利用IRT残差DIF框架检测多组差异项目功能

IF 1.6 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED Journal of Educational Measurement Pub Date : 2024-10-17 DOI:10.1111/jedm.12415
Hwanggyu Lim, Danqi Zhu, Edison M. Choe, KyungT. Han, Chris
{"title":"利用IRT残差DIF框架检测多组差异项目功能","authors":"Hwanggyu Lim,&nbsp;Danqi Zhu,&nbsp;Edison M. Choe,&nbsp;KyungT. Han,&nbsp;Chris","doi":"10.1111/jedm.12415","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study presents a generalized version of the residual differential item functioning (RDIF) detection framework in item response theory, named GRDIF, to analyze differential item functioning (DIF) in multiple groups. The GRDIF framework retains the advantages of the original RDIF framework, such as computational efficiency and ease of implementation. The performance of GRDIF was assessed through a simulation study and compared with existing DIF detection methods, including the generalized Mantel-Haenszel, Lasso-DIF, and alignment methods. Results showed that the GRDIF framework demonstrated well-controlled Type I error rates close to the nominal level of .05 and satisfactory power in detecting uniform, nonuniform, and mixed DIF across different simulated conditions. Each of the three GRDIF statistics, <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>G</mi>\n <mi>R</mi>\n <mi>D</mi>\n <mi>I</mi>\n <msub>\n <mi>F</mi>\n <mi>R</mi>\n </msub>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$GRDI{{F}_R}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>, <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>G</mi>\n <mi>R</mi>\n <mi>D</mi>\n <mi>I</mi>\n <msub>\n <mi>F</mi>\n <mi>S</mi>\n </msub>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$GRDI{{F}_S}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>, and <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>G</mi>\n <mi>R</mi>\n <mi>D</mi>\n <mi>I</mi>\n <msub>\n <mi>F</mi>\n <mrow>\n <mi>R</mi>\n <mi>S</mi>\n </mrow>\n </msub>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$GRDI{{F}_{RS}}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>, effectively detected the specific type of DIF for which it was designed, with <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>G</mi>\n <mi>R</mi>\n <mi>D</mi>\n <mi>I</mi>\n <msub>\n <mi>F</mi>\n <mrow>\n <mi>R</mi>\n <mi>S</mi>\n </mrow>\n </msub>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$GRDI{{F}_{RS}}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> exhibiting the most robust performance across all types of DIF. The GRDIF framework outperformed other DIF detection methods under various conditions, suggesting its potential for practical applications, particularly in large-scale assessments involving multiple groups. Additionally, an empirical study demonstrated the efficacy and utility of the GRDIF framework in conducting DIF analysis with a high-stakes assessment data set.</p>","PeriodicalId":47871,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Educational Measurement","volume":"61 4","pages":"656-681"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jedm.12415","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Detecting Differential Item Functioning among Multiple Groups Using IRT Residual DIF Framework\",\"authors\":\"Hwanggyu Lim,&nbsp;Danqi Zhu,&nbsp;Edison M. Choe,&nbsp;KyungT. Han,&nbsp;Chris\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jedm.12415\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This study presents a generalized version of the residual differential item functioning (RDIF) detection framework in item response theory, named GRDIF, to analyze differential item functioning (DIF) in multiple groups. The GRDIF framework retains the advantages of the original RDIF framework, such as computational efficiency and ease of implementation. The performance of GRDIF was assessed through a simulation study and compared with existing DIF detection methods, including the generalized Mantel-Haenszel, Lasso-DIF, and alignment methods. Results showed that the GRDIF framework demonstrated well-controlled Type I error rates close to the nominal level of .05 and satisfactory power in detecting uniform, nonuniform, and mixed DIF across different simulated conditions. Each of the three GRDIF statistics, <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <mi>G</mi>\\n <mi>R</mi>\\n <mi>D</mi>\\n <mi>I</mi>\\n <msub>\\n <mi>F</mi>\\n <mi>R</mi>\\n </msub>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation>$GRDI{{F}_R}$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math>, <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <mi>G</mi>\\n <mi>R</mi>\\n <mi>D</mi>\\n <mi>I</mi>\\n <msub>\\n <mi>F</mi>\\n <mi>S</mi>\\n </msub>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation>$GRDI{{F}_S}$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math>, and <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <mi>G</mi>\\n <mi>R</mi>\\n <mi>D</mi>\\n <mi>I</mi>\\n <msub>\\n <mi>F</mi>\\n <mrow>\\n <mi>R</mi>\\n <mi>S</mi>\\n </mrow>\\n </msub>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation>$GRDI{{F}_{RS}}$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math>, effectively detected the specific type of DIF for which it was designed, with <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <mi>G</mi>\\n <mi>R</mi>\\n <mi>D</mi>\\n <mi>I</mi>\\n <msub>\\n <mi>F</mi>\\n <mrow>\\n <mi>R</mi>\\n <mi>S</mi>\\n </mrow>\\n </msub>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation>$GRDI{{F}_{RS}}$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> exhibiting the most robust performance across all types of DIF. The GRDIF framework outperformed other DIF detection methods under various conditions, suggesting its potential for practical applications, particularly in large-scale assessments involving multiple groups. Additionally, an empirical study demonstrated the efficacy and utility of the GRDIF framework in conducting DIF analysis with a high-stakes assessment data set.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47871,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Educational Measurement\",\"volume\":\"61 4\",\"pages\":\"656-681\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jedm.12415\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Educational Measurement\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jedm.12415\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Educational Measurement","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jedm.12415","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究提出了项目反应理论中残余差异项目功能(RDIF)检测框架的广义版本GRDIF,用于分析多群体中的差异项目功能(DIF)。GRDIF框架保留了原始RDIF框架的优点,如计算效率和易于实现。通过仿真研究评估GRDIF的性能,并与现有的DIF检测方法(包括广义Mantel-Haenszel、Lasso-DIF和对准方法)进行比较。结果表明,GRDIF框架在不同模拟条件下检测均匀、非均匀和混合DIF时具有良好的I型错误率控制,接近0.05的标称水平,并且具有令人满意的能力。GRDIF的三个统计量分别为GRDIF R $GRDI{{F}_R}$,G r d I f s $ grdi {{f} _s}$,和GRDI F RS $GRDI{{F}_{RS}}$,有效地检测了所设计的特定类型的DIF;其中GRDI F RS $GRDI{{F}_{RS}}$在所有类型的DIF中表现出最稳健的性能。GRDIF框架在各种条件下优于其他DIF检测方法,表明其具有实际应用潜力,特别是在涉及多群体的大规模评估中。此外,一项实证研究证明了GRDIF框架在使用高风险评估数据集进行DIF分析时的有效性和实用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Detecting Differential Item Functioning among Multiple Groups Using IRT Residual DIF Framework

This study presents a generalized version of the residual differential item functioning (RDIF) detection framework in item response theory, named GRDIF, to analyze differential item functioning (DIF) in multiple groups. The GRDIF framework retains the advantages of the original RDIF framework, such as computational efficiency and ease of implementation. The performance of GRDIF was assessed through a simulation study and compared with existing DIF detection methods, including the generalized Mantel-Haenszel, Lasso-DIF, and alignment methods. Results showed that the GRDIF framework demonstrated well-controlled Type I error rates close to the nominal level of .05 and satisfactory power in detecting uniform, nonuniform, and mixed DIF across different simulated conditions. Each of the three GRDIF statistics, G R D I F R $GRDI{{F}_R}$ , G R D I F S $GRDI{{F}_S}$ , and G R D I F R S $GRDI{{F}_{RS}}$ , effectively detected the specific type of DIF for which it was designed, with G R D I F R S $GRDI{{F}_{RS}}$ exhibiting the most robust performance across all types of DIF. The GRDIF framework outperformed other DIF detection methods under various conditions, suggesting its potential for practical applications, particularly in large-scale assessments involving multiple groups. Additionally, an empirical study demonstrated the efficacy and utility of the GRDIF framework in conducting DIF analysis with a high-stakes assessment data set.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: The Journal of Educational Measurement (JEM) publishes original measurement research, provides reviews of measurement publications, and reports on innovative measurement applications. The topics addressed will interest those concerned with the practice of measurement in field settings, as well as be of interest to measurement theorists. In addition to presenting new contributions to measurement theory and practice, JEM also serves as a vehicle for improving educational measurement applications in a variety of settings.
期刊最新文献
Automated Coding of Communication Data Using LLM: Consistency across Subgroups Automated Coding of Communication Data Using LLM: Consistency across Subgroups Publication Trends in the Journal of Educational Measurement: A Bibliometric Network Analysis Publication Trends in the Journal of Educational Measurement: A Bibliometric Network Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1