基督教和印度教

IF 0.3 0 RELIGION International Review of Mission Pub Date : 2025-01-31 DOI:10.1111/irom.12504
David Emmanuel Singh
{"title":"基督教和印度教","authors":"David Emmanuel Singh","doi":"10.1111/irom.12504","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The Council of Nicaea took place at Constantine's initiative to harmonize religious belief and law into a state-subscribed orthodoxy. From a socio-political viewpoint, the council appeared to use a standardized version of Christianity as an instrument of the empire. The focus in this paper is not on Constantine's initiative or its impact on the non-conforming minorities; rather, it uses this impact as a lens for reviewing an emerging Hindu empire in India. For much of its independent history, India was largely successful in keeping Hindutva's 19th-century undercurrents at bay from polity. The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), however, exposed the shallowness of the Indian experiment with secularism. As Hindutva embraces politics, it also exercises social control. In this sense, Hindutva is no different from Christendom, especially when viewed from the perspective of the impact it has on the minorities: a new act on citizenship, dissent-violence, and reconversions. What this shows is that colonial despotism continues even today.</p>","PeriodicalId":54038,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Mission","volume":"113 2","pages":"355-375"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Christendom and Hindutva\",\"authors\":\"David Emmanuel Singh\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/irom.12504\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The Council of Nicaea took place at Constantine's initiative to harmonize religious belief and law into a state-subscribed orthodoxy. From a socio-political viewpoint, the council appeared to use a standardized version of Christianity as an instrument of the empire. The focus in this paper is not on Constantine's initiative or its impact on the non-conforming minorities; rather, it uses this impact as a lens for reviewing an emerging Hindu empire in India. For much of its independent history, India was largely successful in keeping Hindutva's 19th-century undercurrents at bay from polity. The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), however, exposed the shallowness of the Indian experiment with secularism. As Hindutva embraces politics, it also exercises social control. In this sense, Hindutva is no different from Christendom, especially when viewed from the perspective of the impact it has on the minorities: a new act on citizenship, dissent-violence, and reconversions. What this shows is that colonial despotism continues even today.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54038,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Review of Mission\",\"volume\":\"113 2\",\"pages\":\"355-375\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Review of Mission\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/irom.12504\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Review of Mission","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/irom.12504","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尼西亚会议是在君士坦丁的倡议下召开的,目的是将宗教信仰和法律统一为国家认可的正统教义。从社会政治的角度来看,会议似乎使用了基督教的标准化版本,作为帝国的工具。本文的重点不在于君士坦丁的主动性及其对非正统少数群体的影响;相反,它将这种影响作为审视印度新兴印度教帝国的镜头。在其独立历史的大部分时间里,印度在很大程度上成功地阻止了印度教至上主义在19世纪的潜流。然而,印度人民党(BJP)暴露了印度世俗主义实验的浅薄。印度教信奉政治的同时,也在实行社会控制。从这个意义上说,印度教与基督教没有什么不同,尤其是从它对少数民族的影响来看:一项关于公民身份、反对暴力和重新皈依的新法案。这表明殖民专制直到今天仍在继续。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Christendom and Hindutva

The Council of Nicaea took place at Constantine's initiative to harmonize religious belief and law into a state-subscribed orthodoxy. From a socio-political viewpoint, the council appeared to use a standardized version of Christianity as an instrument of the empire. The focus in this paper is not on Constantine's initiative or its impact on the non-conforming minorities; rather, it uses this impact as a lens for reviewing an emerging Hindu empire in India. For much of its independent history, India was largely successful in keeping Hindutva's 19th-century undercurrents at bay from polity. The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), however, exposed the shallowness of the Indian experiment with secularism. As Hindutva embraces politics, it also exercises social control. In this sense, Hindutva is no different from Christendom, especially when viewed from the perspective of the impact it has on the minorities: a new act on citizenship, dissent-violence, and reconversions. What this shows is that colonial despotism continues even today.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Guest Editorial Christine Lienemann-Perrin. Metamorphosen des Weltchristentums: Ökumenische Theologie in globaler Perspektive (Metamorphosis of World Christianity: Ecumenical Theology in Global Perspective). Stuttgart: Kohlhammer, 2023. 388 pp. Daniel Beros et al., eds. International Handbook on Creation Care and Eco-Diakonia. Oxford: Regnum Books International, 2022. 916 pp. “Were You There…?”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1