被遗漏。我们认为TSH(IRMA)是门诊患者甲状腺功能障碍检测的最佳一线指标。单独的异常TSH结果不能诊断,但应随后测量甲状腺素或游离甲状腺素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparative evaluation of serum thyroxine, free thyroxine and thyrotropin determinations in screening of thyroid function.

We assessed a highly sensitive immunoradiometric thyrotropin (TSH) assay in screening thyroid dysfunction in 130 consecutive outpatients from a department of medicine and 224 patients from a municipal health centre. In addition to clinical examination, three routine tests were done: a thyroxine radioimmunoassay, an analogue-based free thyroxine assay and an immunoradiometric TSH assay. Triiodothyronine and the TRH test were done, if the findings were discrepant. Discrepancy existed in 24% of cases. The TSH assay had no false negative results (sensitivity 100%). Therefore TSH could screen all patients with thyroid dysfunction. Free thyroxine was the most specific assay (specificity 96%), but many subclinically or overtly hypothyroid patients would have been missed, if that assay had been used alone. We conclude that TSH(IRMA) is the best first-line measurement for thyroid dysfunction testing among outpatients. An abnormal TSH result alone is not diagnostic, but should be followed by the measurement of thyroxine or free thyroxine.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Alterations in sodium-potassium regulation in mononuclear leucocytes from young borderline hypertensive and offspring of hypertensive patients. Physiological interactions between diet and exercise in the etiology and prevention of ischaemic heart disease. Glutathione peroxidase activity, selenium and lipid peroxides levels in blood of cancer children. Dementia-like, largely reversible syndrome after cranial irradiation and prolonged interferon treatment. Drug receptors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1